eastcoastjaysfan Old-Timey Member Posted July 7, 2013 Posted July 7, 2013 I don't see any harm in letting McGowan go 50 pitches in his next outing.. gradually increasing the workload. Perez is the perfect piggy back candidate.
eastcoastjaysfan Old-Timey Member Posted July 7, 2013 Posted July 7, 2013 IGNORE THE EVIDENCe! Don't let that get in the way of your opinion! It's going to happen eventually... but the Reds are currently a first place team with a great staff. Maybe they don't feel like experimenting with him as a starter right now. Or maybe you're right and they're all f***ing stupid. They have a few holes at 3B and LF. One of those current arms would probably fetch a decent return for them down the stretch if they were to convert Chapman.
BabbaGanoush Verified Member Posted July 7, 2013 Posted July 7, 2013 You guys are forgetting one of the most important things, Chapman himself said that he wants to be a closer.
eastcoastjaysfan Old-Timey Member Posted July 7, 2013 Posted July 7, 2013 You guys are forgetting one of the most important things, Chapman himself said that he wants to be a closer. Does he realize that relievers get paid A LOT less than starters? He'd be lucky to max out at 100M as a reliever (very lucky). He's essentially throwing away 50-75M if he thinks like this.
ElNik2013 Old-Timey Member Posted July 7, 2013 Posted July 7, 2013 Does he realize that relievers get paid A LOT less than starters? He'd be lucky to max out at 100M as a reliever (very lucky). He's essentially throwing away 50-75M if he thinks like this. I think what he said was that next spring he'd like to go back to starting.
The Cats Ass Old-Timey Member Posted July 8, 2013 Posted July 8, 2013 If you guys wanna believe that Chapmans a reliever because the Reds FO is stupid and there manager is senile,go right ahead. I'll stick with the limited repertoire theory. Your theory is wrong though. Chapman is the only thing holding Chapman back. He's the closer because he wants to be.
The Cats Ass Old-Timey Member Posted July 8, 2013 Posted July 8, 2013 Does he realize that relievers get paid A LOT less than starters? He'd be lucky to max out at 100M as a reliever (very lucky). He's essentially throwing away 50-75M if he thinks like this. I think he knows this. I think he wanted to be a reliever this year earlier in his career to save on his arm. To baby it alittle instead of going out and throwing 200 innings his first couple years. He'll start though in his years heading up to free agency. This way there's a better chance that he'll be healthy the last couple years just before he hits free agency. So next year he'll go as a starter, hit a couple bumps in the road but still be a good starter. Then the next 2 years after that he'll pitch like an ace. Then he signs his huge 9 figure contract. Then his arm explodes from too many 100mph fastballs. Him and his agent have it all planned out.
Jays Verified Member Posted July 8, 2013 Posted July 8, 2013 IP are good, but saves are better Very good, DustyBaker. Very good.
Angrioter Old-Timey Member Posted July 8, 2013 Posted July 8, 2013 IP are good, but saves are better Reported Saves and Hlds = s***
DustyBaker Verified Member Posted July 8, 2013 Posted July 8, 2013 Reported Saves and Hlds = s*** I don't understand. I like IP, I have many friends who can vouche for this
JoJo Parker Dunedin Blue Jays - A SS On Tuesday, Parker was just 1-for-5, but the one hit was his first professional home run. Explore JoJo Parker News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now