Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Which wild card front office do you most believe in?  

97 members have voted

  1. 1. Which wild card front office do you most believe in?

    • Houston Astros (led by Jeff Luhnow)
      10
    • New York Yankees (led by Brian Cashman)
      4
    • Chicago Cubs (led by Theo & Jed)
      68
    • Pittsburgh Pirates (led by Neal Huntington)
      15


Recommended Posts

Posted
My concern was raised by somebody in the comments section - sure you're reducing the intensity of each start but you're dramatically reducing the time between games.

 

But such a hard limit on starters doesn't necessarily need to result in dropping two starters, right? And that's where the increased pitch counts for relievers comes in I suppose.

 

You can still have 5-6 starters, but you'd vastly reduce a pen, leaving an outstanding bench. It'll certainly be neat to see.

  • Replies 13.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
MLBPA would file a grievance against the team unfortunately. The Rays have already been warned of this.

 

I've already mentioned this, you're late Hurl. :P

Posted
MLBPA would file a grievance against the team unfortunately. The Rays have already been warned of this.

 

It seems sort of strange - I mean if the argument for it is that pitchers will perform better and be injured less frequently then the pitchers will probably come to appreciate that. And if the roster size per team isn't' changing there's no loss of employment, right? However, I suppose it's players in an "iconic" (or something) position that are being replaced?

 

I dunno. Got any links to this grievance stuff? (I'll look backwards in the thread to see what's been linked, just heading to bed now though).

Posted
It seems sort of strange - I mean if the argument for it is that pitchers will perform better and be injured less frequently then the pitchers will probably come to appreciate that. And if the roster size per team isn't' changing there's no loss of employment, right? However, I suppose it's players in an "iconic" (or something) position that are being replaced?

 

I dunno. Got any links to this grievance stuff? (I'll look backwards in the thread to see what's been linked, just heading to bed now though).

 

This was first hand information from someone in the Rays organization. Creating starters out of guys that wouldn't normally start is a positive for those guys, but there are guys that get paid to eat innings (and those guys have traditionally been paid more than the 130 inning guys, despite lower numbers). Also there is no traditions in arbitration to judge these guys, so it makes it tough. In the end MLBPA doesn't like change (nor does baseball in general), but I wouldn't think they would go public with anything until they felt it was necessary.

Tampa was forced into a hybrid of what they would really like to do, but they also had so many injuries that it made it happen with too much notice. I was in Tampa for a game just after Erasmo was pulled in a 1 hitter and the person I know there was telling me that they scoured every media source to see what the reaction was.

Posted
Since we're talking about this kind of thing right now, has this been linked recently?

 

http://www.billjamesonline.com/the_three_man_starting_rotation/

 

Edit: Article is by Bill James outlining how a 3 man rotation would work - with a 5 inning or 80 pitch limit.

 

At the very least, it would be fun to try in an MLB The Show Franchise. I'm definitely doing this over the holidays when I get some time lol.

Posted
Phillies sign JPA to a minor-league deal--and considering Philly's a rebuilding team, he has a decent shot of making that team and striking out 200+ times and playing bad defense:

 

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2015/12/phillies-sign-j-p-arencibia.html

 

They also penned Greg Infante. That's a great signing for a rebuilding team. Guy would be sick if he ever managed to cut down the walks for any length of time. Throws as hard as anyone.

Posted

Buster Olney ‏@Buster_ESPN 3m3 minutes ago

Sources: Johnny Cueto has an agreement with the Giants, pending a physical.

354 retweets 128 likes

Reply Retweet 354

Like 128

More

Posted
I don't know why I keep subjecting myself to Sid Seixeiro's opinions on baseball. This needs to stop.

 

He's the worst.

Posted
Buster Olney ‏@Buster_ESPN 3m3 minutes ago

Sources: Johnny Cueto has an agreement with the Giants, pending a physical.

354 retweets 128 likes

Reply Retweet 354

Like 128

More

 

lol Dodgers got f***ed by everyone

Posted
They got Iwakuma.

 

Not bad but they lost Greinke, supposedly got Chapman but got cockblocked at the last second, and were supposedly suitors for Price and didn't end up getting him.

Posted
Doesn't CA have a much higher tax rate than Arizona? I think Cueto is actually making less with the Giants than if he would have signed in Arizona.
Posted
Doesn't CA have a much higher tax rate than Arizona? I think Cueto is actually making less with the Giants than if he would have signed in Arizona.

 

CA income tax is more than 2.5x Arizona at high incomes

Posted

Heyward's contract details came out. Understand why he took less total money now as it looks like a great contract for the player. Also came with a 20 Million signing bonus.

 

Posted
Heyward's contract details came out. Understand why he took less total money now as it looks like a great contract for the player. Also came with a 20 Million signing bonus.

 

 

Props to Heyward's agent, that's a fine deal for him.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...