Laika

can i f***ing pick yet erijgrqejgr

veto

So you made a decision to spend money on something you can afford and just wish it was cheaper. Gotcha. I don't see a policy argument there, though. i am choosing to not be a mod today

Why should you be able to? What is the policy argument for giving that additional tax break to rich people? Anyway, in Canada I believe there are ways to deduct a good chunk. You can account for some of it as child care (deductible) and if it's a primarily religious institution a higher percentage may be deductible.

How can you honestly say this? Who the f*** are these people? Hockey prospects don't exist. Some of these guys might crack a lineup some day.

It looks like three players did it in MLB this year, perhaps this was a one year blip due to the different roster rules. Before that it apparently only happened twice - Mark Kiger and Adalberto Mondesi. Not sure what the deal was with Kiger but I can see it happening with Mondesi types who can be thought of as pure pinch runners. It's always been uncommon but there in hockey. Google says guys like Cherry, Iginla, Hull, McAvoy, Makar, Nick Robertson, Pearson, Tanev, Kreider, Mark Stone, Tom Wilson, Jannik Hansen, Doug Janik all share this debut quirk.

Couple weird things there, Jim. Crawford sucks but also... who is trying to squeeze value out of Andrelton Simmons outside of a 30 team league? Should've just dropped Andrelton for JP, they are basically fungible replacement level SS assets.

No, the DDL rules specifically say "service time". I don't think the issue has ever come up in the baseball leagues though - baseball players basically never debut in the playoffs. Either way, it looks like this league has a different set of rules for this stuff and maybe it makes sense because for one reason or another hockey teams do sometimes debut players in the playoffs.

Is this your fault though for not clarifying? Obviously I don't know how this league works but in the baseball leagues we look at service time which would not count playoff games as experience.

Can't help but cringe at some of these woke thoughtpieces coming out about Trevor Bauer, work ethic, and race. We like in a big, never-ending version of the Breakfast Club; people just see other people in "the simplest terms and most convenient definitions" based on the observer's station in life. https://cupofcoffee.substack.com/p/cup-of-coffee-november-12-2020

Nordekes want Caleb Addison. can someone email the next guy

I smell a huuuuuge extension

Nordekes want Jan Mysak

Problem for MLB is they can't have their cake and eat it too. The black kids like basketball, the old white guys like baseball and NASCAR. If MLB turns its sport into the batflip pimping Tim Anderson / Marcus Stroman festival we all want to see, MLB loses a chunk of their core old white viewership. Just like Twitter does not define a country's politics, Twitter does not define general fan interest in baseball. As much as Twitter loves Yasiel Puig, lots of baseball fans do not.

If the thing they are doing is the bare minimum, done mostly for optics, then there really isn't. The thing they are doing might even be worse than doing nothing at all! who knows!

they have big butts

Les Nordekes are floored that you had your eye on this sleeper goalie

brother wants Alexander Romanov if he is available

I think this discussion on race in sport is very interesting. Everyone is making valid points. I think it would be smart long-term marketing for baseball to really focus on making the sport affordable and accessible. When people say baseball is a "white man's game" they aren't intending to talk about the athletes and the other participants... they are talking about the fans. I despite quota-based analysis. I don't agree that MLB needs to hit some magic percentage of black participation. I also don't agree that MLB has any social obligations here. There are certainly things they could do more intelligently from a marketing perspective and those things in turn would improve the optics. Also, what are we really talking about here. Are we talking about MLB turning Kyler Murray into a baseball player rather than a football player? Or are we talking about baseball as a whole providing opportunities to low-income athletes who otherwise would not make it in any sport. These are very different things. In short I agree with connnorp more than thehurl.

Nordekes want Marco Rossi

The first two picks have already been posted here so I think the draft order / spreadsheet just needs to be put together?

My comments were directed more towards Grant, who was essentially sub-posting me by saying that money would be "wasted" on guys like Quintana and Richards, if it comes to that. I think the team would still benefit quite a bit from an SP4 type, regardless of whether or not they can reel in a big top-of-the-rotation fish. Depth is a function of quantity and quality. The Jays do have more names of some quality than they have had in some years, which is good.

People saying the depth is fine and the Jays only need one front of the rotation arm are not appreciating the risk profile of the current depth chart. This is NOT good depth behind a couple of bankable mid rotation horses. This is NOT good depth behind a Ace and the old reliable Tanner Roark. Ryu - injury risk, doesn’t chew innings regardless Pearson - injury and performance risk Ray - sucked in 2020 Roark - sucked so hard in 2020 he doesn’t deserve a rotation spot Stripling - sucked in 2020 Kay - sucked in 2020 Hatch - wasn’t even necessarily a good reliever last year, at least by some peripherals Borucki - see Hatch’s note. Troubling walk rate. Also an injury risk. Merryweather - there are multiple nails in his SP coffin now, right? Murphy - prospect with big injury risks and other issues (delivery history) Zeuch - zoinks.... Thornton - obvious note Murray/Manoah/Woods-Richardson - not realistic to count on them I like most of the above players and think some of them will be good, even in 2020, but c’mon. Nobody should want to just be rolling out Stripling, Roark, and Ray as uncontested starters right out of spring training. In an ideal world those three are competing for starts behind Ryu, a healthy Pearson, a pitcher about as good as Ryu, and someone decent and reliable. In an ideal world Toronto has the luxury of not trying to keep all of Merryweather, Borucki, and Hatch as starters. Some of them might benefit from role clarity A lot of the young SP guys who saw time in 2020 deserve for the sake of their development several turns in AAA as regular starters

I think they will try to add two more SP. Someone like Shoemaker/Smyly/Archer on a one year deal, and then someone for the top part of the rotation. They will try for Bauer, Paxton etc. but it might not work out if the stars don't align. If they don't end up with a big fish I think they'll still add someone for the middle of the rotation, maybe someone like Odorizzi or a veteran like Garrett Richards or Quintana on a pillow contract. Stripling and Ray can come out of the pen if the Jays are blessed with not facing injuries in spring. They don't necessarily need to be penciled into the starting 5. Same for Roark...

But why would you even do that? This is a baseball contract. We have WAR projections, performance histories, and reasonable ideas of what the cost of a win is. Game theory is not applicable and nobody needs a decision matrix to realize that a contract could either work out or not work out.