Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

G-Snarls

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    41,687
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by G-Snarls

  1. Oh no you didn't... http://s3.favim.com/orig/44/selena-gomez-wizards-of-waverly-place-Favim.com-369574.gif
  2. Sure. Think we could get him for Mathis money? (1.5M instead of 6?)
  3. I want Jeff Mathis back as backup on his cheap contract. f***ing Marlins
  4. Me too I'm glad we got Rogers Gomes might have been better than JPA this year, but at best, going forward, we'd still be looking at getting Ruiz, Piern, or Ruiz, and maybe keeping Gomes as backup for next year. No biggie.
  5. Ahh. Now I get it.
  6. I guess I was trying to be nice. LOL.
  7. And Edwin wants to play. Dammit. http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20130912&content_id=60399930&notebook_id=60398758&vkey=notebook_tor&c_id=tor
  8. Morrow's the one who drives you crazy. Can be soooo good but can't stay healthy. I'm not holding my breath on Drabek. He wasn't that good even before his second TJS.
  9. Edwin wants to play. Clearly he doesn't understand draft pick compensation and protected picks etc... http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20130912&content_id=60399930&notebook_id=60398758&vkey=notebook_tor&c_id=tor
  10. f*** you Braves All your catcher are belong to us...
  11. That's sick
  12. Yes. It's the consistency that Rogers lacks, when his fastball doesn't sink. And he doesn't throw the variety that the craftier guys do. I see a rotation of maybe: Buerhle Tanaka Dickey Rogers Morrow or Drabek With pretty good depth in Hutch, Stroman, Romero, Happ How good it that starting rotation? Maybe average in the AL? Hard to say.
  13. Heck, I'm pretty sure I'd take Rogers over Happ too
  14. Sorry but... http://images.wallstcheatsheet.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/bubble1.jpg
  15. I wanted to comment on Happ and found this thread as a jump off point Wow but wow Happ looks bad. I'm not even sure he's even an acceptable #5 starter Here's hoping we pick up a Tanaka or Garza, and get some major upswings next year out of the DL guys (Hutch, Morrow, Drabek) And can retain Johnson on a cheap 1 year deal Egads
  16. Oh, he's a tool allright...
  17. True dat And yumm, sliced bread... Multigrain, soft, with Kraft peanut butter... Mmmm s***, I need to go eat something. LOL
  18. Agree totally And I can still see the possibility (likely? no) of Gose becoming good enough all around to become the every day starting CF. In that case you can trade Rasmus, or move Melky to DH and Rasmus to LF.
  19. Are the Orix Buffaloes as good as the Oakland A's and Boston Red Sox???
  20. Agreed. I like Rajai, quite a bit actually, but we have to save somewhere in order to afford McCann and Tanaka Gose can do what Rajai did (except hit lefties well) and do some things better (catch and throw) for 500k
  21. Gose gets my vote too The 4th OF plays a LOT, is important off the bench, and if he's fast can pinch run. Gose is the new Davis AFAIC. I value the defense too much to risk going with Sierra, even though he's a better hitter
  22. Assumptions: 1. Bautista and Rasmus are not traded, and are healthy in ST 2. Melky Cabrera is healthy and more mobile in ST and is given the regular staring job in LF 3. No new outfielders are acquired (This means no Shin-Soo Choo, sorry. The money needs to be spent on catcher and SP) Who would you take as your 4th OF and why?
  23. A poll shall be made
  24. Serious about preferring to start next year with Cabrera/Rasmus/Bautista/Gose raher than Cabrera/Rasmus/Bautista/Sierra, yes. Unless, of course, something about Gose or Cabrera or Sierra looks so different in spring training that you feel the need to change the plan' Serious about the name calling? No, you're all right Serious about 2104? No, LOL. Obvious typo.
×
×
  • Create New...