My "how did Fangraphs do?" query was somewhat rhetorical ... because ... well ... I ain't that impressed.
I'm no stranger to Fangraphs etc. (and love the baseball nerd sites) but their projections aren't gospel for me (sorry.)
All i'm saying is that I (personally) wouldn't automatically dismiss somebody's "predictions" just because they don't emanate from some sophisticated "projections" system.
In fact, I think that IF
you take a keen bright baseball observer who follows a particular team religiously (watching the games and soaking up tons of relevant info & insights) so that he's very familiar with the players that he's forecasting, and he pays close attention to the stats along with considering a number of other factors about each player, such as:
- age?
- health?
- where the player is in his career? (prime? twilight?) ... maybe it's a contract year?
- what the player's likely role, and playing time, will be this season?
- has anything unique to a player recently arisen? (e.g. a big new adjustment with hitting approach or perhaps the development of a successful new pitch)
THEN
it wouldn't surprise me if knowledgeable Joe or Jane Jays fan can make "arbitrary predictions" about Blue Jays performances that frequently are as accurate (or as inaccurate haha) as the "projections" generated by Fangraphs, ZiPs, PECOTA, CAIRO and Bill James etc.
... (s***, I was buying Bill James' annual Baseball Abstract before many here were even a twinkle in their father's eye, and so I don't have any bias against sabermetrics and baseball analytics.)