candymartinez

JS getting defensive.

Well, here we go again. Another coin flip game. 0 for 3 in these in the playoffs last year and now. Hopefully we catch the right breaks today...

As a longtime lurker and occasional poster. I gotta ask, why is this JuniorFelix account not banned yet? It's obviously a troll.

Tellez!!!

Look at that family. Lol

At least they made it entertaining after the dumpster fire that was the first few innings.

Nice gift there.

What a bomb

Eating up those innings!

Veggies aren't a macro. You're saying get 40% from protein and fat, then that means you're getting 60% from carbs. You say stay away from carbs yet recommending a mostly carb diet. It's hilarious seeing people constantly thinking "carbs" are some evil food. Big difference between sweet potatoes and quinoa, and Pop-tarts and donuts.

It absolutely can be seen as bad independent of anything. You're right. I never commented on whether that was ok or not. I just find it very odd people's inconsistency when it comes to which animals can be harmed and which can't. Sounds kinda dumb when people are crying about a dog's ear when they pay someone to slit a pig's throat

That doesn't apply here at all. I'm not saying their argument is wrong because they are a hypocrite. I haven't even taken a side on whether it's ok or not to alter the appearance of dogs. I'm simply saying it's inconsistent.

If he's not implying that, then what do you think he's trying to get across with that statement?

Here's the quote for ya. Kinda hard to miss. My f***ed up logic? Haha. Please tell me how that statement taken in context doesn't lead you to believe his argument is "killing animals for food is fine, to look cool is not" This should be good.

He implied harming an animal for food is ok, but to look cool is not. So if Stroman did it for food it would be ok. That's where his logic leads. Understand now?