Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Terminator

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    21,869
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    111

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Terminator

  1. Everth Cabrera non-tendered. He could be a guy at 2B.
  2. What the hell happened to his UZR? Inside Edge didn't think he was too bad.
  3. Morosi is the worst baseball writer out there IMO. I had to stop following him because his tweets are so incredibly annoying.
  4. I don't think an in-game injury is very concerning. The odds are low and if it happens you just yank the DH and pinch hit for the pitchers the rest of the game. Even IF that happens, it's not guaranteed to cost the game. You could be up by 6 runs when it happens or down by 6 and the injury doesn't affect the outcome. Or the injury could happen in the 8th and you wouldn't even need to pinch hit.
  5. Yeah I read that as well.
  6. I like this deal for Boston although I'd like it more if they signed him to play 3B.
  7. How often does that happen though? Not enough to even factor it in really IMO. I think it'd give the team a lot of roster flexibility as it basically gives you an extra roster spot - with Jaso among your starting 9 you could then have 4 bench players and none of them would have to be a C.
  8. Jaso would be a good acquisition. Unlike others, I wouldn't mind him being the backup C as well as the primary DH.
  9. Idk, Bruce was awful last year. One of the worst players in the bigs and his projections aren't great for this year either.
  10. Yeah this isn't a bad idea. Offer him a strong five year deal and if he takes it, good. But make the Sox go that extra year if they want him.
  11. Yeah I knew I'd forget some people. Jays apparently in on some of them. But my second point still stands.
  12. Oh for sure. Everyone shits on him because he's fat but at least he's young and he's also pretty damn good.
  13. And some of those guys may not be on the team (see Vernon Wells) and players signed in 2019 can also be signed to backloaded contracts. There is a reason almost every contract signed is backloaded; it's the smart thing to do.
  14. Who on the market is a clear improvement though? Lester (who the Jays are in on apparently) but who else? A lot of the guys out there aren't much better than what we have. Also, it's clear why he's focused on position players. He's trying to get replacement level players like Navarro and Goins out of the lineup.
  15. Yeah I think that really helps mitigate the concerns about his conditioning A LOT. For heavier players he probably will start his decline years earlier than most but a 5 year deal isn't going to be paying for too many of those decline seasons, if any. I think there are probably better ways to spend the money but there are also plenty of ways to spend that money worse.
  16. Well AA isn't going to offer anything more than a 5 year deal which would lock him up from his Age 28-32 seasons. I know he's fat but it's not like he's also old.
  17. Interesting the Howarth would say that. He seems pretty credible right? The problem is if we trade him we will have to do something to replace those 215+ innings you can pencil him in for.
  18. Interesting. I wonder what Beane's angle is.
  19. I don't have time but if the season ended today this is what the starting defense would look like? C: Martin 1B: EE 2B: Travis 3B: Lawrie SS: Reyes LF: Pillar/Dirks CF: Pompey RF: Bautista
  20. I wouldn't mind bringing in Chase Headley.
  21. Here's a picture of him after getting hit in the face with a pitch. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BlmdJqWCEAAcpls.jpg
  22. Yeah either that or the Jays have 9 guys in the Top 100? lol I think you are right.
  23. I heard he had some sort of injury to begin the season. Not sure if that has anything to do with the numbers but what I read was that the timeframes of the injury healing and his uptick in production were similar. That could all be a bunch of BS but I did read it somewhere.
  24. This is a good point although Dombrowski seems to have a different motive this offseason in which he appears hellbent on winning in 2015.
×
×
  • Create New...