Laika

So to defend Charlie... Toronto is a different team than New York. Different personnel. Toronto guys may have already been struggling this year with putting too much pressure on themselves. Maybe his approach to things is good for his team right now Give him the benefit of the bongos

I read this and my pee pee shrank

Yeah salad is for losers. You get fatter eating salad because the dressing is probably s*** then you aren't satisfied so you snack like crazy. Kirk just needs more steak

I'm not sure Gurriel has much value.

I meaaaannnnn Moreno is amazing and Jansen's value is peaking offensively and the team could really use pitching sooooo

Pathetic talent gap on display Montgomery is their #5 basically and he is so legit Toronto's middle relievers are useless against good hitters

gotchu fam

discuss the game in this game day thread

Monday

Ottttttooooooooooo Loooooooopezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz the next Santiago Espinal

connor, you are just not mentally equipped to have discussions about stuff like this IT'S OKAY THOUGH WE ALL HAVE THINGS WE ARE GOOD AT ALLAH LOVES YOU NO MATTER WHAT

You could just listen to people talk about the sport. It's all pretty obvious if you have any brain cells. Have fun in Morocco.

And you don't CARE about the anecdotes, duh. The questions are (generalizing to make the point): A: If we have 1000 pitchers throw at 95% intensity (average) for 110 pitches per outing, how many would blow their arms out in the first six years of their career? B: If we have 1000 pitchers throw at 80% intensity (average) for 110 pitches per outing, how many would blow their arms out in the first six years of their career? C: If we have 1000 pitchers throw at 95% intensity (average) for 80 pitches per outing, how many would blow their arms out in the first six years of their career? Assume the answer under A is 300 pitchers and under B it's only 150 pitchers. The Verlanders and Nolan Ryans - the unicorns - are still going to exist and probably survive and buck all the trends under any paradigm of usage. But if you need your pitchers to throw like demons to get people out and limiting their volume (option C) helps you keep them healthy during team control (say only 150 pitchers die during the first 6 years again, like the old days) then it might make economic sense to do that. It might make strategic sense to do that.

Verlander was famous for ramping up as games went along. He used to start games throwing 93 and finish them sitting 99/100...

You are leaving your son? Eyes on what matters man You don't need to get your dick wet anymore. You're old. Just jerk off twice a day and die alone.

Read better

I think if they non-tender Tapia next year they do save like $6M

Toronto will win by 5 runs

well I have nice nuts yours are gross

the percentages are for illustration only, I have know idea what the actual intensity differences would be. I am making a general point about pitching effort and how that has changed over time. It's a generalization on purpose... I don't really care if Nolan Ryan or someone else as an anecdote threw at 100% intensity all the time and still made it through a 300 win career by survivorship bias

Absolutely, everything is harder Pitchers have to throw these wicked sliders at 100% arm speed nowadays. And some of them have to throw like 60% breaking balls to make it...

I think so but maybe it's closer than I assume You'd have to look at both UZR or the OAA from statcast and positional adjustments

The Toronto Blue Jays should have traded Randal Grichuk for Sandy Alcantara there, I said it.

Well let's not be crazy. Gurriel is definitely the worst OF on the team.

Grichuk had negative or zero value though. Toronto basically fleeced the Rockies for that prospect...