Seriously though, you guys just need to focus on keeping it fun to post. There are a hundred other places where we can talk about baseball with a straight face. If I wanted to do that, I could call my grandma (big Brett Lawrie fan). If I wanted to talk about the game deeply, there's The Book Blog and BP and Fangraphs and yada yada yada.
People come here for lighthearted Blue Jays chatter, news, and the odd time, humour glazed analytical discussions.
Let's also put this place in f***ing context. Of our ~600 members, 300 are probably bots. 200 probably barely ever check in. We aren't a massive, growing community. There are a relatively small number of people here who post often. Of f***ing course differential treatment is warranted. Use your tiny mod brains.
KingKat said it much better,
"Here's a question... Would it really be so bad if the mods played favorites with the ban hammer? If posters are attracting a lot of complaints shouldn't moderators be empowered to deal with the situation however they see fit rather than wait for an arbitrary line to be crossed? This isn't a court of law, no one is entitled to due process. I wouldn't have an issue with a board that bans people based on a subjective evaluation of the general value of their content rather then on isolated incidents. There's no reason to sacrifice the quality of the board for some platonic ideal of fairness. "
Chappy got it today when he banned MohYou.
If Gsnarls gives me a simple, 100 word (min.) public apology, then I will forgive the whole situation.