specialiste Verified Member Posted March 29, 2019 Posted March 29, 2019 I noticed yesterday with absolute horror that Sportsnet added the strike zone box right over the plate. That box is a clear and undesirable constraint, as we have to deal with 4 white lines obstructing the path of the pitch and the contact between ball and bat. I'm wondering if Buck and Pat have the “benefit” of the K Zone right over the plate on their monitors… Over the years, the K Zone was on the right side of the screen, away from the action, for God’s sake keep it there. The joy the viewers had to follow the throw and the contact is taken away, with absolutely NO ADDED VALUE to the broadcast. If the K Zone over the plate isn’t deal with fast, and put in it’s right place where it belong outside the field of play, I will cancel my subscription to Sportsnet, it’s as simple as that. We are not imbeciles who has to be told where the strike zone is. If you agree, please write sportsnet at: 'feedback@sportsnet.rogers.com'
BTS Community Moderator Posted March 29, 2019 Posted March 29, 2019 Honestly, it didn't bother me at all and I've been watching baseball for like 25 years. I might even like it better this way.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted March 29, 2019 Posted March 29, 2019 Lol @ canceling your subscription over this
devo Verified Member Posted March 29, 2019 Posted March 29, 2019 Agree with OP that having the K Zone on the side of the screen is much preferred. With that said, Rogers dgaf about you cancelling your subscription and your emails will have 0 effect.
LGBJ29 Verified Member Posted March 29, 2019 Posted March 29, 2019 I emailed them to tell them I love the new look, thanks for the address
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted March 29, 2019 Posted March 29, 2019 Yeah I thought it was great. Even my 6 year old thought it was cool and like how the MPH were right on the screen.
The Iceman Verified Member Posted March 29, 2019 Posted March 29, 2019 I emailed that if they didn't change to KMH I was cancelling. This is Canada. Actually I didn't catch much of the game but I didn't even notice.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 It does seem silly, though, that we have real time data showing definitively whether a ball is a strike and yet still solely rely on a blind old f*** to make that call with no electronic assistance.
FrozenRopes Verified Member Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 I noticed yesterday with absolute horror that Sportsnet added the strike zone box right over the plate. That box is a clear and undesirable constraint, as we have to deal with 4 white lines obstructing the path of the pitch and the contact between ball and bat. I'm wondering if Buck and Pat have the “benefit” of the K Zone right over the plate on their monitors… Over the years, the K Zone was on the right side of the screen, away from the action, for God’s sake keep it there. The joy the viewers had to follow the throw and the contact is taken away, with absolutely NO ADDED VALUE to the broadcast. If the K Zone over the plate isn’t deal with fast, and put in it’s right place where it belong outside the field of play, I will cancel my subscription to Sportsnet, it’s as simple as that. We are not imbeciles who has to be told where the strike zone is. If you agree, please write sportsnet at: 'feedback@sportsnet.rogers.com' You forgot the /s
FrozenRopes Verified Member Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 It does seem silly, though, that we have real time data showing definitively whether a ball is a strike and yet still solely rely on a blind old f*** to make that call with no electronic assistance. I used to enjoy the human component, but with the technology being used for replay etc it just makes sense to move more towards a technology based umpire. Why not give the umps an ear piece with a ball and strike sound to call the pitch? It happens in an instance and would be much more accurate.
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 I used to enjoy the human component, but with the technology being used for replay etc it just makes sense to move more towards a technology based umpire. Why not give the umps an ear piece with a ball and strike sound to call the pitch? It happens in an instance and would be much more accurate. Yes, would need to measure up each batter and bingo.
Daniel Labude Jays Centre Contributor Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 Honestly I dont like it...but its whatever
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 I used to enjoy the human component, but with the technology being used for replay etc it just makes sense to move more towards a technology based umpire. Why not give the umps an ear piece with a ball and strike sound to call the pitch? It happens in an instance and would be much more accurate. I'm with you, but I think instead of an ear piece, more of a shock collar. Punishment for past sins.
TBJ12 Verified Member Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 I used to enjoy the human component, but with the technology being used for replay etc it just makes sense to move more towards a technology based umpire. Why not give the umps an ear piece with a ball and strike sound to call the pitch? It happens in an instance and would be much more accurate. I believe some umpires in the minors are wearing earpieces to assist with ball and strike calls.
Spanky99 Old-Timey Member Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 I believe some umpires in the minors are wearing earpieces to assist with ball and strike calls. Yes, in Indy ball.
intrigid Verified Member Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 The graphic is so subtle and unintrusive that I honestly might not have noticed the change if it wasn't for this thread. I've seen this used in US broadcasts and I've never found it to be anything other than positive. I also really like the new info box format rather than the old info bar.
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 I'd like to see a streamer at the bottom with news from other games
vdubmvp Old-Timey Member Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 I'd like to see a streamer at the bottom with news from other games Ugh I hate that.
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 I'd like to see a streamer at the bottom with news from other games Just go full CP24.
Bobthe4th Old-Timey Member Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 I don’t like that it doesn’t go away between pitches, it’s a bit distracting when the catcher is throwing the ball to the mound, the batter is walking around etc.
bzapple Verified Member Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 As soon as I heard my parents make this exact complaint I knew there would be some crotchety old fan posting about it here on the board. Honestly it's barely noticeable, and several other broadcasts have start using the live K-zone in recent years so it's no surprise sportsnet decided to pick it up.
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 Basically the fan watching with a phone in the stands can make a better call then the ump. Auto home plate ump is inevitable.
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted April 1, 2019 Posted April 1, 2019 Where the f*** did the square + MPH go? did this grumpy old *******'s complaints work?
Spanky99 Old-Timey Member Posted April 1, 2019 Posted April 1, 2019 Where the f*** did the square + MPH go? did this grumpy old *******'s complaints work? lol
wilko Old-Timey Member Posted April 2, 2019 Posted April 2, 2019 I don't mind it at all. It kind of helps you realize how good/s***** the ump is that day.
Sorrow Verified Member Posted April 2, 2019 Posted April 2, 2019 I really like the new square strike zone over the plate.
Slade Old-Timey Member Posted April 2, 2019 Posted April 2, 2019 I'd like to see a streamer at the bottom with news from other games That's one thing I don't want to see at all. I hated watching things on theScore because of their constant ticker.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted April 5, 2019 Posted April 5, 2019 I'm with you, but I think instead of an ear piece, more of a shock collar. Punishment for past sins. "Strike" BZZZZZZZT "I mean, Ball"
DigitalRock Old-Timey Member Posted April 5, 2019 Posted April 5, 2019 I noticed yesterday with absolute horror that Sportsnet added the strike zone box right over the plate. That box is a clear and undesirable constraint, as we have to deal with 4 white lines obstructing the path of the pitch and the contact between ball and bat. I'm wondering if Buck and Pat have the “benefit” of the K Zone right over the plate on their monitors… Over the years, the K Zone was on the right side of the screen, away from the action, for God’s sake keep it there. The joy the viewers had to follow the throw and the contact is taken away, with absolutely NO ADDED VALUE to the broadcast. If the K Zone over the plate isn’t deal with fast, and put in it’s right place where it belong outside the field of play, I will cancel my subscription to Sportsnet, it’s as simple as that. We are not imbeciles who has to be told where the strike zone is. If you agree, please write sportsnet at: 'feedback@sportsnet.rogers.com' You are being a tad over dramatic there bud.
JoJo Parker Dunedin Blue Jays - A SS On Tuesday, Parker was just 1-for-5, but the one hit was his first professional home run. Explore JoJo Parker News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now