Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Laika

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    38,553
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    90

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Laika

  1. okay, updated Explanation B Explanation B: Chris Bassitt meant that the front office / organization is "unfixable." The Jays front office asked their media wing to do damage control. The PR team had a sit down with Bassitt and told him he needed to spin this. Bassitt, who is very brave and willing to slam the front office in interviews, suddenly lost his spine and agreed to spin it and throw specific players under the bus. Two media lackeys flew in and did an interview with Bassitt, with the PR team having already vetted the answers. This was then published. Phew - player criticism of the front office successfully swept under the rug (at least, in the eyes of all the sheeple who do not think critically and wear blinders all the time). But it is important to point out that while Zwelling and Davidi are obviously Rogers shills/lackeys, the intrepid and heavy Jeffrey Blair, also a Rogers employee, is for some reason not and he is allowed to put forward any narrative he wants on his programming. Remember, Jeff Blair = gospel, Zwelling and Davidi = corporate shills. Nevermind that they all work for Rogers and that Davidi wrote the article and was interviewed by Blair. Don't think too hard about this. Don't actually read the text of the Blair interview, just let your body react to the tone of it. That's the way. Name your kids Elon and Remington. Never drink tapwater, they put microbots in the Flouride. Chemtrails etc.
  2. He is going to be 3B eligible for a while in dynasty leagues. Wow! I don't own him anywhere sad
  3. Maybe if he agrees to a pay cut
  4. I feel like they hired him to be a veteran presence for John Schneider on the bench And then Donny Baseball's dripping testosterone took over, Ross wilted into a corn cob and could not deny him, and Mattingly succeeded in taking over the entire offensive programming / game planning / coaching systems top to bottom
  5. Joe Mauer was a 28 HR talent who had chronic groundball issues!
  6. What are your parameters? These kinds of guys definitely aren't hitting .290 anymore but some of them still exist. Some of them are less prominent because they platoon. But if you scan for 11%+ BB%, ISO of .170 or less, 1B types you do find LaMonte Wade, Nate Lowe, certain Josh Bell seasons. Yandy Diaz before the power spike. Ryan Noda (RIP). Ji Man Choi. Nolan Schanuel might be one. And if you just adjust their AVG for era, it might be the same. I dunno. From 1999 to now the MLB wide batting average has gone from .271 to .244
  7. Mattingly is doing work this year Vlad is back Varsho 100 wRC+ despite some of the worst peripherals in baseball IKF was somehow 116 wRC+ pre trade Clement hitting .268 and almost at 100 wRC+ Horwitz very good Springer sucks but is probably close to the best version of his pathetic 34 year old self considering the loss in power (5 mph off his maxEV in one year) Kirk was lost but has found himself Wagner is a god rookie Jimenez good so far as rookie Justin Turner clung to relevancy with Toronto (110 wRC+) long enough to fetch something in a trade before cratering with Seattle as expected (77 wRC+) The blemishes are: - Barger, maybe he just sucks - Schneider - Bichette but blame Bo and his legs - Biggio, you can't fix a guy like that
  8. Right, I am using colourful language. But it IS less likely. And it's more than just a disagreement about human nature, because explanation B is in fact a weird interpretation of Bassitt's original interview that makes less sense even if you just ignore the whole corporate bad guy ad hoc. So it's a more complex explanation for two reasons. #1 it's a less logical conclusion based on the initial interview (like one of those logic questions where one answer is "more correct" than the others but neither is obviously wrong) and #2 it now requires a Rogers/PR/Media mini-conspiracy.
  9. sample size in 2024 is meaningless but he has a 1.089 OPS when starting at 3B
  10. Bo's obvious decline in athleticism
  11. I don't think it's a question of unreasonable vs. reasonable. It's a question of likely vs. less likely; how people will ignore Occam's Razor because of their preconceptions. Explanation A: Chris Bassitt meant that certain players on the team have characteristics that are "unfixable" Explanation B: Chris Bassitt meant that the front office / organization is "unfixable" Justification for A being more likely: - player commentary generally speaking is more likely to be related to the team - players CAN have objectively unfixable characteristics like age, injury history, lack of physical tools. front offices really don't unless you assume a flawed executive cannot be fired. - Bassitt even says in the interview that he wants to "protect his teammates" -- this makes it seem quite likely that what he would say if being candid would be a criticism of the teammates. I can't see how him saying the front office is bad would harm his teammates. - it would be extreme for a player in Bassitt's context to call the organization / front office "unfixable." It would be a Milton Bradley on a one year deal soundbite. However, some people get boners about the idea that the player was slamming the front office that they hate so they see it through a different light (explanation . The only real contextual information that supports B is that the interview began with a discussion/question that was about front office moves (Ohtani, pivoting, etc.) So, that's the initial disagreement. A is more likely. The B people accuse the A people of being sheeple, etc. Luckily this time, the player almost immediately was asked to clarify his statements. It became obvious that A was right. Now the only chance the B people have is to add on some ad hoc explanation. This is where you can basically throw them in with flat earthers. Oh, your experiment failed? The earth still seems round? Time for some more ********. Now we have this: Explanation A: Chris Bassitt meant that certain players on the team have characteristics that are "unfixable." He affirmed this in a subsequent interview. Explanation B: Chris Bassitt meant that the front office / organization is "unfixable." The Jays front office asked their media wing to do damage control. The PR team had a sit down with Bassitt and told him he needed to spin this. Bassitt agreed to spin it and throw specific players under the bus. Two media lackeys flew in and did an interview with Bassitt, with the PR team having already vetted the answers. This was then published. Phew - player criticism of the front office successfully swept under the rug (at least, in the eyes of all the sheeple who do not think critically and wear blinders all the time). I have been laughing non-stop since this began. It's basically a litmus test for dingleberries.
  12. Hahahahahahaha
  13. 85 Stuff+ he is COOKED and it's a miracle that he has a decent ERA/FIP
  14. He sort of gets the yips on throws and that might make the trad coaching staff hesitant to label him a starting infielder but yes he is a total stud almost better at baseball than, for example, ryan mcmahon or maybe colt keith
  15. All I know is that this is the list right now: Team Science Laika Brownie Eat My Shatkins BatFlip Omar Team Flat Earth, everything is a conspiracy, aliens knocked up my sister, I swear they aren't hemorrhoids no come back Jays Blue L54 connorp Jays24 Team completely forgiven because he knows when to admit defeat Stangstag
  16. Hit tools aren't even comparable career contract rate of 80% vs 66.9% And Bo actually swings more often (gets thrown way more strikes of course) There is a universe where Bo Bichette ages okay and in that universe he probably slides to 2B or 3B, plays okay defense there, and hits like Nick Castellanos. Maybe with a bit more AVG even.
  17. It's his platform year. He had every reason to be a baby this year and sulk for a trade, but he can't do that next year. I'd just hold him if the return isn't there.
  18. All I can think of in recent history is the Jesse Winker trade to Seattle He was coming off a good year but he was an obviously flawed player with a track record of injury problems, fringe power, platoon problems.
  19. Feels like the best they can do would be similar to the Teoscar package. Aaron Swanson and Erick Macko.
  20. Yeah dude it must be the more complicated explanation
  21. What's he worth anyway? Even if there was no drama his season has been horrendous
  22. Not reading all that Sorry not sorry that you were wrong and looked stupid, again and immediately Stay in school
  23. Derek & Cavan & Daulton & Joey A proud Blue Jays tradition. Lefties that can't hit.
  24. LMAO where are my flat earthers now??? f***ing idiots. Not even reading comprehension to understand Harry f***ing Potter.
×
×
  • Create New...