WTF Stroman. It is getting hard to defend this turd.

[Dick_Pole]

It's the same as circumcision. I didn't circumcise my son, and I don't agree with what Stroman did, but he's not running a dog fighting ring. I think he just made a stupid choice.

 

f***, now I have to reconsider my life choices having agreed 100% with saskjayfan on this topic.

[saskjayfan]

f***, now I have to reconsider my life choices having agreed 100% with saskjayfan on this topic.

 

There's a lottery winner every week. It was bound to happen eventually.

[JaysAllMighty]

Guaranteed he did it to look more badass to get street cred, because that's what Mike Stud would have done.

It's hard to imagine him staying balanced when he pitches with the enormous chip he has on his shoulder.

 

Looking forward to running him out of Toronto.

 

He has the "Short man syndrome".

[Grant77]

He has the "Short man syndrome".

 

I don't know why that phrase ever became popular when Napoleon Complex describes the condition so much better. Either way, Stroman certainly has it.

[AintNoThang]

He has the "Short man syndrome".

 

Forget that he has short man syndrome, you dudes suffer from Stroman derangement syndrome!

[Jonn]

I don't know why that phrase ever became popular when Napoleon Complex describes the condition so much better. Either way, Stroman certainly has it.

 

Little Man Syndrome is better

[Krylian]

oh man can I just not muster the energy to get mad at dog ear pins or tail crops. I mean, I can understand people not liking it... I just can't manage to be angry over it.

 

If it was anyone else on the Jays I doubt anyone would raise that much of a fuss, but Stroman has already assembled quite a menu of DBag behaviour to refer to, so this is just another entree to add to that. His entire existence is built on, 'I'm a small man...but I can do whatever I want cause no one can tell me otherwise.' People with a brain in their head don't give a s*** about that. Be a decent human being, make smart choices, and be the best athlete you can be...that's all many of us want. He's incapable of doing that.

[candymartinez]

This thread is confusing, people seem to be against harming innocent animals since they object to what Stroman did, yet they are gushing over bacon pancakes (where you need to harm an animal similar to a dog to make it).

 

Just a little inconsistent.

[jays4life19]

This thread is confusing, people seem to be against harming innocent animals since they object to what Stroman did, yet they are gushing over bacon pancakes (where you need to harm an animal similar to a dog to make it).

 

Just a little inconsistent.

 

To be fair, i was the only one who gushed over bacon pancakes and never gave an opinion on the actual thread subject.

 

Bacon pancakes are highly recommended though

[Deadpool]

To be fair, i was the only one who gushed over bacon pancakes and never gave an opinion on the actual thread subject.

 

Bacon pancakes are highly recommended though

 

Damn right they are. Adventure Time made me make them a few years ago, I did not regret it at all.

[Abomination]

This thread is confusing, people seem to be against harming innocent animals since they object to what Stroman did, yet they are gushing over bacon pancakes (where you need to harm an animal similar to a dog to make it).

 

Just a little inconsistent.

 

There's a difference between an animal being killed for food, and harming one because you think it makes it look cool.

[candymartinez]

There's a difference between an animal being killed for food, and harming one because you think it makes it look cool.

 

Oh, so if Stroman cut that dog up to pieces, cooked him on a frying pan and ate its corpse, that would be better than what he did? Really?

[Spanky99]

Oh, so if Stroman cut that dog up to pieces, cooked him on a frying pan and ate its corpse, that would be better than what he did? Really?

 

WTF??? lol

[BTS]

Vegans really are the worst.

[candymartinez]

WTF??? lol

 

He implied harming an animal for food is ok, but to look cool is not. So if Stroman did it for food it would be ok.

 

That's where his logic leads. Understand now?

[KevinGregg]

He implied harming an animal for food is ok, but to look cool is not. So if Stroman did it for food it would be ok.

 

That's where his logic leads. Understand now?

 

No one suggested that anyone should eat a dog. Maybe your f***ed up logic leads there, but not anyone who posted here.

[Candy Maldonado]

Does dog taste good?

[Spanky99]

He implied harming an animal for food is ok, but to look cool is not. So if Stroman did it for food it would be ok.

 

That's where his logic leads. Understand now?

 

[candymartinez]

No one suggested that anyone should eat a dog. Maybe your f***ed up logic leads there, but not anyone who posted here.

 

Here's the quote for ya. Kinda hard to miss.

 

There's a difference between an animal being killed for food, and harming one because you think it makes it look cool.

 

 

My f***ed up logic? Haha. Please tell me how that statement taken in context doesn't lead you to believe his argument is "killing animals for food is fine, to look cool is not"

 

This should be good.

[bones10]

Oh, so if Stroman cut that dog up to pieces, cooked him on a frying pan and ate its corpse, that would be better than what he did? Really?

 

Tu quoque (/tjuːˈkwoʊkwi, tuːˈkwoʊkweɪ/;[1] Latin for "you also"), or the appeal to hypocrisy, is a fallacy that intends to discredit the opponent's argument by asserting the opponent's failure to act consistently in accordance with its conclusion(s).

[Deadpool]

 

Every single one of those people is the worst person.

[L54]

He implied harming an animal for food is ok, but to look cool is not. So if Stroman did it for food it would be ok.

 

That's where his logic leads. Understand now?

 

What kind of drugs do you do?

[BTS]

Has anyone else noticed that Spanky has been the forum's best poster in 2019?

[candymartinez]

What kind of drugs do you do?

 

If he's not implying that, then what do you think he's trying to get across with that statement?

[candymartinez]

Tu quoque (/tjuːˈkwoʊkwi, tuːˈkwoʊkweɪ/;[1] Latin for "you also"), or the appeal to hypocrisy, is a fallacy that intends to discredit the opponent's argument by asserting the opponent's failure to act consistently in accordance with its conclusion(s).

 

That doesn't apply here at all. I'm not saying their argument is wrong because they are a hypocrite. I haven't even taken a side on whether it's ok or not to alter the appearance of dogs. I'm simply saying it's inconsistent.

[P2F]

BTS...please?

[bones10]

That doesn't apply here at all. I'm not saying their argument is wrong because they are a hypocrite. I haven't even taken a side on whether it's ok or not to alter the appearance of dogs. I'm simply saying it's inconsistent.

 

And why are you pointing out this inconsistency cropping dog ears can be seen as bad independently of eating animals for food

[Spanky99]

Has anyone else noticed that Spanky has been the forum's best poster in 2019?

 

Awwwwwww...

[Jimcanuck]

Has anyone else noticed that Spanky has been the forum's best poster in 2019?

 

He's been more tolerable, but the GDT haven't really started yet. That's where he loses it.

[candymartinez]

And why are you pointing out this inconsistency cropping dog ears can be seen as bad independently of eating animals for food

 

It absolutely can be seen as bad independent of anything. You're right.

 

I never commented on whether that was ok or not. I just find it very odd people's inconsistency when it comes to which animals can be harmed and which can't. Sounds kinda dumb when people are crying about a dog's ear when they pay someone to slit a pig's throat