Carp12 Verified Member Posted October 14, 2016 Posted October 14, 2016 Brendan Kennedy Verified account @BKennedyStar Mark Shapiro tells @bruce_arthur & others the Jays are unlikely to be top-5 in payroll, but should be in "next five" Isn't that what they currently are?
AdamLindsMom Verified Member Posted October 14, 2016 Posted October 14, 2016 Brendan Kennedy Verified account @BKennedyStar Mark Shapiro tells @bruce_arthur & others the Jays are unlikely to be top-5 in payroll, but should be in "next five" This is such a crock. These reporters aren't doing their jobs when Shapiro says for reasons he doesn't want to get into. There is no reason the Jays shouldn't be a top 5 team.
Olerud363 Old-Timey Member Posted October 14, 2016 Posted October 14, 2016 As I understand it, fangraphs playoff odds are merely an extension of their regular season projections. They would be entirely inaccurate from a historical perspective. You are such an unpleasant truly vile human being... Their projections are good. Far better than you could do. If they predicted 100 series, they would likely beat you. They would get maybe 55 right. You would probably get 50. In any series the advantages are so small, it is, to say it again "a virtual coin flip" That means it takes 10s to hundreds of series for a prediction system to show it's slight advantage. You are true evil. Worse than Trump. You either have no understanding of statistical processes, or you are just a vile human being looking for attention. I am Grant, I am Clever, I am an elitist. I know secret little observations that the common man cannot see, that the statisticians cannot see, it is about me, me, I am clever. ME!!! Grant and Trump two selfish pees in a pod.
Grant77 Old-Timey Member Posted October 14, 2016 Posted October 14, 2016 Isn't that what they currently are? We were 17th in payroll at the start of the season. Breaking into the top 10 would require a roughly 14 million dollar increase.
Olerud363 Old-Timey Member Posted October 14, 2016 Posted October 14, 2016 You are such an unpleasant truly vile human being... Their projections are good. Far better than you could do. If they predicted 100 series, they would likely beat you. They would get maybe 55 right. You would probably get 50. In any series the advantages are so small, it is, to say it again "a virtual coin flip" That means it takes 10s to hundreds of series for a prediction system to show it's slight advantage. You are true evil. Worse than Trump. You either have no understanding of statistical processes, or you are just a vile human being looking for attention. I am Grant, I am Clever, I am an elitist. I know secret little observations that the common man cannot see, that the statisticians cannot see, it is about me, me, I am clever. ME!!! Grant and Trump two selfish pees in a pod. Here is what Grant thinks, vs. Reality, Hypothetically say we did did for several lifetimes, it would take that long to see the advantages of the projection system... here is what Grant (in his strange little mind) thinks would happen Grant - 727/1000 series correct luck - 505/1000 series correct Projection System - 420/1000 series right Here is an example of what would really happen Projection System - 557/1000 series right Grant - 507/1000 series right Luck - 498/1000 series right Grant would cherry pick that he at least beat luck, but it's just that even after 1000 series the odds wouldn't quite even out.
Grant77 Old-Timey Member Posted October 14, 2016 Posted October 14, 2016 I had no idea that trusting statistically significant trends was evil. I may have to reevaluate my life and stop falling prey to critical thinking. Thanks for the wake up call Olerud.
Virgil_Hiltz Verified Member Posted October 14, 2016 Posted October 14, 2016 We were 17th in payroll at the start of the season. Breaking into the top 10 would require a roughly 14 million dollar increase. That's true if the other teams doesn't increase their payroll. I'm just not sure how Shapiro can make this statement with any amount of certainty! But it does sound good that they want to move up the list! (even spending that "14mil", Rogers would still be rolling in a lot more $$$)
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted October 14, 2016 Author Posted October 14, 2016 Isn't that what they currently are? Started the year #17 Now we're #11 after adding Liriano etc http://www.spotrac.com/mlb/payroll/
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted October 14, 2016 Author Posted October 14, 2016 This is such a crock. These reporters aren't doing their jobs when Shapiro says for reasons he doesn't want to get into. There is no reason the Jays shouldn't be a top 5 team. They don't NEED to be top 5 payroll Los Angeles Dodgers, New York Yankees, Boston Red Sox, Detroit Tigers will remain the top 4 Let them spend >>> 200M and pay luxury tax (and only 2 of them even made the playoffs)
Grant77 Old-Timey Member Posted October 14, 2016 Posted October 14, 2016 They don't NEED to be top 5 payroll Los Angeles Dodgers, New York Yankees, Boston Red Sox, Detroit Tigers will remain the top 4 Let them spend > 200M and pay luxury tax Absolutely agree. I think we can say with some certainty that payroll will be at least 140 million if Shapiro was willing to throw that statement out there. Our projected payroll for 2017 is about 110 million including arb raises. That should leave us with plenty of wiggle room to address our needs.
AdamLindsMom Verified Member Posted October 14, 2016 Posted October 14, 2016 They don't need to spend Dodger/Yankee dumb but there's no reason they shouldn't be in the 180-200 range especially if it means they can remain competitive and draw big crowds.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted October 14, 2016 Author Posted October 14, 2016 (edited) Absolutely agree. I think we can say with some certainty that payroll will be at least 140 million if Shapiro was willing to throw that statement out there. Our projected payroll for 2017 is about 110 million including arb raises. That should leave us with plenty of wiggle room to address our needs. Heck yeah We have what will likely project to be a top 5 starting rotation for about 41M Sanchez 0.5M Stroman 0.5M Happ 13M Estrada13M Liriano 14M That's a GREAT starting point We have good to great cost controlled players in Travis, Pillar and Donaldson The only really big 2017 $ years committed to at the moment are for Martin and Tulo and they're both actually worth it We're not paying a single player big $ to play elsewhere or paying anyone despite them being retired (unlike the Rangers and Yankees) Most of our holes will likely be bullpen and corner OF spots - not nearly as hard to fill as SP, C and MIF We're not in bad shape at all Edited October 14, 2016 by G-Snarls
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted October 14, 2016 Author Posted October 14, 2016 They don't need to spend Dodger/Yankee dumb but there's no reason they shouldn't be in the 180-200 range especially if it means they can remain competitive and draw big crowds. Yes for the right players you could go there Luxury tax threshold will be around 190M
KingKat Old-Timey Member Posted October 14, 2016 Posted October 14, 2016 As I understand it, fangraphs playoff odds are merely an extension of their regular season projections. They would be entirely inaccurate from a historical perspective. You are such an unpleasant truly vile human being... Their projections are good. Far better than you could do. If they predicted 100 series, they would likely beat you. They would get maybe 55 right. You would probably get 50. In any series the advantages are so small, it is, to say it again "a virtual coin flip" That means it takes 10s to hundreds of series for a prediction system to show it's slight advantage. You are true evil. Worse than Trump. You either have no understanding of statistical processes, or you are just a vile human being looking for attention. I am Grant, I am Clever, I am an elitist. I know secret little observations that the common man cannot see, that the statisticians cannot see, it is about me, me, I am clever. ME!!! Grant and Trump two selfish pees in a pod. Am I the only one who thinks that of all the things to get really mad at Grant about, this one is a really, really odd choice?
SweetSmellingChacin Verified Member Posted October 14, 2016 Posted October 14, 2016 #6-10 puts you in the 160-180 million range, which is good enough to compete with. But given the attendance and ratings numbers over the last couple years (both at or near the top in MLB), they should be a top 5 payroll, but Rogers is going to Rogers.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted October 14, 2016 Author Posted October 14, 2016 I know it's been said over and over but... Russel Martin 9 post season appearances in 11 MLB seasons, with 4 different teams Damn...
Carp12 Verified Member Posted October 14, 2016 Posted October 14, 2016 Heck yeah We have what will likely project to be a top 5 starting rotation for about 41M Sanchez 0.5M Stroman 0.5M Happ 13M Estrada13M Liriano 14M That's a GREAT starting point We have good to great cost controlled players in Travis, Pillar and Donaldson The only really big 2017 $ years committed to at the moment are for Martin and Tulo and they're both actually worth it We're not paying a single player big $ to play elsewhere or paying anyone despite them being retired (unlike the Rangers and Yankees) Most of our holes will likely be bullpen and corner OF spots - not nearly as hard to fill as SP, C and MIF We're not in bad shape at all Stroman might be a super 2. If so mlbtraderumors projects a salary of 3.5m
bones10 Old-Timey Member Posted October 14, 2016 Posted October 14, 2016 Heck yeah We have what will likely project to be a top 5 starting rotation for about 41M Sanchez 0.5M Stroman 0.5M Happ 13M Estrada13M Liriano 14M That's a GREAT starting point We have good to great cost controlled players in Travis, Pillar and Donaldson The only really big 2017 $ years committed to at the moment are for Martin and Tulo and they're both actually worth it We're not paying a single player big $ to play elsewhere or paying anyone despite them being retired (unlike the Rangers and Yankees) Most of our holes will likely be bullpen and corner OF spots - not nearly as hard to fill as SP, C and MIF We're not in bad shape at all Wait cost wise, how are tulo and martin exactly worth it
burlingtonbandit Old-Timey Member Posted October 14, 2016 Posted October 14, 2016 Wait cost wise, how are tulo and martin exactly worth it Because they're value is worth more than $20 million/year. At least for next year it is.
burlingtonbandit Old-Timey Member Posted October 14, 2016 Posted October 14, 2016 Blue Jays are a top 5 Market in MLB. NYY, BOS, CHC and LAD are the only franchises you could make an argument to be ahead of Toronto. In terms of market size its likely top 3 if not higher.
Krylian Old-Timey Member Posted October 14, 2016 Posted October 14, 2016 I know it's been said over and over but... Russel Martin 9 post season appearances in 11 MLB seasons, with 4 different teams Damn... That's a team stat
RealAccountant Old-Timey Member Posted October 14, 2016 Posted October 14, 2016 I know it's been said over and over but... Russel Martin 9 post season appearances in 11 MLB seasons, with 4 different teams Damn... Martin is prime
Mittens87 Verified Member Posted October 14, 2016 Posted October 14, 2016 What other teams are owned by companies like Rogers where the baseball team is just a small part of the company and have stock holders to answer to?
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted October 14, 2016 Author Posted October 14, 2016 Wait cost wise, how are tulo and martin exactly worth it Each probably project for 2.5-4 WAR That's easily worth 20M plus It's the later years that will more likely be a problem
Olerud363 Old-Timey Member Posted October 14, 2016 Posted October 14, 2016 Am I the only one who thinks that of all the things to get really mad at Grant about, this one is a really, really odd choice? Maybe... it's just sooo... typical Grant... Projections are just Big Data AIs, Grant is smarter than big data. One would assume that any observation Grant can make, the fangraphs people can make too, and use it to make their AI better. Or perhaps the AI can beat humans... but not according to Grant. Order of intelligence 1. Grant 2. Big data 3. Common people
Grant77 Old-Timey Member Posted October 14, 2016 Posted October 14, 2016 What other teams are owned by companies like Rogers where the baseball team is just a small part of the company and have stock holders to answer to? The Nats and Braves are the only other teams owned by corporations, but I think it's safe to say they are different situations.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted October 14, 2016 Author Posted October 14, 2016 The Nats and Braves are the only other teams owned by corporations, but I think it's safe to say they are different situations. There are some similarities between Rogers and Turner
Grant77 Old-Timey Member Posted October 14, 2016 Posted October 14, 2016 Dave Cameron at Fangraphs would be the first to say that their advanced standings are an interesting tool designed for the regular season. I have serious doubts that he'd recommend using them to predict the playoffs. I'm sure it's something that they would answer in a chat.
Grant77 Old-Timey Member Posted October 14, 2016 Posted October 14, 2016 There are some similarities between Rogers and Turner I think more so before Ted Rogers passed, but I see your point.
Josh Kasevich Buffalo Bisons - AAA SS Kasevich tallied 3 hits on Thursday including his 17th double. He's now hitting .303 on the season. Explore Josh Kasevich News >
Recommended Posts