As I understood it, the intent of the rule was to give owners some hope of not being set back years in the event that a franchise cornerstone died tragically (which I agree with - we do this for fun, and losing a Fernandez or Taveras is crippling, on top of being very sad). I never thought those decisions were precedent for attaching a compensation value to every player that dies. It sucks that it happened, but if we're being realistic, it's not crippling catsass' team to the point where he's set back by it. Most likely outcome is that it doesn't hurt his team at all.