Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

John_Havok

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    21,112
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    18

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by John_Havok

  1. Technically, he ranked Groshans and Jimenez in the same tier, so they are pretty interchangeable. In the article he even states that if a player is in the same tier, the order isn't all that relevant. How is that you think he ranked Moreno, Orelvis, Hoglund and Groshans in the same tier when he very clearly didn't?
  2. Yeha, that just comes down to what list is what though. Some lists out there do nothing but prioritize ceiling, the fangraphs one is trying to predict actual major league contributions. They even acknowledge that some of the guys ranked lower have higher ceilings, but have virtually no data to go on, OR they took a step backwards, like Van Eyk. Looking at last years guys they had ranked ahead of Jimenez, who didn't get traded or graduate off the list... youve got Moreno, Hiraldo, Groshans, Van Eyk, De Castro, Kloffenstein, Smith, Machado, Pardinho and Joey Murray. Moreno aside, which guys on that list actually had a good year? I think it's obvious Beltre has a higher ceiling also, but given that he hasn't even played a game in the minors yet... its reasonable to rank Jiminez higher.
  3. Cant notice 1. You can notice a dozen of them.
  4. It’s not really them saying Jimenez is amazing or anything, just that the jays system is full of so many question marks, that his fairly high floor is easier to predict. Quite frankly, beyond Moreno and Orelvis, the system has a whole shitload of “who the f*** knows?” The Jays either graduated or traded 6 of their top 12 prospects from fangraphs list last year. That’s also a factor
  5. I'm fine with that TBH, but it also likely means sponsorships on jerseys(gag), even more digital ads on the field when the game is viewed via streams, and anything else they can come up with. Get ready to be bludgeoned even more mercilessly by ads in every way, shape and form they can conceive.
  6. TV revenue is one of the biggest revenue streams that gets shared through revenue sharing, so anything the Dodgers and the biggest markets would pull in this year would still be shared as normal to the clubs with lesser TV deals. Shouldn't be a problem. However, teams should be quite worried down the road that TV deals are going to be drying up to a point. People are simply cutting the cord on cable TV and choosing streaming options far more often these days. The multi-billion dollar local TV deals are likely a thing of the past.
  7. Meh, one outlet reporting another outlets pure guesses on what might happen. Nothing new.
  8. True, except you don't get invited to minor league spring training when you are signed to a minor league contract. It's your job to show up
  9. The only factual error here is that there can be no invites to spring training right now, simply because there is no spring training without a CBA. They cannot invite anyone to spring training until there's a CBA in place. Nitpicky, I know, and I'm sure they've agreed in principle that he will be invited to spring training when there is one... but details are important.
  10. Alpha Beta. The Lambda Lambda Lambdas will be his downfall.
  11. Pretty much. If you're willing to give them a contract to play, then you cant turn around later and say "no we dont think you should be in the Hall Of Fame because you're an *******." I feel the same way about PEDs. Unless you get banned from baseball based on multiple offenses which is in the current agreement, if you played well enough to get in, you get in, juiced or not. Basically, anything up to the point of being banned from baseball should not exclude you from the Hall.
  12. Nicky Lopez at 21 in Rookie ball - 62 games, 2 HR, 12.4% Walk rate, 10.6% K rate, wRC+ 132 triple slash .281/.393/.429 - 21 extra base hits Leo Jimenez at 21 in A ball - 59 games, 1 HR, 21.1% walk rate, 14.5% K rate, wRC+ 168 triple slash .315/.517/.381 - 9 extra base hits Jimenez is Nicky Lopez lite. Before now I couldn't even fathom Nicky Lopez having a "lite" version of himself. For Jimenez to mirror Lopez's path, next season he would need to start at A+ ball and hit his way to a wRC+ of 125 at that level, get promoted to AA halfway through and then hit like a limp noodle for the rest of the season.
  13. Sweet! the next Tony Gwynn
  14. The player's union doesn't represent minor league players though, only players on the 40 man roster. MILB needs their own union.
  15. Meh, his contract was up, he was not offered to be re-signed. So what? They have no responsibility to keep him employed. The reason is pretty s*****, but still
  16. Its possible. As I understand it, right now he's on paid administrative leave and has been since he last pitched on June 28th. So he's already missed a huge number of games, while being paid his salary. So, if he get's suspended, any suspension he gets would have to be retroactive to his first day of admin leave. If the Suspension is less than the games he's already missed, he just has to fork over his salary for that number of games (since they don't get paid while suspended, the money goes to wherever it goes), and he's good to play right away.
  17. I think it will entirely depend on the outcome. If he doesn't even get suspended or gets something very minor, then there will definitely be teams that line up for his services. It will be as simple as "the investigation took place, punishment taken, the matter is closed... back to baseball" If he gets suspended for any length of time though, yeah he'll be blackballed and forgotten.
  18. Pretty far from it TBH, i don't get what he doesn't get. It's just like math, order of operation is important.
  19. If they are answering a direct question from a reporter... sure. If they put out a press release that nobody asked for, answering questions that nobody asked that says they will not be seeking to sign Yasiel Puig or other FA's due to reasons, THAT would be the virtue signal. I'm not sure how much clearly I can put this.
  20. It's entirely possible that previous iterations of the PA felt that way. But..., the PA want's everyone to get paid what they are worth, and what they are seeing currently is that superstars get the big money, and everyone else is getting squeezed. They can't possibly try to get everything they want in one negotiation, so concentrating on smaller, more easily accomplished goals would make sense. Using the numbers I provided, that's a pretty easy place to start from.
  21. It's not a problem to believe he would be a negative acquisition. I made that fairly clear above. If Rogers goes out of their way to let everyone know why they don't want to try and acquire a player who isn't even on their team because of it, unless they are directly asked by a reporter (however unlikely that would be be in a Bauer scenario)... THAT would be the virtue signal.
  22. Among all players to step on the field in 2019, 63.2% had less than three years of service time. They accounted for 53.6% of days of service time accumulated, but they combined for only 9.8% of player pay. That's the problem the PA needs to be focused on right there.
  23. That's moreso what I was getting at. Like, there's no need to Rogers or any other team to proactively go out and say "we aren't interested in X player because "insert virtue signal here". Someone like Yasiel Puig for example. When something happens on your own team, yeah of course you're going to condemn it publicly, like what happened with Osuna or the idiot who put the gay slur on his eyeblack. That's something that happened as a direct result of actions by a player on your team that you have to address. But it seems that with social media, moreso with individuals rather than companies, it's like a competition to see how many causes they can be seen supporting so everyone knows how amazing and inclusive they are and there's like some sort of social points scoreboard being kept somewhere. Raising awareness of an issue is also different than screaming "look at me and how I support X"
  24. It would be easier and ideal. I doubt that he would suck since when he was drafted he played SS, but after 3 years of catching exclusively it wouldn't hurt to get a few hundred innings at 3rd in the minors before anointing him at the big league level. Having someone already in house as a stopgap 3b/2b until they can evaluate his 3b readiness would be ideal. OR, they need to scrap the Moreno 3b idea, bring in someone else for the position, wait until he's fully ready as a catcher and then deal with the catcher problem later.
×
×
  • Create New...