Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

G-Snarls

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    40,704

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by G-Snarls

  1. G-Snarls
  2. G-Snarls
    Blue Jays Outright Chris Colabello, Andy Burns By Jeff Todd | December 2, 2016 at 7:39pm CDT The Blue Jays have cleared two 40-man roster spots by outrighting first baseman/outfielder Chris Colabello and infielder Andy Burns, the club announced. Both have cleared waivers, per the organization. The writing was probably on the wall for Colabello when he was suspended last year for a positive PED test after a miserable start to the season. He continued to scuffle badly upon returning to the minors, putting his surprisingly excellent 2015 campaign further in the rearview mirror. As for the 26-year-old Burns, he earned his first brief MLB stint last year. But he performed poorly at Triple-A, slashing just .230/.285/.352 with eight home runs over 454 trips to the plate.
  3. G-Snarls
    YES cf (cutch filler)
  4. G-Snarls
    Good strategy if there's a player you really covet and plan a year in advance
  5. G-Snarls
    It sure will If you have a star quality player who is in his walk year, you'd rather trade him for a couple prospects at the deadline than just get a second round pick
  6. G-Snarls
    At the same time, the signing team loses less of a prime draft pick though, making it easier for these guys to get the deals they want
  7. G-Snarls
    It's probably better than the "one size fits all teams/free agents" that's in place now
  8. G-Snarls
    Headache from trying to digest new QO and comp pick rules Holy f***
  9. G-Snarls
    Gradual rather than sudden increase in luxury tax threshold That's reasonable
  10. G-Snarls
  11. G-Snarls
    Yeah if you're out of contention at the trade deadline you might as well trade a guy you would have qualified. A third round pick is meh. You'll pretty much always do better in trade unless the player is on a stupid contract.
  12. G-Snarls
  13. G-Snarls
    Take him back 1 year 14M
  14. G-Snarls
    Good
  15. G-Snarls
    Sanchez better career But glad we still have both
  16. G-Snarls
    Friends
  17. G-Snarls
    Can't now There's a pact (we're like corrupt cops)
  18. G-Snarls
    4 years 110M
  19. G-Snarls
    I wonder what teams he's considering? Thinking Boston must be one
  20. G-Snarls
    Sorry if old news MLB Network says Edwin won't sign anywhere until new luxury tax threshold has been set
  21. G-Snarls
    MLB network is reporting that there are two serious issues holding things up. The owners want an international draft. The Players Association wants to eliminate draft-pick compensation for free agents.
  22. G-Snarls
    If you want to extend guys long term it only seems smart to start those deals during the arbitration years to buy out some free agency years. Those guys are usually mid 20s of course and they might actually be worth their 7-8 year deal. It gives the player some long term stability and it helps the team maintain a player they might lose it they wait until they're free agents If you're Baltimore you consider that with Machado right now for example. But he's 6 years younger than Donaldson.
  23. G-Snarls
    The real question is SHOULD you ever give out deals of more than 5 years to anyone in their 30s
  24. G-Snarls
    Drive balls into the ground hard and injure himself trying to turn them into infield singles
  25. G-Snarls
    For sure they'd want Pillar and then we're still an outfielder short
×
×
  • Create New...