The rule should be common sense to safety and to not take away from the game. If there is obvious intent to injure a player the play should be dead and this rule should be in effect, case in point the Utley incident. It's like hitting in hockey vs a hit from behind. I understand the rule that is in place and the fact that Bautista did violate the interference rule how it's written but I think it needs modifying, I hate that it's not part of the game.
While I never moved on to a competitive career, I played ball from age 5-23 (hard ball from mosquito through men's league) and was the shortstop for the last 8 years or so until I broke my arm sliding in to home. I never complained from the cut on my ankle in a tournament, or the bruise shins that happened though it'd be nice if it was taken out. All I cared about was the runner got the f*** down so I didn't take your head off because I was taught to aim at your head. Sure don't cut me up, that'd be great but I can respect your attempt at saving a runner, that's part of the spirit of the game and something that makes the game all the more interesting.
If you think what Bautista did was 100% wrong, not in respect to the rules but that type of play has no place in this game then you likely never played ball above 3-pitch or was the RF late inning sub, no disrespect.