Charlie is much like Cito Gaston in that he deservedly takes a lot of heat for his in game managerial decisions, but for both Charlie and Cito it's purported that their influence outside of game time are their most positive attributes. Charlie may be clueless when it comes to proper in game strategy, and he also has a propensity to bring in the wrong relievers based on game scores and situation while also falling in love with mediocre veterans, but he has managed to keep this team positive despite any adversity that comes their way. There has been minimal complaining from the player base about the s***** situation they found themselves in to start the year playing out of minor league stadiums in Dunedin and Buffalo, and I think Charlie should receive a lot of credit for that. The club has also displayed a lot of resilience in being able to bounce back from tough losses which happened all too frequently throughout the season.
Ultimately I would still let him go as he has likely cost his club a chance at many victories that didn't ultimately come to fruition as he on many occasions failed to put his players in a proper position to succeed. I think he has served his purpose in guiding the club through the worst of the pandemic and allowed the team to keep a positive mindset despite whatever came their way, but a club with aspirations of competing can't afford to have their manager repeatedly making poor decisions over and over again.