Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
This will always be the case because there is very little threat from females. A man can just overpower them and defend themselves. Unless you are a "cuck beta". I'm the furthest thing from a SJW but there is some logic in pretending to be a woman for like 10 minutes and seeing how basically every man you walk past could kill you in 5 minutes if he wanted to.

 

Females objectifying males is inappropriate but carries basically zero risk for the man, so it's ignored. It shouldn't be ignored but ultimately who gives a f***, as a man. If a woman wants to act on their objectification - say they want to just take the man and put him in their basement, they physically can't. But if it's the other way around, the man could. This is literally what it comes down to.

 

As soon as they want equality then they should be held to the same standard. I'm sick of women starting s*** by spitting and hitting guys then act like they are untouchable because they gave a pussy.

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Females objectifying males is inappropriate but carries basically zero risk for the man, so it's ignored. It shouldn't be ignored but ultimately who gives a f***, as a man. If a woman wants to act on their objectification - say they want to just take the man and put him in their basement, they physically can't. But if it's the other way around, the man could. This is literally what it comes down to.

 

I get your point but I think that's a dangerous generalization. There is more than one way for people to hold power over others than just brute strength. Imagine if Hillary Clinton tried to proposition you? You'd be disgusted in every way possible and also terrified of the consequences if you did not comply.

Posted
People have been pushing for JP Arencibia as a replacement on Twitter.

 

Time to reunite the team of Arencibia and Lawrie. Capture those young female and douchebro audiences.

Posted
Time to reunite the team of Arencibia and Lawrie. Capture those young female and douchebro audiences.

 

Gotta get those gains bruh.

Posted

 

I doubt that Sporstnet really gave a s*** about Zaun's behaviour until other media personalities started getting heat for sexual misdeeds that, in most cases, were a lot worse than his. Which isn't to say that it's wrong to fire him for sexually harassing co-workers but they probably let their media personalities do and say whatever the f*** they wanted for years before finally only just realizimg that you could get in trouble for that kind of enabling. I doubt he'll be missed.

Posted
I doubt that Sporstnet really gave a s*** about Zaun's behaviour until other media personalities started getting heat for sexual misdeeds that, in most cases, were a lot worse than his. Which isn't to say that it's wrong to fire him for sexually harassing co-workers but they probably let their media personalities do and say whatever the f*** they wanted for years before finally only just realizimg that you could get in trouble for that kind of enabling. I doubt he'll be missed.

 

Wasn't he sending unrequested dick pics to Co workers? That's pretty bad if true.

Posted
Wasn't he sending unrequested dick pics to Co workers? That's pretty bad if true.

 

I didn't know that any specifics had come out. Yeah you don't need a seminar to tell that you're crossing a line with that s***. I'd be curious to know what Sportsnet might have let him get away with before it got to that point but that's more of a question for Sportsnet to consider with future employees than an excuse for Zaun being such a dickhead.

Posted
Wasn't he sending unrequested dick pics to Co workers? That's pretty bad if true.

 

Didn't they state somewhere that the behavior in question wasn't sexual in nature?

Posted
Didn't they state somewhere that the behavior in question wasn't sexual in nature?

 

I was going off Hurls quote

 

The young female Jays bloggers, vloggers, Twitter Followers and Matt Harvey coming out with stories of Zaun DM's and Dick Pics now.

 

 

I honestly don't care enough to actually try and find out the specifics of what he did aha

Community Moderator
Posted

"Zaun's on-air brand and image was based around aggressive masculinity so when he wore (undershirts) around the office and made rude sexual comments directly to women, or in close proximity of women, with the clear intention of making us uncomfortable, it was sort of implied: that's who he was, deal with it," said one employee, who did not want to be identified for fear of reprisals at work.

 

lmao, this douche nozzle was wearing undershirts around the office

Posted
"Zaun's on-air brand and image was based around aggressive masculinity so when he wore (undershirts) around the office and made rude sexual comments directly to women, or in close proximity of women, with the clear intention of making us uncomfortable, it was sort of implied: that's who he was, deal with it," said one employee, who did not want to be identified for fear of reprisals at work.

 

lmao, this douche nozzle was wearing undershirts around the office

 

My wife makes fun of me for wearing a muscle shirt around the house seems ridiculous to do it at work

Posted
That's why you got to triple check who you're sending snaps too. Very easy to hit the box beside their name.

 

Sounds like you might have sent a dick pic to the wrong person before. Lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...