Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted

Who's winning the MVP race?

 

Donaldson is the clear favourite IMO. Altuve is probably a close second and might get the nod.

 

 

Other players who could win with a hot 2 months:

Machado

Trout

Betts

Bogaerts

Old-Timey Member
Posted
I don't think Donaldson is the clear favorite anymore. If the Astros make the playoffs. Altuve wins in a landslide.
Posted
Altuve is having a great year, but he's still a fair bit behind Donaldson and Trout despite a career high BABIP. It would be a real slap in the face to those two if things stay the same and he wins.
Posted

Wouldn't count out Ortiz. We know how the voters will react to it being his last season and stuff, I'm sure he'll get a good chunk of votes.

 

Though I think it's between Donaldson, and Altuve. If the Astros don't make the postseason, that will be taken into consideration. Trout should be in the conversation as well, though only with 21 HR's and playing on a losing team, the voters won't give him much acknowledgement.

Posted
Wouldn't count out Ortiz. We know how the voters will react to it being his last season and stuff, I'm sure he'll get a good chunk of votes.

 

Though I think it's between Donaldson, and Altuve. If the Astros don't make the postseason, that will be taken into consideration. Trout should be in the conversation as well, though only with 21 HR's and playing on a losing team, the voters won't give him much acknowledgement.

 

You know what... that's a good point, Ortiz does have an outside shot for sure. You could definitely make a fair case for him especially if they win the division.

Posted

Someone suggested here they should have an MVP and a Player of the Year which I agree with. Considering MVP highly relates to overall team performance and the best players in the league don't always get the recognition they deserve.

 

That said, I think voters love batting champs as well and Altuve wins it if Houston is in the postseason and the two remain close in WAR.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Should be MVP race:

Trout

Donaldson

Altuve

 

Actual MVP race:

Altuve

Donaldson

Trout

 

Trout can win the Hank Aaron Award and Silver Slugger. Save the MVP's with players whose team aren't in the cellar.

Posted
Someone suggested here they should have an MVP and a Player of the Year which I agree with. Considering MVP highly relates to overall team performance and the best players in the league don't always get the recognition they deserve.

 

That said, I think voters love batting champs as well and Altuve wins it if Houston is in the postseason and the two remain close in WAR.

 

Too many awards make the awards worth less

 

Look at the NHL they have like 5 awards for forwards

Posted
Someone suggested here they should have an MVP and a Player of the Year which I agree with. Considering MVP highly relates to overall team performance and the best players in the league don't always get the recognition they deserve.

 

That said, I think voters love batting champs as well and Altuve wins it if Houston is in the postseason and the two remain close in WAR.

 

I don't get this. MVP should be most valuable player on any team. So if a team could take any player for that year who would it be? Clearly its Trout.

Posted
Depends on if the Jays make the playoffs and what JD does there. Their WAR numbers are very close but Trout is better by a bit.

 

voting is before the postseason starts

Old-Timey Member
Posted
something something WAR's error bars are not precise enough / meant for an MVP race
Posted
something something WAR's error bars are not precise enough / meant for an MVP race

 

I agree but it's a pretty good start. Not sure if they're included in WAR but OPS+, RC+ are also nice stats to look at.

Posted
voting is before the postseason starts

 

Damn, really? I'm dumn. Well I say it depends if the Jays make the playoffs then. I think that would give JD a considerable advantage, especially if we win the AL East.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
I agree but it's a pretty good start. Not sure if they're included in WAR but OPS+, RC+ are also nice stats to look at.

 

Offensive component of WAR is wRC+ by playing time

 

Imo Cyborg is gonna be dumn and complain when Altuve wins cause Trout had 0.000613252696969696969 WAR more than him

Posted
Trout can win the Hank Aaron Award and Silver Slugger. Save the MVP's with players whose team aren't in the cellar.

 

Good point - it's Trout's fault for not making his Owner and GM better at their jobs.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Good point - it's Trout's fault for not making his Owner and GM better at their jobs.

 

Good players make those around them better at their jobs

Posted
Trout can win the Hank Aaron Award and Silver Slugger. Save the MVP's with players whose team aren't in the cellar.

 

Agree.

 

Trout signed Lincecum, Weaver and CJ Wilson

Posted

I've said it before, I've said it again...MVP is such an ambiguous term. Everyone seems to have different criteria for what they think it should encapsulate, so how can you really grade it properly. Is it the most dominant player that year...does team success have something to do with it?

 

Personally...I think it should be called, TBP (The Best Player). Forget how the team did. Who had the most dominant statistical season. Period. A dominant player shouldn't be penalized because his team doesn't have what it takes. If you want to award players on great teams then create an award for ensemble cast.

Posted
Agree.

 

Trout signed Lincecum, Weaver and CJ Wilson

 

Actually Seattle's GM signed Weaver and Wilson. Though the Angel's GM did trade for Ricky Nolasco!

Posted
I've said it before, I've said it again...MVP is such an ambiguous term. Everyone seems to have different criteria for what they think it should encapsulate, so how can you really grade it properly. Is it the most dominant player that year...does team success have something to do with it?

 

Personally...I think it should be called, TBP (The Best Player). Forget how the team did. Who had the most dominant statistical season. Period. A dominant player shouldn't be penalized because his team doesn't have what it takes. If you want to award players on great teams then create an award for ensemble cast.

 

I think most people came to terms a long time ago that team success should not matter except the dinosaur voters a few people that hate change.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...