Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted

Could someone please explain the logic of this?

 

Take a career .227 hitter and put him in the two hole. Move down melkey and Bautista to get them fewer at bats

 

Please don't quote his recent SSS which he will not maintain

Posted

I have no idea why managers think the 2-hole scrub tactic works. Like it's not just going to result in automatic outs.

 

My only rationale is to spread out the scrubs a bit. The 6-9 blackhole that was going on for the WS and A's series was indefensible. At least this way the opposing pitchers don't get to turn on cruise control after they get the fifth hitter.

Posted
At least this way the opposing pitchers don't get to turn on cruise control after they get the fifth hitter.

 

Well actually they do.......:(

Posted

The Two Hole

 

The old-school book says to put a bat-control guy here. Not a great hitter, but someone who can move the lead-off hitter over for one of the next two hitters to drive in.

 

The Books says the #2 hitter comes to bat in situations about as important as the #3 hitter, but more often. That means the #2 hitter should be better than the #3 guy, and one of the best three hitters overall. And since he bats with the bases empty more often than the hitters behind him, he should be a high-OBP player. Doesn't sound like someone who should be sacrificing, does it?

 

--

 

Gibby bringing a butter knife to a gun fight.

Verified Member
Posted
The Two Hole

 

The old-school book says to put a bat-control guy here. Not a great hitter, but someone who can move the lead-off hitter over for one of the next two hitters to drive in.

 

The Books says the #2 hitter comes to bat in situations about as important as the #3 hitter, but more often. That means the #2 hitter should be better than the #3 guy, and one of the best three hitters overall. And since he bats with the bases empty more often than the hitters behind him, he should be a high-OBP player. Doesn't sound like someone who should be sacrificing, does it?

 

--

 

Gibby bringing a butter knife to a gun fight.

 

If only Tango's work was available in the public domain....

Posted
The Two Hole

 

The old-school book says to put a bat-control guy here. Not a great hitter, but someone who can move the lead-off hitter over for one of the next two hitters to drive in.

 

The Books says the #2 hitter comes to bat in situations about as important as the #3 hitter, but more often. That means the #2 hitter should be better than the #3 guy, and one of the best three hitters overall. And since he bats with the bases empty more often than the hitters behind him, he should be a high-OBP player. Doesn't sound like someone who should be sacrificing, does it?

 

--

 

Gibby bringing a butter knife to a gun fight.

 

This is a good description. Also it is y gibbons tried to get Bautista to bat second last year

Verified Member
Posted
Yes. 4th on team in OBP, next to Bautista, Edwin, Lind.

 

Are you actually that f***ing dumb?

Posted
Could someone please explain the logic of this?

 

Take a career .227 hitter and put him in the two hole. Move down melkey and Bautista to get them fewer at bats

 

Please don't quote his recent SSS which he will not maintain

 

John Gibbons:

 

http://venturebeat.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/give-it-time.jpg?w=600&h=303

Verified Member
Posted
Are you actually that f***ing dumb?

 

You act like you know what you're talking about but you don't suggest a better line-up. Seems all you can do is disagree and insult with no supporting facts. Dipshit.

Verified Member
Posted
You act like you know what you're talking about but you don't suggest a better line-up. Seems all you can do is disagree and insult with no supporting facts. Dipshit.

 

Fact: True talent .280 wOBA.

 

Fact: that's the worst in our starting lineup.

 

Fact: One of your top 2 hitters should hit 2nd.

 

Fact: the relevant citation to the accepted piece of research on this matter was already posted in this thread.

Posted
Are you actually that f***ing dumb?

 

You seem pretty dim yourself. I guess you are right and the Major League manager is wrong. Why do you pick on a new poster, your life that bad?

Verified Member
Posted
Fact: True talent .280 wOBA.

 

Fact: that's the worst in our starting lineup.

 

Fact: One of your top 2 hitters should hit 2nd.

 

Fact: the relevant citation to the accepted piece of research on this matter was already posted in this thread.

 

Is your attitude acceptable around here? It's funny that you try to argue this when Kawasaki batting 2nd just lead to a run.

Verified Member
Posted
You seem pretty dim yourself. I guess you are right and the Major League manager is wrong. Why do you pick on a new poster, your life that bad?

 

The major league manager is most definitely wrong. Your blatantly fallacious appeal to authority does nothing to further whatever argument you think you have.

Verified Member
Posted
Is your attitude acceptable around here? It's funny that you try to argue this when Kawasaki batting 2nd just lead to a run.

 

What do you think Kawasaki's ability as a hitter is going forward? As, throw out a triple slash.

Posted
You seem pretty dim yourself. I guess you are right and the Major League manager is wrong. Why do you pick on a new poster, your life that bad?

 

Lol

Posted
Is your attitude acceptable around here? It's funny that you try to argue this when Kawasaki batting 2nd just lead to a run.

 

Wait...did you just use a 1 AB sample size?

Posted
Happ still a starter, Kawasaki batting second... Gibbons tired of pretending he has a lineup worth playing and is trolling AA
Verified Member
Posted
Lol, this guy's posts read like a non-stop temper tantrum, it's pretty funny s***.

 

Not really.

Posted
Lol, this guy's posts read like a non-stop temper tantrum, it's pretty funny s***.

 

Who are you referring to here? lol

Verified Member
Posted
What do you think Kawasaki's ability as a hitter is going forward? As, throw out a triple slash.

 

Not sure you even know what you're arguing about anymore.

 

I said he gets on-base. Which he does, and he has. You said no. I proved it by example. You resorted to posting a condescending remark. I appreciate the frustration being a Blue Jays fan right now but there's really no need for that.

 

Thanks.

Posted
Not sure you even know what you're arguing about anymore.

 

I said he gets on-base. Which he does, and he has. You said no. I proved it by example. You resorted to posting a condescending remark. I appreciate the frustration being a Blue Jays fan right now but there's really no need for that.

 

Thanks.

 

He gets on base? What is your baseline for having an acceptable OBP, without resorting to a borderline useless 80 PA sample size?

Verified Member
Posted
He gets on base? What is your baseline for having an acceptable OBP, without resorting to a borderline useless 80 PA sample size?

 

You may not like it but many managers go by recent season and handedness stats to build their line-ups. Kawsaki OBP last 2 years vs. RHP: .341, .368... 250 PA.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...