Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted

It's probably still beta projections. Steamer dumps SPs into

IP buckets as well, 198 (max), 192, 189, 182, 65 IP for closers, etc. Surely there is a more elegant way to project IP.

Posted
Like for example, how do you project Shields for 192 IP when he hasn't gone under 200 in 7 years and has been under 215 only once?
Posted
Like for example, how do you project Shields for 192 IP when he hasn't gone under 200 in 7 years and has been under 215 only once?

 

RTTM, aging.

 

Almost no pitcher should be projected for 200 innings.

Posted
Like for example, how do you project Shields for 192 IP when he hasn't gone under 200 in 7 years and has been under 215 only once?

 

Project a different amount of innings to each pitcher is much work.

Great job steamer.

Posted
RTTM, aging.

 

Almost no pitcher should be projected for 200 innings.

 

Well if it's "almost no pitcher," then if it's anyone it's Shields. My primary point being, shouldn't they maybe take a 3 year avg and RTTM that? Rather than just dumping him into a tier.

Posted
Kevin Kiermaier projected for 4.3 WAR with a 88 wRC+. How do they project defense this high with minor league numbers?

 

I'm pretty sure Steamer had Burch Smith at 200 Ks the first week it was released, FWIW. They'll be refined as the off-season goes on.

Posted
Well if it's "almost no pitcher," then if it's anyone it's Shields. My primary point being, shouldn't they maybe take a 3 year avg and RTTM that? Rather than just dumping him into a tier.

 

Which it appears that Oliver does (Shields @ 233 IP). Either that or Oliver is just some dude guestimating figures in his basement.

Posted
Sano 24th in the league with 4.5 WAR

 

You made me look up Sano to see if it was true. Can't believe it is. Thought you mistyped Cano at first.

Posted
My primary point being, shouldn't they maybe take a 3 year avg and RTTM that? Rather than just dumping him into a tier.

 

Yah, that's definitely better. But I think even with Shields' a 3 yr weighted avg regressed properly would take him to around 200 innings. Maybe slightly under.

 

Lol @ 230 IP.

Posted

Really though, projections more than 2 years our are all but useless. Uncertainty grows to levels where you might as well just project everyone to be average.

 

Pretty sure what Oliver is doing here is very wrong. I feel like he's feeding his 5th year projection his 2nd 3rd and 4th year projection and treating it like it's true past data. You can't do that.

Posted
It tells be Bogaerts will be a 5-6 win player by age-24 so I'm pretty OK with it.

 

As a Bogaerts dynasty owner the idea of that does make my pants tighten.

Posted
Which it appears that Oliver does (Shields @ 233 IP). Either that or Oliver is just some dude guestimating figures in his basement.

 

Yep. Just some dude name Oliver.

Posted
So Oliver is dumb? Ok. Good to know.

 

Or you could use it for established big leaguers like its intended and ignore the obvious bugs until the projections are finalized.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...