Jump to content
Can the Blue Jays bounce back against the Cubs? Come join our game thread! ×
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

John_Havok

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    20,918

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by John_Havok

  1. John_Havok
    Man he'd look good in a Jays uni this season...too bad they're pussies.
  2. John_Havok
    Paid? Highly unlikely for Chinese preteens. That would take them away from the Nike factory.
  3. John_Havok
    Yes, i agree with that general idea, but when youre polling about a specific sport and a player with a certain team.... why would i care about people's opinions that probably dont even follow baseball? Like, lets say for example I was the Dodgers and wanted to get a feel for the general feeling around LA baseball fans about Bauer, I wouldnt care if I mailed a survery out to a specific % of every demographic, I would only care about the baseball fan demographic.
  4. John_Havok
    Glad to see they grabbed a catcher for AAA, the Jays are really thin at catcher in the minors now
  5. John_Havok
    PLease elaborate
  6. John_Havok
    There's so much wrong with your statement I'm not sure where to begin. Of the 12+ million people in the greater LA area, putting up an online poll for anyone to answer is pretty much the definition of random
  7. John_Havok
    One of the major newpapers down there did a poll, got nearly 20,000 fan reponses and it was 51% to 49% in favour of the Dodgers keeping him. I wouldnt have expected so many people to actually do a poll like that let alone turn out in Bauers favour.l
  8. John_Havok
    Anyone lese thinknig thelonger it takes the Dodgers to annoucen anything related to Bauer, the more likely they might actually keep him?
  9. John_Havok
    Excellent. If only he could hit the strike zone with them. That said, sign every functional arm that throws triple digits and hope to hell 1 of them figures it out.
  10. John_Havok
    They had to keep him, if they let him walk it would be a terrible look for the franchise. Now they can point to him and say "see we are serious!"
  11. John_Havok
    Good times were had by all.
  12. John_Havok
    I would be totally fine with Otto Lopez.
  13. John_Havok
    s***, yep, was looking at a different split column on Laureano and had the 2 mixed up. There really are a lot of 4th OF options out there, its just a matter of whehter they want to be part time or not
  14. John_Havok
    Theyre somehwat kidding, with multiple people married and having kids, the available time to get together just faded.
  15. John_Havok
    Really hard to say on Giles, he only faced 18 batters. Fastball averaged 94.8 (career avg 97.1) slider was 84.1 (86.4). Struck out 6, walked 4.
  16. John_Havok
    The luxury threshold only matters at the end of the year. All that matters is how much money a team actually spent on salary by the time the regular season is over. Where they start at the beginning of the season doesn’t matter
  17. John_Havok
    Yeha, i was just adding on in case anyone was wondering what his projected salary might be. The Jays are probably right up against the luxury tax right now, so i wonder if they would really want to go over in order to add a guy like Ramon .. or even Pollack. I know we've heard the lip service from the top saying that the tax isnt a barrier, but lets be real, if the options are go over my 2 million and have Laureano, or stay under and don't get him, i'd vote to stay under. I would only want to go over if it was a significant add. No point in taking penalties for being just slightly over.
  18. John_Havok
    3.6 Million projected arb salary too, wouldnt be a big hit
  19. John_Havok
    If you could get Laureano without taking away from the current roster, its a good get. The only reason I balk at trading Biggio is because all last season all we heard about was how light we were on LH hitting, so .. trading one away doesnt really make sense. There's still only going to be 2 Lefties in the lineup on a regular basis as is. Yes, in a vaccum Biggio for Laureano is very defensible, i just dont think it's the best way to fill the need of the 4th OF, which is really even debateable that the guy has to play OF. Getting any kind of lefty masher IF or OF would be fine with this roster's positional flexibility.
  20. John_Havok
    Exactly. Many defensive metrics rely on # of chances and how difficult those chances are. Maybe a guy never gets a ton of 4 or 5 star chances, and even if they don't convert many into outs, well, they were never supposed to make that many in the first place. Plus, you don't get really get credit for making the 1 star plays, since... everyone should make those plays. It's the 3 Star plays and their percentage of out conversions that make a really big difference. If a player gets a disproportionate # of 3 star chances and does even slightly better than average on them, that system would rank that player very high defensively.
  21. John_Havok
    I dunno, Ramon doesnt really mash lefties (107 wRC+ career), plays ok D and average power. Strikes out a ton, walks less than league average. Id rather just spend money on AJ Pollock. He actually hits lefties much better (130 wRC+ career), and doesn't defend that much worse. Just keep him from facing RHP as much as possible and he's a far better bench option IMO. Plus if your trading Biggio, there goes that extra LHB they'll end up needing on the bench.
  22. John_Havok
    Yeah, it's not somethign that really makes sense with really small sample sizes and total runs scored/allowed over 162 games is not even really that big of a sample size. There's any number of ways to present the game to game #'s ... if you blow a team out 10-0 one game then lose 2-1 the next... you outscored your opponents 11-2 but only went 1-1. If someone was not looking at W/L and just a 2 game run total it would be natural to assume the team that scored 11 runs and only gave up 2 would be far more likely to have won both games.
  23. John_Havok
    Exaclty. Yes, the offense may be slightly worse than last season but its not like the Jays will fall off a cliff. They'll be fine
  24. John_Havok
    Yankees are the biggest wildcard in there. No way you can project Judge to repeat his seasons and if he doesn’t, where’s all the offense going to come from? Stanton will be hurt half the season, Rizzo is good but not great, Donaldson is cooked, LeMahieux is more of a contact guy and will probably be hurt again at some point…Trevino, IKF and Hicks are all limp dicks to average. Unless Pereza and Oswaldo come up and shoot out of the gate like the second comings of Jeter and Bernie Williams I don’t see where they’re going to score all these runs. Pitching they are pretty good up front in the rotation though.
  25. John_Havok
    Like I said I stopped listening when they both had their #1 picks as an NL team. The ajays never even came up as a team they considered as top 5 and just thought other teams were better. I don’t get it, Teo is a loss, but Gurriel isn’t. Varsho’s projection offsets a bunch of Teo’s loss, so I just struggle with the complete lack of consideration for the Jays being a top 5 offense when there’s no real reason to think they’re suddenly going to take a giant step backwards. It’s possible these guys were not factoring in gains from baserunning that should occur this season with the pitch clock and limited throw overs to 1b. I see the Jays benefitting quite a bit from that while some other teams won’t see large differences.
×
×
  • Create New...