Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Community Moderator
Posted
Looks like Abom and I will finish tied, and we didn't matchup in the regular season. What happens now?

 

Rule 69.420 says you're both done and the #1 seed from the regular season gets to move on

Posted
Looks like Abom and I will finish tied, and we didn't matchup in the regular season. What happens now?

 

First tie-breaker is highest seed advances.

Posted
That's the first tie breaker? Pretty bush league but sure

 

Yeah, those two playoff tiebreaker rules should be reversed. It wouldn't have mattered though, because we didn't meet in the regular season with the shortened year anyhow. It was a good match. I've had a couple years where I've been on the other side of it.

Posted
That's the first tie breaker? Pretty bush league but sure

 

Yeah, that should definitely be the other way around. At least it didn't affect you guys.

Community Moderator
Posted
I’ve actually always thought regular season record was the better tiebreaker than H2H. I know Yahoo made it convention to have H2H as the first tie-break, but I like that regular season record rewards season-long success.
Posted
I’ve actually always thought regular season record was the better tiebreaker than H2H. I know Yahoo made it convention to have H2H as the first tie-break, but I like that regular season record rewards season-long success.

 

Yeah, but it uses the higher seed, not the better record (I think). They aren't necessarily the same.

Posted
I’ve actually always thought regular season record was the better tiebreaker than H2H. I know Yahoo made it convention to have H2H as the first tie-break, but I like that regular season record rewards season-long success.

 

This is my thinking. 1st overall team that dominated all season is away on vacation over the winter for a week and loses to the eventual 8th overall team that just squeaks into the playoffs thanks to some streaming that week. They tie in the 1st round. No way the 8th should advance and the 1st is booted, because of that one unfortunate week in December.

Posted
Yeah, but it uses the higher seed, not the better record (I think). They aren't necessarily the same.

 

Seeding is based on record I believe.

 

Edit: Except for the division winner gets a top seed. We have 2 divisions, so one would be 1st the other 2nd.

Old-Timey Member
Posted (edited)
Jeez, is it hot in here or just me? Looks like we have quite the matchup for the finals. Hits and goals are likely already Abom's somehow - 9 goals and 47 hits through Tuesday. Edited by P2F
Posted
Jeez, is it hot in here or just me? Looks like we have quite the matchup for the finals. Hits and goals are likely already Abom's somehow - 9 goals and 47 hits through Tuesday.

 

That's the way a finals should be!

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Not sure? Since it’s a 2 week period.

 

If not, can we please double it? It only makes sense.

Posted
Can anyone confirm if we get a fresh round of adds next week?

 

I don't THINK we do, but I'm not positive.

 

Also, ouch! This was not the day to forget about an early game and sit Krejci :(

Posted (edited)
If not, can we please double it? It only makes sense.

 

If it doesn't reset on Monday, I'll add them. Well, that's if Abom agrees of course.

Edited by Spanky99
Posted
I don't THINK we do, but I'm not positive.

 

Also, ouch! This was not the day to forget about an early game and sit Krejci :(

 

Ouch 3 assists, plus... that could end up hurting. Are you fine with me adding 5 additional moves? They're at 1 so 6 remaining, and you have 3 so 8 remaining.

Posted
Ouch 3 assists, plus... that could end up hurting. Are you fine with me adding 5 additional moves? They're at 1 so 6 remaining, and you have 3 so 8 remaining.

 

I'm fine with it either way for this year since there was confusion (I wasn't sure either, so was holding onto a few), but how it's handled going forward should be decided on after the season and put in the rules.

Posted
I'm fine with it either way for this year since there was confusion (I wasn't sure either, so was holding onto a few), but how it's handled going forward should be decided on after the season and put in the rules.

 

Agreed. Good Luck guys... I feel it's going to come down to your guys goaltending, both looking sharp.

Posted (edited)
Okay, TG1C set at 6 claims, Abom 8, the league did reset the claims, so we need not worry about that stuff. Edited by Spanky99
Old-Timey Member
Posted
Analysis

Jarry replaced the injured DeSmith at the start of the third period with the Flyers trailing 4-2 and gave up a pair of power-play goals by Sidney Crosby and Jason Zucker in the first 8:24 of the frame. Jarry was already the likely starter for Tuesday's rematch with the Flyers, and Jarry's injury all but assures it.

 

wut?

Old-Timey Member
Posted
lol

 

Lol that entire blurb is wrong! There are like 4 errors in there. The only thing that's accurate is that Jarry replaced DeSmith! That's f***ing brutal.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...