Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Old-Timey Member
Posted
raps with another really s***** start. like like complete crap in the first quarter.

 

It's a back to back post-Atlanta..

Posted
It's a back to back post-Atlanta..

 

there were absolutely s*** in almost every first half this year. It's not a "back to back" thing. they are horrible starters. Just have to hope they get it going before the lead gets to big.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
there were absolutely s*** in almost every first half this year. It's not a "back to back" thing. they are horrible starters. Just have to hope they get it going before the lead gets to big.

 

You're continually repeating something that has already been discussed every single game

Posted
You're continually repeating something that has already been discussed every single game

 

DUDE! you blamed the bad start on them being on a back to back and I responded.

 

Now I'll get back to watching the comeback.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
DD screws up 2 more put ins because he's too bust whining for a foul. get him off the floor.

 

You sound like those posters who complained about the bullpen all season for the Jays

Posted
You sound like those posters who complained about the bullpen all season for the Jays

 

our pen was great after they moved Castro/Cecil out of closer role.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Definitely gonna do a study on the significance of the scoring distribution if I can find the data
Posted
Definitely gonna do a study on the significance of the scoring distribution if I can find the data

 

how about assists/total baskets effect on total scoring? raps are 3rd worst in league.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
how about assists/total baskets effect on total scoring? raps are 3rd worst in league.

 

Do you mean assist rate? Idk, seems like it'd be pretty straight forward. Better players are better passers and will score more. It's not like you'd expect an inverse correlation. Not really what I'm getting at. Distribution is more interesting to me because everyone scores, and within a reasonably contained rate per 100 possessions, but the Raptors' way in which they distribute that with their turning it on in the 3rd and 4th is interesting. That usually isn't sustainable but it's been a while now.

Posted
Do you mean assist rate? Idk, seems like it'd be pretty straight forward. Better players are better passers and will score more. It's not like you'd expect an inverse correlation. Not really what I'm getting at. Distribution is more interesting to me because everyone scores, and within a reasonably contained rate per 100 possessions, but the Raptors' way in which they distribute that with their turning it on in the 3rd and 4th is interesting. That usually isn't sustainable but it's been a while now.

 

distribution rate can make teams better if they have 5 guys on the floor who can make shots. Hard to get a good points distribution if you have 2-3 guys taking bad shots.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
All of that was pathetic. The non-call, the shot, the insanely horrendous rebound by Scola, and the fact that you f***ing have Scola in the game in a rebounding situation.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...