Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

GDT(2/3): Your Toronto Blue Jays @ Baltimore Orioles - Sanchez v Jimenez - 7:05 PM ET


Recommended Posts

Community Moderator
Posted
I think we're mostly concerned about the accounts that do nothing but post comments about bad ownership, bad players, bad manager, etc.

 

and I've been toasting those. if someone has 20 posts that are one long rant, they get cut from the vine. But they just create new accounts and come back like cancer

  • Replies 653
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
and I've been toasting those. if someone has 20 posts that are one long rant, they get cut from the vine. But they just create new accounts and come back like cancer

 

Yeah... I guess thats what happens with the popularity of this forum now. All the idiots flock here since it is the most active Jays forum on the internet, and we get more and more new posters each year.

 

It just feels like this place is a constant cesspool of negativity any time we are losing a game

Jays Centre Contributor
Posted
and I've been toasting those. if someone has 20 posts that are one long rant, they get cut from the vine. But they just create new accounts and come back like cancer

You have done a good job...the other mods seem to be posting way less this year.

Posted
One loss in a 162 game season and this place goes retarded. The desire to share ideas and opinions here is slowly dwindling. Troll accounts combined with punk sarcasm is becoming unbearable.
Jays Centre Contributor
Posted
One loss in a 162 game season and this place goes retarded. The desire to share ideas and opinions here is slowly dwindling. Troll accounts combined with punk sarcasm is becoming unbearable.

Problem is (as most message boards are the same) is a few posters attack opinions that differ from their own.

Posted
Yeah... I guess thats what happens with the popularity of this forum now. All the idiots flock here since it is the most active Jays forum on the internet, and we get more and more new posters each year.

 

It just feels like this place is a constant cesspool of negativity any time we are losing a game

 

The same posters here attack anyone and call for bans as soon as someone posts something negative or they dont agree with.

 

Why not ignore them? That would stop all the bickering.

Posted

Why was Pompey batting second again? He is projected to be the worst hitter on the team, so I don't understand why he is getting put in such high spots.

 

#mapleboner

Posted
The same posters here attack anyone and call for bans as soon as someone posts something negative or they dont agree with.

 

Why not ignore them? That would stop all the bickering.

 

Totally agree. As soon as anyone posts something negative they get called a troll unless it's in line with popular opinion (i.e. fangraphs). Do some people want this to be the rose coloured glasses forum? Seems like it.

Posted
Totally agree. As soon as anyone posts something negative they get called a troll unless it's in line with fangraph's negativity (ie Sanchez). Do some people want this to be the rose coloured glasses forum? Seems like it.

 

I know , its silly. Ignore it and it would never become an issue. That is a bigger issue then the negative trolls. Trolls are useless if ignored. You cannot censor negativity.

 

Its like they only want ten users on here and cannot handle differing views.

 

Let the mods deal with the obvious trolls.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Ah, thanks. But there are more moderators... o2cui2i is not on that list

 

Admin, GSnarls, Hurl, Chappy and o2cui2i.

Posted
So why the fack did we put in Redmond instead of Osuna? Game was very winnable still...

Probably because Redmond needed to get some work-in and it appears Gibby wants to limit Osuna to 1-2 inning outings. Despite the fact that Redmond only pitched 2 innings Gibby was likely looking for 3-4 innings hence Redmond and Hendricks combined for 4

Posted
The same posters here attack anyone and call for bans as soon as someone posts something negative or they dont agree with.

 

Why not ignore them? That would stop all the bickering.

 

Ban

Posted
Best lineup ever manages to get 1 hit. After the harassment I got for questioning why Pompey was in the 2 spot and not Martin.

 

How many hits did Martin have today?

Posted

Wait it's only the first week of ball and the Bluejays message board is melting. Let's be honest about first week judgements on players and this team. For instance are we more disappointed that our rookie #5 starter lost or by the fact that Jose

Bautista has more strike outs then Shanchez too! Lol

Old-Timey Member
Posted
What's funny is......Kershaw, Bumgarner (5 runs in less innings), and Kluber today all were as bad or worse than our #5 starter

 

Kershaw 6.1IP 6ER 3BB 5K 3.64 xFIP

Bumgarner 3IP 10H 5ER 0BB 4K 1.77 xFIP (<--.714 BABIP)

Kluber 6.1IP 7H 2ER 1BB 10K 0.92 xFIP

 

Sanchez......... 3.1IP 7H 3ER 2BB 1K 5.48 xFIP

Posted
Kershaw 6.1IP 6ER 3BB 5K 3.64 xFIP

Bumgarner 3IP 10H 5ER 0BB 4K 1.77 xFIP (<--.714 BABIP)

Kluber 6.1IP 7H 2ER 1BB 10K 0.92 xFIP

 

Sanchez......... 3.1IP 7H 3ER 2BB 1K 5.48 xFIP

 

Still, the actual in-game results were similar.

Jays Centre Contributor
Posted
Kershaw 6.1IP 6ER 3BB 5K 3.64 xFIP

Bumgarner 3IP 10H 5ER 0BB 4K 1.77 xFIP (<--.714 BABIP)

Kluber 6.1IP 7H 2ER 1BB 10K 0.92 xFIP

 

Sanchez......... 3.1IP 7H 3ER 2BB 1K 5.48 xFIP

 

Didn't mean to include Kluber....my point is still the same. Bad starts happen, if it's the norm something needs to change, but right now some people in here would be calling for Bumgarner to be DFA if he was on the Jays...people need to be patient (at this time)

Posted
So Gibbons put Valencia in the outfield for the first time in his career as a precautionary move since Jose was cramping? That seems a little odd as "a precautionary measure". I know the game was out of hand for all intents and purposes but I hope Jose's prognosis is not worse than they are letting on.
Posted
So Gibbons put Valencia in the outfield for the first time in his career as a precautionary move since Jose was cramping? That seems a little odd as "a precautionary measure". I know the game was out of hand for all intents and purposes but I hope Jose's prognosis is not worse than they are letting on.

 

Second straight game where that was done

Posted
Still, the actual in-game results were similar.

 

 

Kershaw, MadBum, Klubaa will be fine, the talent is there. Aaron isnt ready to be starting games in that level.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...