Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted June 13, 2015 Posted June 13, 2015 The Jays have not been in many close games recently. Gibbons hasn't had much opportunity to blow games. 4-4 in the 7th right now? This thread will have activity soon enough. You were saying?
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted June 13, 2015 Posted June 13, 2015 You were saying? If it wasn't for Gibbons, they'd have won at least 15 of the last 10 games...
ElNik2013 Old-Timey Member Posted June 13, 2015 Posted June 13, 2015 So now would be a good time, wouldn't it? Kind of crafty, you know, like Farrell.
GD Old-Timey Member Posted June 13, 2015 Posted June 13, 2015 If it wasn't for Gibbons, they'd have won at least 15 of the last 10 games... lmao
RealAccountant Old-Timey Member Posted June 13, 2015 Posted June 13, 2015 Just BC the Gibby has managed not to screw up in the last 10 games doesn't make.up for the first 53 Jays would be 7-8 games over .500 with another manager
dineke Old-Timey Member Posted June 13, 2015 Posted June 13, 2015 Another manager would have stopped Hutchison and Dickey from being gascans for sure.
glory Old-Timey Member Posted June 13, 2015 Posted June 13, 2015 What a revelation. You're a genius. That goes without saying. Tell the geniuses who think Gibbons is a great manager that bad managers hurt teams. They don't seem to agree.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted June 13, 2015 Posted June 13, 2015 That goes without saying. Tell the geniuses who think Gibbons is a great manager that bad managers hurt teams. They don't seem to agree. Probably my favourite trait about Gibbons is that he's very even keeled. He never gets too high or too low, isn't afraid to stick up for his players (unlike Farrell) and generally does not overreact to situations. How many managers overreact and take out Hutch early or Hendriks after he loaded the bases today? Gibbons' BP management today was sublime and you're an idiot to say otherwise. He put this team in the best position to win today, and they made a nice comeback.
glory Old-Timey Member Posted June 13, 2015 Posted June 13, 2015 You were saying? Hendriks for 2 innings was the right call. I was expecting Coke to face Ortiz to justify that unnecessary call up, but he kept one of his best relievers in the game and it paid off. Broken clock.
dineke Old-Timey Member Posted June 13, 2015 Posted June 13, 2015 That goes without saying. Tell the geniuses who think Gibbons is a great manager that bad managers hurt teams. They don't seem to agree. You think they don't agree that bad managers hurt teams because they think Gibbons is a great manager? Huh?
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted June 13, 2015 Posted June 13, 2015 The Jays bats are hot, the starting pitching has stabilized, and the 'pen has been bolstered by Delabar. Less opportunity for Gibby f***ups.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted June 13, 2015 Posted June 13, 2015 The Jays bats are hot, the starting pitching has stabilized, and the 'pen has been bolstered by Delabar. Less opportunity for Gibby f***ups. Cling to whatever you want man. I know how hard it is to admit defeat.
CrackerJack Verified Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 there will be a run with or without Gibbons. so it might as well happen with Gibbons because Gibby is good people. imagine if Gibbons was dismissed at the time of the McCown speculation ... the managerial change certainly would've been the main reason for the team catching fire, right?
SparkyAnderson Verified Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 Just BC the Gibby has managed not to screw up in the last 10 games doesn't make.up for the first 53 Jays would be 7-8 games over .500 with another manager You really think a different manager would be worth a full 4-5 extra wins? Maybe if he went out there and actually pitched himself. Gibbons might not be the best manager in baseball but there is no way he has THAT much influence over win/loss.
Mikeleelop Verified Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 Just BC the Gibby has managed not to screw up in the last 10 games doesn't make.up for the first 53 Jays would be 7-8 games over .500 with another manager How do you come up with this arbitrary number?
thatoneguy Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 Just BC the Gibby has managed not to screw up in the last 10 games doesn't make.up for the first 53 Jays would be 7-8 games over .500 with another manager For the record I'm not the biggest Gibby fan either, but this post is just blatant stupidity.
RealAccountant Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 For the record I'm not the biggest Gibby fan either, but this post is just blatant stupidity. why Just because the team is over .500, the manager is good. Just look at the run differential, with a 68 positive run deferential Jays are 3 games over .500. The Cardinals with almost the same run differential are 21 games over .500. Their players are producing the same as our players, yet they are 18 games better than us.
RealAccountant Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 How do you come up with this arbitrary number? http://espn.go.com/mlb/stats/rpi
RealAccountant Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 You really think a different manager would be worth a full 4-5 extra wins? Maybe if he went out there and actually pitched himself. Gibbons might not be the best manager in baseball but there is no way he has THAT much influence over win/loss. Not extra wins. No such thing as extra wins. Yes the manager has that much impact. The manager is the one deciding who pitches at what particular time, he is the one deciding to put a DH in left field. According to fangraphs, Colabello has cost us 10 runs by playing lf this season. thats almost 2 games. Isn't that a managerial decision, or does Colabello just wake up and say I am playing left field today and no one can stop me The Jays are winning right now in-spite of Gibbons, because even his total incompetent management cannot hold back this team from achieving success.
thatoneguy Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 why Just because the team is over .500, the manager is good. Just look at the run differential, with a 68 positive run deferential Jays are 3 games over .500. The Cardinals with almost the same run differential are 21 games over .500. Their players are producing the same as our players, yet they are 18 games better than us. Our starting pitching was complete ass for the better part of April and May, that's not going to help a team with any manager.
Daniel Labude Jays Centre Contributor Posted June 14, 2015 Author Posted June 14, 2015 Our starting pitching was complete ass for the better part of April and May, that's not going to help a team with any manager. Also N.L. teams sucks offensively
thatoneguy Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 Also N.L. teams sucks offensively Good sentence there.
RealAccountant Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 Cito won 2 World Series despite being a train wreck of a manager. Thats what you think. However how many people here were actually around to see Cito manage. Not many.
Mikeleelop Verified Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 http://espn.go.com/mlb/stats/rpi This indicates to me that gibbons in doing a great job, not that he cost us the games
RealAccountant Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 Our starting pitching was complete ass for the better part of April and May, that's not going to help a team with any manager. Starting pitching is still garbage, The offense is making up for it with the bat. Just like it was in April and May but atrocious bullpen management, and a lack of strategy was costing Gibby Games You have to be a terrible manager to get to 500 wins in MLB despite being a below .500 manager. When Gibby got fired by the Jays, he didn't get a single interview for another MLB managerial position.
RealAccountant Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 This indicates to me that gibbons in doing a great job, not that he cost us the games really how so So production not leading to wins indicate that the manager is doing a great job. Jays should be a .600 team best on player production. Players produce or stop runs. Mangers turn those runs into wins and losses.
Mikeleelop Verified Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 Thats what you think. However how many people here were actually around to see Cito manage. Not many. Cito and gibbons are very similar. They both had weird allegiance to different guys Gibbons actually has devised much better lineup than cito
Mikeleelop Verified Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 really how so So production not leading to wins indicate that the manager is doing a great job. Jays should be a .600 team best on player production. Players produce or stop runs. Mangers turn those runs into wins and losses. Point is the players produce and stop runs and also win/lose the games Over the course of the season it will even out. Managers don't effect the outcome
RealAccountant Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 Point is the players produce and stop runs and also win/lose the games Over the course of the season it will even out. Managers don't effect the outcome Managers absolutely effect the outcome of the game, it is borderline nonsensical to say so otherwise. They might have lessor impact on games that are decided by 3-4 runs, but for games decided by 1 run, or 2 runs, they have a huge impact Last time I checked Jays were terrible in close games.
Yohendrick Pinango Buffalo Bisons - AAA LF Welcome to the big leagues, Yohendrick!!! Congratulations! Explore Yohendrick Pinango News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now