GD Old-Timey Member Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 Actually, considering Ahrens is a 3B, we could have Ahrens at 3B, Schimpf at 2B, and move Lawrie back to catcher. Our holes would be filled right there. I should be GM This really isn't complete without Justin Jackson as our ace.
GD Old-Timey Member Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 SP- Buehrle SP- Dickey SP- McGuire SP- Romero SP- Jackson Could be a decent rotation, except Jackson would have to be stretched out as a starter in spring training. Chris King tweeted a few weeks ago that he has a major league arm. Because people named King are never wrong.
theblujay Verified Member Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 SP- Buehrle SP- Dickey SP- McGuire SP- Romero SP- Jackson Could be a decent rotation, except Jackson would have to be stretched out as a starter in spring training. Chris King tweeted a few weeks ago that he has a major league arm. Let's trade everyone and play those guys. I feel like it would work out better in the long run.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 Even the president of the Ryan Goins Fan Club (theblujay) would agree with me. His most important source (Steamer, +10 runs defensive mark-up for Goins) say so. Arencibia is bad, but only because he's been cast as a starter. There are many supporting player around the league (and inside our clubhouse) who would perform even worse as starters. While I believe 2B must be addressed, at this point C and 2B must both be addressed or this team is going nowhere. Arguing about which one is more important is completely pointless.
theblujay Verified Member Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 While I believe 2B must be addressed, at this point C and 2B must both be addressed or this team is going nowhere. Arguing about which one is more important is completely pointless. I think C and pitching are by far the most important to upgrade. We have a few options at 2B, but nothing at C and a of course pitching was a disaster this year.
Jays Verified Member Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 2B options internal: Izturis Goins Negrych Schimpf Don't forget our Japanese superstar.
flafson Verified Member Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 Thole is more valuable than Goins. If that was true then Goins is useless. The only value Thole seems to have is his glove with Dickey.
theblujay Verified Member Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 But Arencibia > Goins. But he's not. Goins is an excellent defender, JP is horrendous. Goins is probably even similar at the plate. JP had negative WAR, Goins didn't.
GD Old-Timey Member Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 It's hard to argue in Goins' favour here. Don't worry, he will anyways.
Laika Community Moderator Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 DRGAF what Steamer says, I think Goins is a meh bench piece at the very most but I'd still take him over Thole or Cibs, and I don't think it's even that close. I'd take Jimenez over Goins though. I agree with the earlier poster who said that 2B and C are both gaping buttholes that need to plugged. f***ing ugly positions. It's silly as hell to even argue about which one could be left alone. At the absolute very least, sign a couple of cheap buttplugs like Kelly Johnson or John Buck (or one of their peers).
gruber92 Old-Timey Member Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 f*** these projections. JPA f***ing stinks and has no business squatting behind a major league plate. Goins has the defensive ability to keep him employed in the MLB for years to come. Ask Johnny Mac.
gruber92 Old-Timey Member Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 I have to agree regarding A. J Jiminez having more value than Goins. I'd rather have Jiminez behind the plate with almost any average second baseman, rather than JPA behind the plate with Cano at second.
GD Old-Timey Member Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 I have to agree regarding A. J Jiminez having more value than Goins. I'd rather have Jiminez behind the plate with almost any average second baseman, rather than JPA behind the plate with Cano at second. I would take the latter. JPA + Cano probably = 5 wins, Jimenez + average B probably equals 3-4, but I'm way too lazy to actually look up any of that.
Laika Community Moderator Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 I would take the latter. JPA + Cano probably = 5 wins, Jimenez + average B probably equals 3-4, but I'm way too lazy to actually look up any of that. Money is a thing
GD Old-Timey Member Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 Money is a thing I figured he was talking about on field production solely.
gruber92 Old-Timey Member Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 I figured he was talking about on field production solely. Yes i was. JPA handling the ball as often as a catcher does is a recipe for failure,even with Cano at second. There is no way projections or numbers can factor in "the JPA factor". One would have to think the starting basis in improving would have to start with a capable catcher, regardless of any improvements in other areas. There are way too many variables a catcher brings and unfortunately JPA is a negative in every aspect, except for power. Too bad power is near the bottom of the relevant list when it comes to a catcher's credentials.
gruber92 Old-Timey Member Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 Totally agree, if we get a better starting catcher, the field boss if you will, you get better pitching and defense, if they're capable obviously. Lets hope AA sees it this way also.
theblujay Verified Member Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 You identified Steamer (with +10 runs defensively for Goins factored in) as your evaluation system of choice. Steamer has JP Arencibia at 1.8 WAR for next year. Are you saying that Steamer only matters when it agrees with you? Well Steamer has JPA as a great defender so I'm not really gonna buy that at all. We're talking about the guy who had a OBP hovering around .220
GD Old-Timey Member Posted October 11, 2013 Posted October 11, 2013 Even if you make JP below-average as a defender (after applying pos. adjustment) he'd still have a higher projected WAR than Goins over a full season. Define below average?
JSFIP Verified Member Posted October 11, 2013 Posted October 11, 2013 Define below average? King's overall quality as a poster
GD Old-Timey Member Posted October 11, 2013 Posted October 11, 2013 King's overall quality as a poster #SHOTSFiRED
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted October 11, 2013 Posted October 11, 2013 Yes i was. JPA handling the ball as often as a catcher does is a recipe for failure,even with Cano at second. There is no way projections or numbers can factor in "the JPA factor". One would have to think the starting basis in improving would have to start with a capable catcher, regardless of any improvements in other areas. There are way too many variables a catcher brings and unfortunately JPA is a negative in every aspect, except for power. Too bad power is near the bottom of the relevant list when it comes to a catcher's credentials. Jorge Posada was just as bad, or even worse than JP defensively. He was a good hitter but the Yankees still won what, 4 or 5 WS with him behind the plate? Just saying, don't go overboard.
Frenchsoup Verified Member Posted October 11, 2013 Posted October 11, 2013 Jorge Posada was just as bad, or even worse than JP defensively. He was a good hitter but the Yankees still won what, 4 or 5 WS with him behind the plate? Just saying, don't go overboard. Except jorge mashed and called a better game and didn't have the athlectism to do a 360 and toss it in CF like good old JP.
gruber92 Old-Timey Member Posted October 11, 2013 Posted October 11, 2013 Jorge Posada was just as bad, or even worse than JP defensively. He was a good hitter but the Yankees still won what, 4 or 5 WS with him behind the plate? Just saying, don't go overboard. Saying Posada was possibly worse than JPA defensively is going a bit overboard, wouldn't ya think? Besides, those WS Yankee teams were stacked, tons of baseball IQ to go along with talent. Jorge's offense neutralized a lot of his defensive innefinciancies. JPA is just a useless plug.
Angrioter Old-Timey Member Posted October 11, 2013 Posted October 11, 2013 Define below average? King's overall quality as a poster King has lost a lot of ground as a poster. He was good but "King Kalfus" and "Harvey the anormal one" caused a electric shot on his brain.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted October 11, 2013 Posted October 11, 2013 Saying Posada was possibly worse than JPA defensively is going a bit overboard, wouldn't ya think? Besides, those WS Yankee teams were stacked, tons of baseball IQ to go along with talent. Jorge's offense neutralized a lot of his defensive innefinciancies. JPA is just a useless plug. If you seriously ever watched Posada catch, he was really awful. I already said he was a great hitter, but my point was that your value from catcher doesn't have to be mostly on the defensive side. You don't need some elite defender in order to compete.
theblujay Verified Member Posted October 11, 2013 Posted October 11, 2013 Even if you make JP below-average as a defender (after applying pos. adjustment) he'd still have a higher projected WAR than Goins over a full season. So you'd rather have JPA or Thole over Goins?
TBJ12 Verified Member Posted October 11, 2013 Posted October 11, 2013 So you'd rather have JPA or Thole over Goins? I sure wouldn't. This is one of those situations where I would throw WAR out the window. Goins is clearly a better defender, baserunner and much more versatile than JP. Goins will never have the power JP has, but he'll likely talk more walks and have better at bats. I'm not really sure where JP's value comes from but I'm not buying into it. This doesn't mean I want Goins starting, but given the choice between Goins or JP, I'll take Goins every time.
Angrioter Old-Timey Member Posted October 11, 2013 Posted October 11, 2013 Nope. I'd rather have Goins on the team than JP. But I'd rather have JP as a full-time starter at catcher than Goins as a full-time starter at second. They're different statements. Sounds logical. JPA is more valuable than Goins undoubtedly but I prefer Goins bench role over JPA as starter.
The Cats Ass Old-Timey Member Posted October 11, 2013 Posted October 11, 2013 Nope. I'd rather have Goins on the team than JP. But I'd rather have JP as a full-time starter at catcher than Goins as a full-time starter at second. They're different statements. What!? Atleast Goins can supply us with good defense at his position to go with his below average offense. JPA supplies us with below average defense to go with his below average offense, and then he adds in a little bit more below average defense just because he's the giving type.
Arjun Nimmala New Hampshire Fisher Cats - AA SS The Jays have promoted the 20-year-old shortstop to Double-A New Hampshire! He hit .241/.362/.483 (.845) in his 23-game return to Vancouver. Explore Arjun Nimmala News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now