I actually don't have strong feelings about the guy as a person but he is objectively a ******** and having a two cent brain does factor into valuation. You can't separate his volatility as a person from his volatility as a fantasy asset. The benchmark I'm using here is Yasiel Puig. I'm pretty sure there was discussion about how we'd handle a player who is already considered a volatile asset and the sentiment was that there's a certain risk baked in to owning Puig and that you just have to live with it if something goes wrong. Well if there's no insurance on Puig why would there be insurance on a lesser player with worse character issues? And even if there was insurance, what would that insurance even be? Is the gap between having Ventura and having nothing really bigger than the gap between Jose Fernandez and the compensation he earned? I'd argue that it's much smaller in fact.