Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 Just in case we're all sick of using Steamer as the bible.
Nox Verified Member Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 Just in case we're all sick of using Steamer as the bible. Oliver loves it some Giancarlo.
Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted December 5, 2013 Author Posted December 5, 2013 Oliver believes in Chris Davis (and Khris Davis). Seems it doesn't regress as heavily as Streamer.
TRM Verified Member Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 Oliver loves it some Giancarlo. So does everybody
Jays Verified Member Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 Steamer has Lawrie at 3.7 WAR and Oliver has him at 4.1. Fingers crossed.
Angrioter Old-Timey Member Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 http://www.bluejaysmessageboard.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=431&d=1386262041
Nox Verified Member Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 So they've projected every position player at 600 PAs? That's stupid/lazy.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 Steamer has Lawrie at 3.7 WAR and Oliver has him at 4.1. Fingers crossed. Please let it happen
Nox Verified Member Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 Remaining agnostic on playing time is such a cop out.
Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted December 5, 2013 Author Posted December 5, 2013 It's probably still beta projections. Steamer dumps SPs into IP buckets as well, 198 (max), 192, 189, 182, 65 IP for closers, etc. Surely there is a more elegant way to project IP.
Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted December 5, 2013 Author Posted December 5, 2013 Like for example, how do you project Shields for 192 IP when he hasn't gone under 200 in 7 years and has been under 215 only once?
Nox Verified Member Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 Like for example, how do you project Shields for 192 IP when he hasn't gone under 200 in 7 years and has been under 215 only once? RTTM, aging. Almost no pitcher should be projected for 200 innings.
Angrioter Old-Timey Member Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 Like for example, how do you project Shields for 192 IP when he hasn't gone under 200 in 7 years and has been under 215 only once? Project a different amount of innings to each pitcher is much work. Great job steamer.
Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted December 5, 2013 Author Posted December 5, 2013 RTTM, aging. Almost no pitcher should be projected for 200 innings. Well if it's "almost no pitcher," then if it's anyone it's Shields. My primary point being, shouldn't they maybe take a 3 year avg and RTTM that? Rather than just dumping him into a tier.
Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted December 5, 2013 Author Posted December 5, 2013 Kevin Kiermaier projected for 4.3 WAR with a 88 wRC+. How do they project defense this high with minor league numbers? I'm pretty sure Steamer had Burch Smith at 200 Ks the first week it was released, FWIW. They'll be refined as the off-season goes on.
Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted December 5, 2013 Author Posted December 5, 2013 Well if it's "almost no pitcher," then if it's anyone it's Shields. My primary point being, shouldn't they maybe take a 3 year avg and RTTM that? Rather than just dumping him into a tier. Which it appears that Oliver does (Shields @ 233 IP). Either that or Oliver is just some dude guestimating figures in his basement.
Jays Verified Member Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 Sano 24th in the league with 4.5 WAR You made me look up Sano to see if it was true. Can't believe it is. Thought you mistyped Cano at first.
Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted December 5, 2013 Author Posted December 5, 2013 That's a pretty cool tool for contract evaluations and dynasty owners.
Nox Verified Member Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 My primary point being, shouldn't they maybe take a 3 year avg and RTTM that? Rather than just dumping him into a tier. Yah, that's definitely better. But I think even with Shields' a 3 yr weighted avg regressed properly would take him to around 200 innings. Maybe slightly under. Lol @ 230 IP.
Nox Verified Member Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 Really though, projections more than 2 years our are all but useless. Uncertainty grows to levels where you might as well just project everyone to be average. Pretty sure what Oliver is doing here is very wrong. I feel like he's feeding his 5th year projection his 2nd 3rd and 4th year projection and treating it like it's true past data. You can't do that.
Nox Verified Member Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 It tells be Bogaerts will be a 5-6 win player by age-24 so I'm pretty OK with it. As a Bogaerts dynasty owner the idea of that does make my pants tighten.
KingKat Old-Timey Member Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 Which it appears that Oliver does (Shields @ 233 IP). Either that or Oliver is just some dude guestimating figures in his basement. Yep. Just some dude name Oliver.
Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted December 5, 2013 Author Posted December 5, 2013 Cano: 4.6 4.3 4.0 3.6 3.0 Based on that he'd be worth $25M AAV over the next 5 years.
flafson Verified Member Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 And Kratz on 3.1 WAR, maybe i shouldn't count too much into those numbers...
Nox Verified Member Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 Oliver thinks we have 4 league-average catchers. Does anyone else find C projections under both Steamer and Oliver to be really optimistic, or am I just being dumn. 29, well above average true talent catchers? Yah.... http://www.fangraphs.com/projections.aspx?pos=c&stats=bat&type=oliver&team=0&players=0
Angrioter Old-Timey Member Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 who the f*** is brett frantini and why does oliver think he's better than matt wieters and yan gomes? iftfy
Laika Community Moderator Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 So Oliver is dumb? Ok. Good to know.
Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted December 5, 2013 Author Posted December 5, 2013 So Oliver is dumb? Ok. Good to know. Or you could use it for established big leaguers like its intended and ignore the obvious bugs until the projections are finalized.
Arjun Nimmala Vancouver Canadians - A+ SS It's been slow going at the start of the season for Nimmala, but on Sunday, he was 3-for-5 with his 3rd home run and 3 RBI. Explore Arjun Nimmala News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now