Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 337
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Why does shatkins not take any flack for the Chavez/Hendricks trade. What a f***ing disaster.

 

Shatkins takes plenty of flack.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
They've been about the same.....

 

Considering one is making the minimum and the other 4M. Its not the same.

Posted
I just don't understand why we don't fix one aspect of the BP. Trade Storen for a bag of balls or designate him, and just call up Barnes.
Posted
Why does shatkins not take any flack for the Chavez/Hendricks trade. What a f***ing disaster.

 

*Hendriks*, hasn't been very good... RP's are volatile.

Posted
Considering one is making the minimum and the other 4M. Its not the same.

 

Considering that one can be used as a starter while the other isn't is not the same either.

Posted
I just don't understand why we don't fix one aspect of the BP. Trade Storen for a bag of balls or designate him, and just call up Barnes.

 

Than Storen pitches lights out, the rest of the way.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Considering that one can be used as a starter while the other isn't is not the same either.

 

Nobody wants to see Chavez used as a starter. I would have rather streched out Hendriks.

Posted
*Hendriks*, hasn't been very good... RP's are volatile.

 

There would still be more control, though. Neither could end up being worth it, but I was skeptical of the move then and I haven't changed my mind at all now. I'll admit that nobody foresaw Sanchez's breakout, so Chavez had a more versatile projected role back in November. I remember a lot of posters being very skeptical as well.

Posted
I just don't understand why we don't fix one aspect of the BP. Trade Storen for a bag of balls or designate him, and just call up Barnes.

 

I agree about Barnes, heck, I want to see Rowen too.

Posted
Than Storen pitches lights out, the rest of the way.

 

I wouldn't be surprised lol. Murphy's Law always seems to follow the Jays.

Posted
There would still be more control, though. Neither could end up being worth it, but I was skeptical of the move then and I haven't changed my mind at all now. I'll admit that nobody foresaw Sanchez's breakout, so Chavez had a more versatile projected role back in November. I remember a lot of posters being very skeptical as well.

 

Pretty much.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Suxxxxx as a starter.

 

They both suck for a variety of reasons. Its over and done with. Not really worth talking about. Hendriks had years of control and was cheaper. It was a bad trade.

Posted
I agree about Barnes, heck, I want to see Rowen too.

 

Barnes, Rowen, and Dermody should all get looks. It would be difficult for them to be worse than Storen/Chavez/etc

Posted
I wouldn't be surprised lol. Murphy's Law always seem to follow the Jays.

 

My girlfriend and I were at the great comeback vs. the Red Sox. Storen came in during the deficit and gave up a lead off double and her and I just made fun of his numbers for the next 10 minutes while he worked out of the jam. Turns out that run would have been the difference, so I guess we were the *******s?

 

That's about all I can say positive about Storen, unfortunately. His slider is dirty as hell when he's having a competent outing though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...