I'm happy to admit the Gimenez trade hasn't worked out as well as it could have. The beauty with him though is the defense and base running raise the floor a lot.
We paid him $15M last year for 2.8 WAR and $10M in 2025 for 1.0 WAR in an injury ridden season. Even if you think defensive WAR isn't worth as much as offensive WAR, those results aren't terrible and certainly were not crippling. They almost highlight just how much surplus value he'd provide if he could be a 95 wRC+ bat. It shouldn't be difficult to see why this trade was made when he was entering his age 26 season and had 2 previous seasons with a wRC+ >95.
Based on the results to date, I'd be hard pressed to call this a massive failure. If this is one of the biggest complaints about the GM, then you're probably in a good place.
Moving forward, the contract gets more expensive. 3 more years with an AAV of $23M. He's still just entering his age 28 season, so physical decline shouldn't be an issue over the remainder of the deal and there is a possibility he's actually just entering his prime. I think we'd all like to see improvement with the bat. A wRC+ >90 would be great. 95+ and he's back to providing surplus value. If his bat remains in the low 80's, then he's probably providing 2.7 to 3 WAR for $23M. Not great, but still not crippling. If his bat drops below 80, then it gets painful.
Time to earn your paycheck Popkins.
Also - after watching the defense in the playoffs, I'm not sure I buy the narrative that defensive WAR is overvalued quite as much as I may have 6 months ago.
For the haters - how much WAR does Gimenez need to provide to justify $23M? What's the over/under? 3.5 WAR?