Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

3/3 - Jays vs. O's | 1:07 PM | Get Er Done | June 21


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 982
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
They also dont adjust for when 0 out 1st and 2nd, and the bunt is successful, meaning its not a sacrifice. Without at least removing those numbers, the first figure is inflated.

 

The 1st and 2nd no out bunt action does not always result in an out. It often results in a hit or another play.

 

You should really stop. You're embarrassing yourself.

Verified Member
Posted
You should really stop. You're embarrassing yourself.

 

You should really not reply. You're embarrassing yourself.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
The only thing greater than adding more runs in this inning would be adding them against a guy named Chaz.
Posted
You got to love how the Orioles went to their bench to summon a slow fat ass who also happens to be completely useless at everything else to pinch hit. Good decision.
Posted
That's a lot of cocks Ang. I think they should suck a big bag of black guys dicks though.

 

Do you prefer black dicks?

Posted
You should really stop. You're embarrassing yourself.

 

Really then defend the point. Anytime a 1st 2nd not out situation, where there is a bunt, and the result is not an out, helps the first figure

 

Even if you say that 15% of the time the sacrifice does not result in an out, that drastically changes the 1st number, as well as it supports the second number.

Posted
You got to love how the Orioles went to their bench to summon a slow fat ass who also happens to be completely useless at everything else to pinch hit. Good decision.

 

But Showalter is such an experienced manager! He knows how to win ballgames, unlike that idiot Gibbons.

Posted

First the useless throw to 2nd base in this game, now stealing 3rd base...

 

Bautista is playing mental games with himself again.

Posted
They also dont adjust for when 0 out 1st and 2nd, and the bunt is successful, meaning its not a sacrifice. Without at least removing those numbers, the first figure is inflated.

 

The 1st and 2nd no out bunt action does not always result in an out. It often results in a hit or another play.

 

Yes, and that's included in the 1.4 number... The point is that TRYING to give up an out there (which is what a bunt in that situation was) reduces the chances of scoring.

Posted
Why Bautista? So f***ing dumb.

 

The last time this happened Jose did it with 2 outs. You said it's ok with 1 out, but not 2. So why is he dumb this time with 1 out?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...