Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
42 games in, Montoyo responsible for this many loses: 0

 

But people need someone to blame so this thread has 27 pages.

 

Apparently math is not your strong suit. As of June 6th, the Jays have a record of 23 and 39: that would be 62 games in, and 100 to go.

  • Replies 431
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Verified Member
Posted
Apparently math is not your strong suit. As of June 6th, the Jays have a record of 23 and 39: that would be 62 games in, and 100 to go.

 

Clearly a typo

Posted
wk680 never makes typos. Not now, not yesterday and not never, yo!!

 

 

Wait, what???!!!!

 

He meant that he had made a typo when he said 42 games in (should have been 62)- I do make typos, and so I do go back and edit my posts often.

Posted
He meant that he had made a typo when he said 42 games in (should have been 62)- I do make typos, and so I do go back and edit my posts often

You say you make typos??

 

I don't believe it

Posted
You say you make typos??

 

I don't believe it

 

HA, you know everyone (even Bobby Cox) makes mistakes :P

Posted
42 games in, Montoyo responsible for this many loses: 0

 

But people need someone to blame so this thread has 27 pages.

 

People have a right to call out bad managing decisions. No one is saying its costing the Jay's a playoff spot.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Montoyo pitching Giles 3 days in a row, including one game where we were down 10-7. This after Giles had just come off the DL for elbow discomfort. Fast forward a week later and Giles is unavailable due to elbow discomfort right before the trade deadline.

 

The team blames a massage lol

Posted
Montoyo pitching Giles 3 days in a row, including one game where we were down 10-7. This after Giles had just come off the DL for elbow discomfort. Fast forward a week later and Giles is unavailable due to elbow discomfort right before the trade deadline.

 

The team blames a massage lol

 

We'll see through July.

Posted
They signed Grichuk because he was drafted before Trout. Grichuk > Trout.

 

To confirm your stance is correct...

 

Randal Grichuk signing bonus from 2009: $1,242,000

Mike Trout signing bonus from 2009: $1,215,000

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...