Probably could have had him at like 4/18 or something a year. Oh well. I'm not going to start complaining about not committing to a reliever before you have to.
Damn, not bad. I'm paying 60/month for the same package through telus, but it's a corporate plan through a job I left and I'll need to find a new carrier soon. I've heard bad things about Wind's coverage though.
Why do I keep reading quotes like this everywhere?
"The Dodgers made a curious choice in not spending more to land Greinke, FOX Sports’ Jon Paul Morosi opines. While Arizona surpassed all industry expectations for Greinke’s contract, the Dodgers have the financial might to never be outbid on any player they truly want, and the fact that they were willing to offer Greinke a five-year, $155MM deal indicates that there was legitimately interest on Los Angeles’ part. With Greinke gone, the Dodgers now have to spend either money or prospects to acquire another ace."
Why do the Dodgers need a second ace behind Kershaw?
How many pitching contracts, not including Happ and Estrada, would people have been comfortable with under a 140M payroll? For me I think it's just Hill and Lackey. Really happy with Happ and Estrada right now.
Still a pretty impressive collection to have in one system at the same time. Could be a CY contender, a 1/2, a closer, a set-up man, a couple of mid-rotation starters, and a couple of back-end starers.
I believe at one point Syndergaard, Stroman, Norris, Osuna, Sanchez, Desclafani, Castro, Boyd were all in the system. That may have been the best in baseball, I dunno.