Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

L54

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    13,214
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by L54

  1. Nobody has argued otherwise People have opinions why they would keep player x over player y This isn’t the W you think it is
  2. No interest in Kirk for either of those outfielders on their own. Would rather keep the three headed monster.
  3. Absolutely. If Danny Jansen was a Dodger and they had three catchers the entire board would s*** their pants if Atkins traded for him.
  4. Haha ya pretty much. Anyone but Yankees. f*** the Red Sox too but they don’t look like much competition for the next few years.
  5. Nobody wants to see the Dodgers win every year
  6. That’s gonna be a no from me dog
  7. Okay okay how about Chad Kuhl? I just really wanna get out from the projected 4M Jansen will make and we need pitching
  8. I wonder if the Jays could get Antonio Senzatela for Danny Jansen?
  9. Nobody thinks this and you’re trying too hard
  10. I’d plant Matt Vierling’s ass on the bench right now. Brutal!!
  11. Keibert Ruiz looked like a freaking stud. Mashed in AAA last year. Now we looks like a .270 hitter with a slug under .400 Laika has a good point. Lots of times catcher prospects won’t hit their peak until after that first six years of control. Steep learning curve in the bigs with emphasis on game calling and defense. I fully admit I have no idea who to trade or really have a concrete opinion. I just hope I like the return.
  12. It pains me to say it but I think Jim is right
  13. No idea. I’m sure there would be plenty of guys willing to listen on those two though.
  14. I agree that keeping all three would wind up being a waste. I just don’t think Tyler O’Neil is the guy I would target is all. I would also explore Moreno + another prospect for a starter. Moreno + Tiedemann would land you a front line starter with control.
  15. Hard to say really IMO. If I could trade Jano for an SP with 2 years left and like 2-3 projected WAR I’d rather do that and keep Kirk.
  16. On a team full of holes and limited spending abilities with WS aspirations it makes no sense to use your most valuable trade chip on a player that is redundant on the roster. O’Neil has had one good season and that’s the only year he has over 400 AB’s. Jansen doubled his WAR in 100 fewer AB’s this year The team has enough RHH outfielders and I hate the low BA high K profile. O’Neil is an extremely high variance player. He could put up 6 WAR next year or 1 WAR. The Jays aren’t in the position where the need to hit home runs with player acquisitions, they just need production they can count on.
  17. Not a fan of O’Neil. He has a similar profile to Chapman and in my opinion one of those guys is enough. I don’t think Teo or Gurriel bring back much on terms of SP which makes this feel like a lateral move. A good illustration of why you trade whatever catcher brings back the best return. If this was the best package for Jansen but Kirk lands Triston McKenzie I’d lean moving Kirk
  18. I like your optimism. It’s unlikely he’s as bad as he was this year, but for 19M over the next six years probably has most people a little uneasy.
  19. It’s too bad Berrios is looking like a land mine right now. Having three guys heading into this offseason would be a lot more comfortable than 2.5.
  20. Good point. They’re definitely going to wanna keep Verlander and Contreras probably worth 18M or so. That might make Jano or a lower cost C option higher priority.
  21. Ya I don’t think the Astros catcher prospects are going to prevent them from trying to add a bonafide guy. I wonder how aggressive they’ll be on Willson Contreras this offseason?
×
×
  • Create New...