jays76 Verified Member Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 I wonder what the plan will be now at 1B if he doesn't make the cut considering Edwin's wonky back. Thoughts?
ScientificReason Verified Member Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 It's March 12th..relax. He may end up being garbage but it's spring, way too early to come to a conclusion.
BTS Community Moderator Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 I don't really think his results so far matter, but I've been wondering if there's a chance he gets cut if it keeps up.
jays76 Verified Member Posted March 12, 2015 Author Posted March 12, 2015 It's a hypothetical question, I wasn't looking for scientific reasoning.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 I wonder what the plan will be now at 1B if he doesn't make the cut considering Edwin's wonky back. Thoughts? So have Stanton and Melky. Those guys should totally get cut!
jays76 Verified Member Posted March 12, 2015 Author Posted March 12, 2015 I don't really think his results so far matter, but I've been wondering if there's a chance he gets cut if it keeps up. Yeah I mean if his current play is foreshadowing things to come you'd have to think AA has a contingency plan.
KingKat Old-Timey Member Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 I don't really think his results so far matter, but I've been wondering if there's a chance he gets cut if it keeps up. I think there's a chance. He always was a bit of a redemption project. The team would like to see a reason for optimism. Maybe you can still see it in his approach but it's really hard to divorce one's evalution of the approach from the results it yields. That's only human nature. Add the fact that from what I understand Barton's the better defensive option and you can see why Smoak wouldn't be a slam dunk.
SAAviour Verified Member Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 Anyone notice if the jays have changed his swing to see if adjustments can help him. Maybe he is trying something new? Or maybe he is hot garbage? Or maybe it's been like 10 spring training at bats?
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 Someone should really post the "small sample size" video, because y'know. Totes approps.
jays76 Verified Member Posted March 12, 2015 Author Posted March 12, 2015 So have Stanton and Melky. Those guys should totally get cut! ?? Smoak is being cut in this scenario.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 I don't really think his results so far matter, but I've been wondering if there's a chance he gets cut if it keeps up. I don't want a 1B who can't hit Everyone knows he underperformed offensively in Seattle (that seems to be a thing there...) but was there anything encouraging in his peripherals during his years there??
KingKat Old-Timey Member Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 Someone should really post the "small sample size" video, because y'know. Totes approps. Yeah that's fine but spring training itself is a small sample and teams DO make decisions based on what happens during spring training no matter how misguided that may seem. Mind you, Smoak's potentially just one really good game away from making this a non issue and I think we'd all be greatful to put this to rest but it's not out of line to speculate a bit about what impact a prolonged slump might have on roster decisions.
Governator Community Moderator Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 So have Stanton and Melky. Those guys should totally get cut! Because that's an equal comparison.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 ?? Smoak is being cut in this scenario. I think it was just a joke Stanton is hitting .167/.231/.250 in spring training so far, but obviously nobody cares.
KingKat Old-Timey Member Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 I don't want a 1B who can't hit Everyone knows he underperformed offensively in Seattle (that seems to be a thing there...) but was there anything encouraging in his peripherals during his years there?? IIRC, one of the main point of optimism was the the potential to convert a lot of fly balls into homeruns especially at Rogers Center.
Steveorama Verified Member Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 Guy has had 17 plate appearances so far. Assuming the Jays hitting coach has changed a few things in his swing, I would think he will get 40-50 PA's to work it out.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 Because that's an equal comparison. Well that's just it - Stanton has a track record that would allow him to suck for all of ST and no one will worry/care in the least. Smoak doesn't have the luxury of being able to have a horrendous batting month in ST and still be guaranteed the starting job at first base.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 IIRC, one of the main point of optimism was the the potential to convert a lot of fly balls into homeruns especially at Rogers Center. No doubt. Same with Donaldson. The AL West is bad that way. Playing a BUNCH of more games at Rogers Centre and Fenway and a lot fewer at Safeco and O.co will help anyone's HR numbers as long as they hit enough fly balls and line drives.
jays76 Verified Member Posted March 12, 2015 Author Posted March 12, 2015 I don't want a 1B who can't hit Everyone knows he underperformed offensively in Seattle (that seems to be a thing there...) but was there anything encouraging in his peripherals during his years there?? For sure but I mean can you really compare those two to Smoak. I know it's a sss and spring training, etc. but I'm honestly wondering what the contingency plan is. I was hoping to muse that over and also I'm bored as hell right now, I'm not gonna lie
KingKat Old-Timey Member Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 No doubt. Same with Donaldson. The AL West is bad that way. Playing a BUNCH of more games at Rogers Centre and Fenway and a lot fewer at Safeco and O.co will help anyone's HR numbers as long as they hit enough fly balls and line drives. He's a 42% FB hitter for his career. For comparison, Bautista and Encarnacion are both at 45%. Smoak is the right KIND of player for the Jays to target but of course fitting the profile doesn't guarantee anything.
NorthOf49 Old-Timey Member Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 I wasn't expecting much from him. He was a minor league signing for a reason. He got a $1MM Major League deal.
Governator Community Moderator Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 Well that's just it - Stanton has a track record that would allow him to suck for all of ST and no one will worry/care in the least. Smoak doesn't have the luxury of being able to have a horrendous batting month in ST and still be guaranteed the starting job at first base. Yep.. Blue Jays are holding try outs for several jobs and managers aren't watching the Bautistas, Reyes, Donaldsons, Martins, they are looking to fill their holes with the best talent they have available, period. They have to make an educated guess on who is going to give them a better chance of winning ball games beginning on game #1. If Smoak doesn't turn things around, they aren't going to count on him to make a sudden change against MLB level pitchers day in and out. They were ok putting Romero in the minors and paying him $7MM, they can afford to replace Smoak.
jays76 Verified Member Posted March 12, 2015 Author Posted March 12, 2015 Yep.. Blue Jays are holding try outs for several jobs and managers aren't watching the Bautistas, Reyes, Donaldsons, Martins, they are looking to fill their holes with the best talent they have available, period. They have to make an educated guess on who is going to give them a better chance of winning ball games beginning on game #1. If Smoak doesn't turn things around, they aren't going to count on him to make a sudden change against MLB level pitchers day in and out. That's it and if he keeps dragging for the first month and beyond (because he's got the 1M MLB contract for an extended view) how much leeway do you give him before it's a huge detriment? It's a legitimate question, if he can't get his s*** together and EE's back isn't up for fielding on the regular what is the foreseeable plan after that?
glory Old-Timey Member Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 Even the Jays are not stupid enough to tempt fate with Edwin's back by having him play 1B regularly. I think Smoak or Barton will have to make the team, especially with Navarro begging to get traded.
Governator Community Moderator Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 That's it and if he keeps dragging for the first month and beyond (because he's got the 1M MLB contract for an extended view) how much leeway do you give him before it's a huge detriment? It's a legitimate question, if he can't get his s*** together and EE's back isn't up for fielding on the regular what is the foreseeable plan after that? Barton could become a legitimate option if he simply outperforms Smoak IMO. He has hot seasons and cold but he puts up pretty good WAR in limited games and a few years ago had a 4.8 war season. He's a defensive upgrade and while he doesn't have the pop a least he comes with a career .350 OBP. He's a much better depth option than Dan Johnson.
KingKat Old-Timey Member Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 Barton could become a legitimate option if he simply outperforms Smoak IMO. He has hot seasons and cold but he puts up pretty good WAR in limited games and a few years ago had a 4.8 war season. He's a defensive upgrade and while he doesn't have the pop a least he comes with a career .350 OBP. He's a much better depth option than Dan Johnson. Yeah Barton beating out Smoak is hardly crazy. Certainly better than going with a pure project like Viciedo who could be a black hole on both sides of the ball. Barton at least has a floor, arguably the best of the three.
jays76 Verified Member Posted March 12, 2015 Author Posted March 12, 2015 Yeah guys Barton could definitely be interesting, he takes a lot of walks to get on base apparently. He's a lefty too so he could platoon well with Valencia but I'm not sure how well DV's fielding is at 1B.
Governator Community Moderator Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 Yeah guys Barton could definitely be interesting, he takes a lot of walks to get on base apparently. He's a lefty too so he could platoon well with Valencia but I'm not sure how well DV's fielding is at 1B. Valencia's value at smashing lefties is good enough to warrant a 1B platoon imo, if not at least regular play time in the line up somehow.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 They were ok putting Romero in the minors and paying him $7MM, they can afford to replace Smoak. They really had no other option with Ricky
Governator Community Moderator Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 They really had no other option with Ricky and they may end up with no other option on Smoak.
Arjun Nimmala Vancouver Canadians - A+ SS It's been slow going at the start of the season for Nimmala, but on Sunday, he was 3-for-5 with his 3rd home run and 3 RBI. Explore Arjun Nimmala News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now