TDotttt2005 Verified Member Posted March 16, 2016 Posted March 16, 2016 Anyone hear Morosi on Blundell today? Kept hinting around about a possible Hutchison deal, discussing the Jays lining him up to start at night, on the road, to maximize his exposure. Out of the Heyman, Rosenthal, Morosi's etc., I'd say Morosi is the least 'gospel' of them all, but he must be hearing some things. The thing that didnt make sense, is that he said the Jays would be looking for a guy like Matt Boyd last year, someone young, with options, projectable, that can be run up and down between the Bisons and Jays to help this year, but with upside beyond this year. Had me thinking, uhhhh isn't that Hutchison youre describing? Not sure why the Jays would give up on him now, selling at his lowest point in a long time, but interesting to think of what other holes they could fill with a potential Hutch deal.
HERPDERP Old-Timey Member Posted March 16, 2016 Posted March 16, 2016 The deal would have to be a whole lot better than Hutchison for a Matt Boyd-type I don't see Shatkins reversing their quest for pitching depth, especially since Hutchison has more potential than anything we could possibly get a return of
Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted March 16, 2016 Posted March 16, 2016 I can't see how he would have enough trade value to even explore this, and that's completely putting aside the fact that we don't have SP depth to trade.
Sammy225 Old-Timey Member Posted March 16, 2016 Posted March 16, 2016 Makes zero sense to trade Hutch for pitching depth when he is essentially our pitching depth. Unless there is more to it then what we know. Because your not going to get anything better the Hutch back that younger. So it is basically a lateral move
Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted March 16, 2016 Posted March 16, 2016 Makes zero sense to trade Hutch for pitching depth when he is essentially our pitching depth. Unless there is more to it then what we know. Because your not going to get anything better the Hutch back that younger. So it is basically a lateral move I wouldn't trade Hutchison for anything less than Dansby Swanson, Ender Inciarte and Aaron Blair. Clearly that's what the market bears for pitchers of his ability.
z3r0s Old-Timey Member Posted March 16, 2016 Posted March 16, 2016 I wouldn't trade Hutchison for anything less than Dansby Swanson, Ender Inciarte and Aaron Blair. Clearly that's what the market bears for pitchers of his ability. Results matter mang. We'll have to settled for Dansby and Blair without Ender.
Governator Community Moderator Posted March 16, 2016 Posted March 16, 2016 or maybe they just want to get his confidence up and pitch in environments he thrives in to figure s*** out.
Jonzo Verified Member Posted March 16, 2016 Posted March 16, 2016 Why would we trade Hutch and sell low? He's our depth, has options, and has upside. I don't see what we'd gain by giving up on him at this point.
KingKat Old-Timey Member Posted March 16, 2016 Posted March 16, 2016 The trade as described sounds like it would be a straight up challenge trade. There would have to be very little faith in Hutch's upside to do something like this.
TDotttt2005 Verified Member Posted March 16, 2016 Author Posted March 16, 2016 I wouldn't trade Hutchison for anything less than Dansby Swanson, Ender Inciarte and Aaron Blair. Clearly that's what the market bears for pitchers of his ability. May be able to get Jeff Blair.
Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted March 16, 2016 Posted March 16, 2016 The trade as described sounds like it would be a straight up challenge trade. There would have to be very little faith in Hutch's upside to do something like this. I could see that if a team had a flyball friendly park, like the Angels or the Padres or the Mariners. Hutchison is probably never going to line up his ERA with his xFIP in a home run haven like RC.
RealAccountant Old-Timey Member Posted March 16, 2016 Posted March 16, 2016 Chavez for elite reliever looks worse everyday
Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted March 16, 2016 Posted March 16, 2016 May be able to get Jeff Blair. Great. We could use an older, slightly less retarded Mike Wilner.
Sammy225 Old-Timey Member Posted March 16, 2016 Posted March 16, 2016 Maybe the Dodgers want him considering their pitchers are dying off left right and center
Angrioter Old-Timey Member Posted March 16, 2016 Posted March 16, 2016 Hutchison+ for Soler. Soler can't run or hit dingers, but he's cuban.
Brownie19 Old-Timey Member Posted March 16, 2016 Posted March 16, 2016 I could see that if a team had a flyball friendly park, like the Angels or the Padres or the Mariners. Hutchison is probably never going to line up his ERA with his xFIP in a home run haven like RC. Petco is actually considered a hitters park now. KC would be a good fit park/defense wise. Maybe Miami for Ozuna
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted March 16, 2016 Posted March 16, 2016 Hutch is likely wirth more to us playing in AAA as depth with upside than we could get for him via trade. Can't imagine his trade value is much at all. But he still has upside and options.
Grant77 Old-Timey Member Posted March 16, 2016 Posted March 16, 2016 I could see that if a team had a flyball friendly park, like the Angels or the Padres or the Mariners. Hutchison is probably never going to line up his ERA with his xFIP in a home run haven like RC. I'd consider a deal involving Hutch and a pitcher like Jesse Hahn if his health checks out.
Johnny King Vancouver Canadians - A+ LHP The 19-year-old top prospect has made 16 High-A starts. He is 3-2 with a 2.92 ERA. In 61 2/3 innings, he's walked 35, but he's struck out 83 batters. Explore Johnny King News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now