You misinterpreted my whole post. I was and am saying there were writers saying that Ortiz should not be a first round HoF and then posted a list using WAR comparisons of recent first round HoF, showing Ortiz all the way at the bottom of the list.
I will try to post it, but this board always gives me issues with my pics.
David Ortiz should have been a first round HoF. Using a WAR vs his position playing peers, was an unjust comparison that was screwing with him.
Some highlights of just one article I remember seeing, below....
David Ortiz Had a Great MLB Career, but Not First-Ballot Hall of Fame Great
The easiest place to start for the sake of comparing Ortiz to that group is with wins above replacement or WAR, which provides a numerical figure for the number of wins a player was worth to his team above a replacement-level player over the course of his career.
Chipper Jones: 85.3
Ken Griffey Jr.: 83.8
Jeff Bagwell: 79.9
Frank Thomas: 73.8
Jim Thome: 73.1
Larry Walker: 72.7
Derek Jeter: 71.3
Barry Larkin: 70.5
Ivan Rodriguez: 68.7
Edgar Martinez: 68.4
Roberto Alomar: 67.0
Craig Biggio: 65.4
Mike Piazza: 59.5
Vladimir Guerrero: 59.5
David Ortiz: 55.3