Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

glory

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    14,712
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by glory

  1. Pomeranz was great after going to the Brewers and becoming a reliever, but yeah, that's a lot of faith on 26 innings of sample size. At least the off season is picking up now.
  2. The O's are the O's.
  3. Profar would be great in the role Drury had last season. Looks like he played some LF, and graded out pretty well defensively, but everything else was in the infield, and he can play everywhere in the infield. With him being a FA after this season and Boras as his agent I'm sure he will want to go somewhere that will give him everyday AB's. The Jays could give that to him since he plays so many positions, although he wouldn't be able to play everyday at 2B/SS/3B regularly since those positions are covered. It would be amazing if he could somehow play an average CF, but that might be asking too much. A super utility role where he gets 450-500 PA seems doable. As I said, the non tender deadline is going to be interesting. Aguilar was just DFA. Villar is rumored to be NT'd. Maybe Profar and Treinen in Oakland. A bunch of interesting names are going to come out. The Jays having financial flexibility might come in handy here.
  4. Gibson gets 3/30 when he was projected to get a 2 year deal at a similar AAV. So the trend of free agents getting more than projected continues (good).
  5. I actually thought the Jays would get Gibson on a similar deal to what Happ got in 2016 (three years). Hopefully this means the Jays are aiming higher, but curious to see what he got from Texas.
  6. The non tender deadline will be interesting. Should be at least a few interesting arb3 players who become available.
  7. glory

    NBA Thread

    Yeah, they had to re-sign Butler and Reddick even if they didn't want to pay for it. Instead they chose Harris and Horford. Defensively they should be good, but Simmons can't shoot, Embiid can't work off of Simmons because of that, and they don't have the shooting around those two to help either one.
  8. glory

    NBA Thread

    The problem with the Sixers is that Simmons and Embiid don't mesh together at all. Without Butler there to create off the dribble for them, they'll find it difficult to score in the playoffs. What else can you say about the Raps? Don't have Lowry and Ibaka again, but still find a way to win. They have a legit 10 man rotation when those two come back (Lowry-FVV-OG-Pascal-Gasol starting and then Ibaka-Boucher-RHJ-Norm-Davis off the bench).
  9. Agreed, but you just know someone will do it.
  10. Has health issues, but numbers and velocity look good. Seems like a really good MiLB signing.
  11. Time for the "Jays sign Cole" thread.
  12. Yes free agents getting paid well is good for the game. Maybe it won't avoid an ugly labor dispute or work stoppage in two years, but it certainly won't hurt. Teams not trying to win is the biggest issue with the game right now aside from unfair pay for a player's early career (minors + first 6 years). Baseball will probably never be a mainstream sport again but it can still thrive as a regional sport if teams actually give a damn about trying to field a contender. Paying free agents rather than waiting until April to get them for pennies is a good start so far, even if it's only AA and the White Sox doing it so far.
  13. November 6th headline: "MLBPA Announces Investigation into Alex Anthopoulos' Comments About Free Agency" November 24th tweet: "Atlanta has made three of the four free agent signings this winter and now guaranteed $69 million to d’Arnaud, Will Smith and Chris Martin." Hey, as long as the players are getting paid, that's all that matters.
  14. Agreed. If the Jays were a middle of the order bat away from contention, then Edwin on a one year deal would make sense. That's not the case. I'm not particularly high on Fisher, Hernandez, Drury, McKinney, etc, and would get rid of them in a second to improve the quality of the roster, but reality is Atkins likes all of them and if even one of them turns into a late blooming core piece (or even a 2-3 win player), then that means more to the Jays than anything Edwin could possibly provide in 2020. Edwin is also 37 without the PED history (Cruz) so we can't just assume he's going to maintain his production. An alternative to signing a short term DH/1B is to trade for a blocked one in another org who may come cheaper because of it. Yankees have had some success with that recently. Someone like Dom Smith who is stuck behind Alonso in NY could be a reasonable trade target if you feel his 2019 turnaround is a sustainable change. I'm sure there are a bunch more on other teams.
  15. Abreu re-signs with the White Sox for 3/50. FA's getting paid so far, although it's only been two teams (Atlanta and White Sox).
  16. It might be due to lack of options. The CF free agent market sucks, and they don't seem to want to trade any actual prospects, so acquiring one in a trade (unless it comes in return for Giles) seems unlikely. I came into the off season expecting status quo (Hernandez in CF), but then there seemed to be a lot of talk about the Jays looking to add an OF, so my expectations shifted. Now I have no idea what they have in mind.
  17. This FA class is actually pretty good so wouldn't surprise me if most players end up getting paid well. We'll just have to wait a damn eternity for the signings to actually happen.
  18. Grandal to the White Sox. Four years, $73 million. Good for him to get that money. The one year deal last year pays off.
  19. Yeah, Mayza is going to miss all of 2020 and Shafer is not an asset. Don't mind those two being removed. There will be a lot of movement on the 40 man roster in the next few months as we add free agents, trades, etc.
  20. The deal was mostly considered “light”, not bad. So I don’t think that’s changed. Should have gotten a 3rd piece but might end up looking good for the Jays anyway.
  21. Based on what is out there, it appears Hatch is a lock to be kept, Espinal is very likely, and Wall/Palacios are borderline. As far as risks for being taken, mostly minor league RPs so nothing that stood out. The interesting part is that for every player they add they’ll need to drop someone. So who they drop will be something to watch for.
  22. I think an ideal situation would be the bulk of the off season being done in Nov-Dec, and then a lull with deals here and there in Jan-Feb heading into spring training. Right now it's the opposite, with moves starting in Jan/Feb and bleeding into March-beyond, which makes the off season feel unbearably long. You want to feel some level of excitement about potential signings, trades, etc, . That just isn't there anymore. Some of that might be Boras having so many clients, and he waits and waits and waits before his clients sign, but obviously there is a larger problem within baseball that needs to be addressed in the next CBA. Seriously, it's almost Thanksgiving and so far we got the Chase Anderson trade, and two relievers signing with the Braves. I can't think of anything else that has happened. That's insane.
  23. Yeah, no incentive for most teams to sign free agents when they don't value wins in 2020. I feel like the Jays can benefit from this the longer it drags on, but it's not going to make for a fun off season.
×
×
  • Create New...