There are pluses and minuses to the way Atkins acted. JD apparently talked s*** to Beane in Oakland, and Beane wasn't having any of it, so they shipped him out immediately. It only took them three years to bounce back so no long term harm done, but that was a bad trade. On the flip side, Atkins took all of Stro's s***, probably in part to preserve trade value, and then moved him when an opportunity presented itself. If he had traded him the minute that "get out of this office, I'm only talking to Gibby and Walker" meeting happened, then he may have also made a reactionary deal out of anger. Would it have been better, worse, who knows?
Regardless, there is a clear lack of respect towards Atkins by players. The players should not feel comfortable publicly bashing a front office. Either hire someone who can communicate to players as an AGM, or grow a backbone.
Whether any of this changes my thoughts on the trade return, I'm honestly not sure. I wouldn't be surprised if Stro's value wasn't as high as we thought because of his low K/GB tendencies. On the flip side, I find it hard to believe no one else would top this offer, or the Mets couldn't have added something to the deal. It's entirely possible that Atkins identified SWR as the guy he wanted more than any other offer he was getting, and just did the best he could with that.