Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

3/3 - Jays vs. O's | 1:07 PM | Get Er Done | June 21

baubau

By baubau
in Toronto Blue Jays Talk

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 982
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

RealAccountant Dunedin Blue Jays

RealAccountant

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted
Are we seriously going back to Loup.

 

Does Gibby want to set the record for most losses by a reliever in a season.

 

Time to eat my crow then

 

But I'd rather be wrong and jays be successful.

Deadpool Buffalo Bisons

Deadpool

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted
4. Bringing Loup in again because blowing one game in this series wasn't enough.

 

Gibbons is f***ing up faster than I can type.

 

... Yeah, you should really stop now, you're not making a good case for your inclusion in the gene pool.

Orgfiller All-Star

Orgfiller

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted
Oh god why Loup...

 

And here comes Loup.

 

Awesome..Here comes another Loup meltdown

 

Loup coming in?....losing in 3....2.....1.....

 

loupy is poopy :(

 

Are we seriously going back to Loup.

 

Does Gibby want to set the record for most losses by a reliever in a season.

 

Well with Loup in Jay will be down 11-9 after 3 pitches. The guy is great with no one on base but with people on base he cannot handle the stress and pressure.

 

Loup coming in to blow another one. Great.

 

Loup and Cecil lurking. We're f***ed.

 

4. Bringing Loup in again because blowing one game in this series wasn't enough.

 

Gibbons is f***ing up faster than I can type.

 

nice control loup you bum

 

This is stupid

 

All of you idiots can go eat a bag of dicks.

TilsonBritoFan Draft Eligible

TilsonBritoFan

Verified Member
Posted
Posted
First and second with 0 outs results in 1.4279 runs (2015), second and third with 1 out results in 1.2892 runs (2015)

 

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/sortable/index.php?cid=1819115

 

Yeah but I'd be curious as to how those #'s look if its first and second 0 outs with a hitter of Goins ability coming up compared to same situation with meat of the order?

 

E.g. - 2015 Blue Jays with our 2-3-4 coming up 1st and 2nd 0 out I'd bet we'd be close to 2.0 runs. With bottom of the order its probably closer to 1 run.

Deadpool Buffalo Bisons

Deadpool

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted
You cant present those numbers objectively because they already include bunts. In order to have the right number, you must remove all butns out from the second figure, and then they can be compared.

 

Not relevant. You score fewer runs with second and third and 1 out than you do with first and second nobody out. The numbers show that.

glory Vancouver Canadians

glory

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted
... Yeah, you should really stop now, you're not making a good case for your inclusion in the gene pool.

 

You just said that Goins not bunting in that situation was the right call.

 

My case for inclusion in the gene pool (nice one) is still far ahead of yours.

fireballW Draft Eligible

fireballW

Verified Member
Posted
Posted
3-0 count and...................................... We f*** the O's :)

 

Love how 3-0 Buck says Young is a veteran enough hitter to make sure he swings at a good pitch, then 3-1 he swings at one that wasn't even close to close to the plate.

Deadpool Buffalo Bisons

Deadpool

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted
Yeah but I'd be curious as to how those #'s look if its first and second 0 outs with a hitter of Goins ability coming up compared to same situation with meat of the order?

 

E.g. - 2015 Blue Jays with our 2-3-4 coming up 1st and 2nd 0 out I'd bet we'd be close to 2.0 runs. With bottom of the order its probably closer to 1 run.

 

Even Goins fails to make an out over 1/4 of the time...

Deadpool Buffalo Bisons

Deadpool

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted
You just said that Goins not bunting in that situation was the right call.

 

My case for inclusion in the gene pool (nice one) is still far ahead of yours.

 

Well, facts and numbers back me, your ridiculous hate on for Gibbons is all that's backing you.

RealAccountant Dunedin Blue Jays

RealAccountant

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted
Not relevant. You score fewer runs with second and third and 1 out than you do with first and second nobody out. The numbers show that.

 

They also dont adjust for when 0 out 1st and 2nd, and the bunt is successful, meaning its not a sacrifice. Without at least removing those numbers, the first figure is inflated.

 

The 1st and 2nd no out bunt action does not always result in an out. It often results in a hit or another play.

LTR First Round Pick

LTR

Verified Member
Posted
Posted
All of you idiots can go eat a bag of dicks.

 

Loup has actually had bad luck, but nevertheless he's f***ed us multiple times.

 

Also... 1 batter sample size. Well played sir, well played.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

Become a Caretaker

  • Member Statistics

    20,996
    Total Members
    48,845
    Most Online
    ButchS
    Newest Member
    ButchS
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...