Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

glory

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    14,868
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by glory

  1. Darn, I thought Petit was a realistic possibility. Oh well. I have a feeling Blanton will get a deal that's too rich for Shapiro's tastes as well given what other relievers have been getting, but then again that might just be Billy Beane trolling everyone, and not a sign of the market.
  2. The craziness of this off season has kind of made me glad the Jays are taking the boring route, even though I still foolishly refresh Twitter hoping for any Jays news whenever I can.
  3. Niese will be good in Pittsburgh.
  4. Confirmed by Heyman. john axford is $10M of course with a's. may bad (typing deficiency). 2 yrs. @Joelsherman1 had it right Beane has lost his ever loving mind.
  5. Joel Sherman: Axford gets 2 yrs at $10M with chance to earn $4M in game finished bonuses from #Athletics @susanslusser had signing 1st. Damn, looks like it will take at least 2/10 to get Blanton.
  6. Wasn't Stewart the runner up for the Jays GM job before JP got it? Dodging a bullet would be an understatement.
  7. Revere for Rubby and Delgado. I'm down.
  8. There has to be a way to pry a decent arm out of Arizona for very little (Anderson, DLR, Delgado, etc). Do they need a left fielder? Dat batting average and speed on Revere might be useful for them.
  9. Blanton + Petit would be great signs if they can get them at a reasonable price.
  10. Trade them Aaron Sanchez. Lord knows what the Jays could get back. He throws hard. And stuff.
  11. Wow there has to be a trade the Jays can make with Dave Stewart.
  12. Yeah I wouldn't be upset at all at something like 4/56 for Bautista and Encarnacion. I expect them to want more than that, and probably get it, but if that's the bar for mid-30's players looking for their last big payday, then that's a good thing.
  13. Man this thread is reminding me how glad I am that AA is gone. Good riddance.
  14. If Hutch beats him out or they acquire another SP, then sure I can see him as the long man, but I said they didn't acquire him to be the long man. They obviously like him as a SP but can use him in the pen as depth (which they are trying to accumulate) if need be. If they wanted a long man I don't think they move Hendriks for one. They clearly like him as a starter, and he is a good/solid starter.
  15. I don't think they view Chavez as a 6th man. They might be saying that in case they stumble on to another SP and need to move someone to the pen, but I don't believe that's how they view him if they moved Hendriks for him. They'll probably end up with someone like Petit to fill that role while Chavez is in the rotation.
  16. Is there any upside in this for the Jays when it comes to Bautista and Encarnacion? If they sign one or both, then they will be paying them free agent money in their mid to late-30's while their defensive value ceases to exist (if it hasn't already). Any time you pay someone big money for what they did in the past, rather than what can be reasonably projected in the future, it becomes a huge risk. If they lose both, then that's about a 9-10 WAR for $24m that they will no longer have. The surplus value is gone and it will surely take way more than $24m to find replacements anywhere near as good as them. Can't trade them due to 10/5 rights and they have no incentive to accept trades elsewhere when they know they play in a park suited for their strengths. So it's either lose both and be stuck having to replace them, or keep one/both and pay two DH's $20m a year during what could be their twilight years. Not an enviable spot to be in.
  17. Gibbons, the moron that he is, tends to say and do stupid things.
  18. The annual "quote a s***** no name Twitter source" rumor. If the Jays are being brought up, it's pure Boras. This would be the least Shapiro thing possible.
  19. I wouldn't rule out Shapiro signing one of them if the deal makes sense for the team. It's just unlikely. This is a heart vs brain situation. The heart wants to see them retire as Jays and win at least one championship in Toronto, while the brain is pointing out that paying free agent money for a player's twilight is doomed to fail.
  20. Dombrowski is probably going to sign both.
  21. Is someone out to sabotage the new regime in the eyes of the public? There is just so much negative press purposely designed to rile up a fanbase.
  22. Yep I was on the Kuma bandwagon, but I never expected him to want to come to Toronto.
  23. Osuna, Sanchez, and Hutchison starting in AAA would be fine with me but that's a lot of bullpen spots to fill without Hendriks.
  24. This org is in good hands with Atkins and Shapiro.
  25. That rotation with additional depth can compete in 2016. Next season without Bats and Edwin might be a different story.
×
×
  • Create New...