Caper Verified Member Posted May 17, 2013 Posted May 17, 2013 My question is. #1 prospect Jim Negrych is not on the 40 man roster. Does this mean he can be taken in the rule 5 draft?
John_Havok Old-Timey Member Posted May 17, 2013 Posted May 17, 2013 My question is. #1 prospect Jim Negrych is not on the 40 man roster. Does this mean he can be taken in the rule 5 draft? Come on dude. Give up the trolling and stick to legit conversation
Caper Verified Member Posted May 17, 2013 Posted May 17, 2013 Come on dude. Give up the trolling and stick to legit conversation That wasn't really trolling... Except he #1 prospect part.... I actually thought the rule 5 draft was a little but closer, then December.
Caper Verified Member Posted May 17, 2013 Posted May 17, 2013 Also, I reject that the notion that a player like Negrych cannot have value because he is in his late 20s. Bautista was almost NOTHING until his late 20s.
GD Old-Timey Member Posted May 17, 2013 Posted May 17, 2013 Also, I reject that the notion that a player like Negrych cannot have value because he is in his late 20s. Bautista was almost NOTHING until his late 20s. But Bautista didn't have a BABIP over .400 and not every f***ing player who gets lucky and is over 28 is Jose f***ing Bautista, holy s***.
Caper Verified Member Posted May 17, 2013 Posted May 17, 2013 But Bautista didn't have a BABIP over .400 and not every f***ing player who gets lucky and is over 28 is Jose f***ing Bautista, holy s***. Really? Is that what I said? Every player that gets lucky and is over 28 is Jose Bautista.... I think you just made that up.
GD Old-Timey Member Posted May 17, 2013 Posted May 17, 2013 Really? Is that what I said? Every player that gets lucky and is over 28 is Jose Bautista.... I think you just made that up. You brought up that players in their late 20's can break out and have value. Why do you think Negrych will have value, pray tell?
GD Old-Timey Member Posted May 17, 2013 Posted May 17, 2013 To play Devil's Advocate, Justin Ruggiano maintained a .401 BABIP for 91 games last year. I guess it's possible Negrych rides some luck. He probably won't, though. I really like the guy as he was one of those guys no one really knows about who ends up succeeding (I randomly stumbled upon his name and liked what I saw) but I just don't think he'll play well.
KSaw Verified Member Posted May 17, 2013 Author Posted May 17, 2013 Bautista was in the Majors at 23, Negrych is 28 and has never appeared in the Majors. Bautista has a Major League tool (plus power), Negrych does not. He's an org player. Org players do break out of the pack at times. Comparing Negrych and Bautista is silly but comparing him to Craig Counsell seems to be popular of late.
Caper Verified Member Posted May 17, 2013 Posted May 17, 2013 Org players do break out of the pack at times. Comparing Negrych and Bautista is silly but comparing him to Craig Counsell seems to be popular of late. Who compared him to Bautista? I used Bautista as an example of someone who showed almost nothing early in his career that came along in his late 20's.
Caper Verified Member Posted May 17, 2013 Posted May 17, 2013 To play Devil's Advocate, Justin Ruggiano maintained a .401 BABIP for 91 games last year. I guess it's possible Negrych rides some luck. He probably won't, though. I really like the guy as he was one of those guys no one really knows about who ends up succeeding (I randomly stumbled upon his name and liked what I saw) but I just don't think he'll play well. Maybe he won't..... but I will tell you who will not play well......Maicer Izturis. It's not like Roberto Alomar is in a slump and I want him replaced.
blackjays21 Verified Member Posted May 17, 2013 Posted May 17, 2013 Maybe he won't..... but I will tell you who will not play well......Maicer Izturis. It's not like Roberto Alomar is in a slump and I want him replaced. LOL... yea Maicer doesn't seem like hes gonna be a important part of this team.. terrible terrible signing by A.A.
KSaw Verified Member Posted May 19, 2013 Author Posted May 19, 2013 I'm willing to give Negrych a shot, see if he can maintain an OBP above .330. But it has to be done with zero expectations and Izturis/Boni would need to keep playing poorly for a few weeks. After a couple quiet games with the bat, Negrych went 3-5 today. Average is at .398. If anyone is wondering why I still think he should be up, I'll put it in perspective this way-- I'd rather Velez up over Bonifacio. Izturis can play shortstop and second. Bonifacio really shouldn't ever be in the infield. Now fair enough that he runs like the wind and he has had his bat wake a tiny bit but he's really not an on base guy and his glove is awful. Negrych should be up. If he hit .200 he'd be better than what's here. He's a better fielder. And I don't want to hear this giving up on Bonifacio junk. He's bad at baseball and has a horrible baseball IQ! He just hurts the team.
o2cui2i Community Moderator Posted May 19, 2013 Posted May 19, 2013 You brought up that players in their late 20's can break out and have value. Why do you think Negrych will have value, pray tell? Negrych will have a lesser negative value than whoever he replaces, but lesser negative is not necessarily a positive. lol
Arjun Nimmala Vancouver Canadians - A+ SS It's been slow going at the start of the season for Nimmala, but on Sunday, he was 3-for-5 with his 3rd home run and 3 RBI. Explore Arjun Nimmala News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now