Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Anybody interested in MiLB 59 + waiver pick 99 for an upcoming pick?

 

I'd give you 93 but I feel like someone higher than me should be all over this.

Posted
I'd give you 93 but I feel like someone higher than me should be all over this.

 

I offered speedy the same deal but if he doesn't take it, you're on.

Posted
Interested to see who Dinger picks here. He could use another SS eligible player or a SP but I suspect if he's moving up it's to snatch a reliever.
Posted
Interested to see who Dinger picks here. He could use another SS eligible player or a SP but I suspect if he's moving up it's to snatch a reliever.

 

You're right that I could use some SS depth but I'm not going that direction. I just want to confirm that I'm OTC before I blurt my pick out.

Posted (edited)
Wonderful deal for Speedy.

 

Agreed, it seems like a ludicrous overpay on its face.

 

But late last night I realized that Willson Contreras is eligible, so that's who I'm taking. If I had realized it sooner, I probably would have taken him in the 1st round.

Edited by Dr. Dinger
Posted
Agreed, it seems like a ludicrous overpay on it's face.

 

But late last night I realized that Willson Contreras is eligible, so that's who I'm taking. If I had realized it sooner, I probably would have taken him in the 1st round.

 

Interesting. I knew he was available the whole time. I guess I shrugged him off too easily.

Posted
Agreed, it seems like a ludicrous overpay on it's face.

 

But late last night I realized that Willson Contreras is eligible, so that's who I'm taking. If I had realized it sooner, I probably would have taken him in the 1st round.

 

I had him flagged for my last pick. Didn't figure he'd play much this year. And he probably wouldn't be a keeper.

Posted
Interesting. I knew he was available the whole time. I guess I shrugged him off too easily.

 

I think he landed at 50 for MLB and 57 for BP, or vice versa. He'll probably be in AAA all year, but he could be a big trade chip to them which could open up a path to playing time. I figure, as a prospect, he's better than what I could get with that MiLB pick. The only problem will be making room for him on my 20 next year if he doesn't debut, but I figure he'll make that decision for me.

Posted
I had him flagged for my last pick. Didn't figure he'd play much this year. And he probably wouldn't be a keeper.

 

All it really takes is Montero getting hurt or sucking, the Cubs are apparently very very high on Contreras.

Posted
I had him flagged for my last pick. Didn't figure he'd play much this year. And he probably wouldn't be a keeper.

 

Yeah I figure he was a complete non factor this year and just moved on but he has more prospect hype than I realized. I should have investigated more closely.

Posted
I had him flagged for my last pick. Didn't figure he'd play much this year. And he probably wouldn't be a keeper.

 

I don't expect him to play at all this year but I have nobody ticketed for my NA slots, so I'll just stash him there and monitor his progress. If he reverts to mediocrity this year he's an easy cut with no big loss.

Posted
All it really takes is Montero getting hurt or sucking, the Cubs are apparently very very high on Contreras.

 

I thought he was more of a defensive catcher than a hitting catcher. Similar to Hedges.

Posted
I thought he was more of a defensive catcher than a hitting catcher. Similar to Hedges.

 

Not at all, if anything he's the opposite. He's a former infielder who's really just coming into his own as a catcher, defensively, but he showed a marked improvement in his approach this year and won the batting title in his league while posting a sick K/BB.

Posted
All it really takes is Montero getting hurt or sucking, the Cubs are apparently very very high on Contreras.

 

Yeah I wish I had know this. He just came to my attention through my spreadsheet and I looked into him briefly, figured he wouldn't make an offensive impact this year and moved on. He was on my watch list but since I don't follow scouting reports at all, I didn't prioritize him. Damn, this isn't the first time you've scooped me on players that make more sense for my team.

Posted
f***. Very shrewd, Dinger. It's weird that he's in the database.

 

They announced with great fanfare that they would have more player in the database this year but instead if just feels more arbitrary than usual. There are several players with a pretty clear path that are missing and many without any real chance that are there.

Posted
f***. Very shrewd, Dinger. It's weird that he's in the database.

 

There aren't many prospects that are even eligible to get taken in our Waiver Draft, they really have to be pop-up guys who make AA but emerged too late in the year to get taken in the prospect draft.

Posted
This is frustrating. I did a lot of work cross-checking the top minor leaguers with the Yahoo! database and our ownership spreadsheet and then didn't do enough with that information. I'm like the GM who doesn't listen to his analytic team except that were the same person.
Posted
There aren't many prospects that are even eligible to get taken in our Waiver Draft, they really have to be pop-up guys who make AA but emerged too late in the year to get taken in the prospect draft.

 

Am I wrong that Knapp fits that description to a T? He's not there.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...