Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Community Moderator
Posted

This is such a disgusting and boring but no-brainer / good-on-paper trade, lmao.

 

The ultimate Atkins 2019 move. Makes all the sense in the world and pisses off the masses.

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Now let's trade Stroman to them for Baez and Allen.

 

I'd be fine with that type of deal, but holy s*** this team is going to suck even more than everyone expects them to if they trade Stroman and replace him with Richard.

 

Richard was about a 0.5 WAR reliever per season in 2015-16. I think using him out of the pen and hoping for a good half season might net more in a mid season trade than anything he could do as a starter. If anything, starting him might destroy his value, especially in this division.

Posted
I'd be fine with that type of deal, but holy s*** this team is going to suck even more than everyone expects them to if they trade Stroman and replace him with Richard.

 

Richard was about a 0.5 WAR reliever per season in 2015-16. I think using him out of the pen and hoping for a good half season might net more in a mid season trade than anything he could do as a starter. If anything, starting him might destroy his value, especially in this division.

 

Might be an effective LOOGY. Has good numbers vs LHB

Posted
I'd be fine with that type of deal, but holy s*** this team is going to suck even more than everyone expects them to if they trade Stroman and replace him with Richard.

 

Richard was about a 0.5 WAR reliever per season in 2015-16. I think using him out of the pen and hoping for a good half season might net more in a mid season trade than anything he could do as a starter. If anything, starting him might destroy his value, especially in this division.

 

You mention the 0.5 reliever seasons in 15-16 but not the 2.4 WAR year he had immediately after as a starter? Richard is anything but sexy but he's pitching depth, of the slightly below average to average variety.

Posted
You mention the 0.5 reliever seasons in 15-16 but not the 2.4 WAR year he had immediately after as a starter? Richard is anything but sexy but he's pitching depth, of the slightly below average to average variety.

 

I might hate watching Richard pitch more than I did with R.A. Dickey.

Posted
I might hate watching Richard pitch more than I did with R.A. Dickey.

 

This isn't possible lmao

 

With Dickey you were reminded each pitch that Syndergaard was given up for the pile of garbage

Community Moderator
Posted
I might hate watching Richard pitch more than I did with R.A. Dickey.

 

I actually quite enjoying watching him when he's on.

Posted
I might hate watching Richard pitch more than I did with R.A. Dickey.

 

He has such a funky delivery that I can kind of get this even when he's doing well.

Posted
Jays getting Jackson has seemed likely for about 8 years now

 

Didn't we technically have Jackson like 8 years ago? Thought he was a pretty decent starter then, remember questioning the quick flip at the time

Posted
You mention the 0.5 reliever seasons in 15-16 but not the 2.4 WAR year he had immediately after as a starter? Richard is anything but sexy but he's pitching depth, of the slightly below average to average variety.

 

I didn’t mention it because I don’t think there’s any chance in hell he will come close to that again, especially in the AL East. He seems like someone who will get torched in this division. As a reliever I think he might be more valuable but the Jays might be more worried about the innings than the value/role.

 

For $1.5m and a nothing prospect, it’s not a bad deal.

Posted
This is a zero upside, zero downside move. The Jays could have signed Lynn for 3 for 30, but that came with both upside and downside risk. Instead we got a guy who won't help in the future, but he won't hurt the future either. I just don't see how the Jays are going to compete in 2 or 3 years unless they take a few chances. Maybe next year we will see some them gamble a bit more.
Posted

0 downside....basically 0 cost.... doesn't really move the needle....casual fans with no brains losing their s***....

 

Yup, checks all the expected boxes for 2019. Makes it a winner in my books.

Posted
This is a zero upside, zero downside move. The Jays could have signed Lynn for 3 for 30, but that came with both upside and downside risk. Instead we got a guy who won't help in the future, but he won't hurt the future either. I just don't see how the Jays are going to compete in 2 or 3 years unless they take a few chances. Maybe next year we will see some them gamble a bit more.

 

I wouldn't say zero upside. He's a cheap vet who could very plausibly post an ERA slightly under 4 with some good babip luck. That could return a McKinney or Teoscar type player at the deadline imo.

Posted
I wouldn't say zero upside. He's a cheap vet who could very plausibly post an ERA slightly under 4 with some good babip luck. That could return a McKinney or Teoscar type player at the deadline imo.

 

That is a very optimistic outlook. I would be shocked if he posts an ERA under 4 in the AL East and get player anywhere close to McKinney or Teoscar. I don't see how Richard would fit on a team in a playoff race. Who's going to trade for him. I could see shoemaker bringing a return, but not Richard.

Posted
That is a very optimistic outlook. I would be shocked if he posts an ERA under 4 in the AL East and get player anywhere close to McKinney or Teoscar. I don't see how Richard would fit on a team in a playoff race. Who's going to trade for him. I could see shoemaker bringing a return, but not Richard.

 

He'd be more for the stretch drive, and could probably fill a slot in the pen beyond that if necessary. His ground ball ability would be the attraction, especially in a band box. He's projected at a 4.14 xFIP, and had 3.76 in 2017. It's not hard to imagine that a little babip luck would produce something like that.

Posted
He'd be more for the stretch drive, and could probably fill a slot in the pen beyond that if necessary. His ground ball ability would be the attraction, especially in a band box. He's projected at a 4.14 xFIP, and had 3.76 in 2017. It's not hard to imagine that a little babip luck would produce something like that.

 

He's a more than a year older than Tulo. He's moving from San Diego to Rogers Centre. He's going to lead the league in homers given up if he pitches more than 180 innings.

Posted
He's a more than a year older than Tulo. He's moving from San Diego to Rogers Centre. He's going to lead the league in homers given up if he pitches more than 180 innings.

 

He's an extreme groundball pitcher lol, he could have a 20% HR/FB ratio and he still wouldn't be close to being among the league worst.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...