G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted May 29, 2019 Posted May 29, 2019 Last couple years have been something 1/3 of the way through the season Multiple teams on pace for franchise records 17 players on pace for 40 HR 7 are on pace for 50 HR Blip or a persistent trend? How much is the ball and how much is a change in hitters approaches?
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted May 29, 2019 Posted May 29, 2019 Are we sure this ain't happening again?
Olerud363 Old-Timey Member Posted May 29, 2019 Posted May 29, 2019 Last couple years have been something 1/3 of the way through the season Multiple teams on pace for franchise records 17 players on pace for 40 HR 7 are on pace for 50 HR Blip or a persistent trend? How much is the ball and how much is a change in hitters approaches? Change in the hitters approach and pitchers approach and shifts. The value of a ball in play is down because of shifts. Thus more sense to go all or nothing. Homeruns at an all time high, strikeouts at an all time high, batting average at a generational (since 70s) low (.24x, x low)
Olerud363 Old-Timey Member Posted May 29, 2019 Posted May 29, 2019 Are we sure this ain't happening again? Have no idea. If so it's both ways. Pitchers are throwing harder then ever. Batters are hitting it back harder then ever.
Spanky99 Old-Timey Member Posted May 29, 2019 Posted May 29, 2019 Are we sure this ain't happening again? Nah, juiced baseball and hitters elevating the baseball, although guys will cheat all the time.
wilko Old-Timey Member Posted May 29, 2019 Posted May 29, 2019 Are we sure this ain't happening again?
FrozenRopes Verified Member Posted May 29, 2019 Posted May 29, 2019 Launch angle, tighter wrapped balls and $$$
Spanky99 Old-Timey Member Posted May 29, 2019 Posted May 29, 2019 Launch angle, tighter wrapped balls and $$$ Agreed.
Omar Old-Timey Member Posted May 29, 2019 Posted May 29, 2019 Last year mlb sanctioned a study with some tall foreheads to determine factors leading to the increase in home runs. In a nutshell, they concluded: 1. It's not the ball. It's not juiced. However there is lower drag coefficient on balls which does improve carry. 2. Weather (temp, humidity, wind, etc) was/is not a factor. 3. Launch angle is overrated. If you want to review the document it is here: http://www.mlb.com/documents/7/9/4/278128794/Full_Report_of_the_Committee_Studying_Home_Run_Rates_in_Major_League_Baseball_052418.pdf
Krylian Old-Timey Member Posted May 29, 2019 Posted May 29, 2019 Launch angle is underrated in the bedroom.
xposbrad Verified Member Posted May 29, 2019 Posted May 29, 2019 Liberals just announced it's because of climate change and they will now start taxing HRs
Krylian Old-Timey Member Posted May 29, 2019 Posted May 29, 2019 Liberals just announced it's because of climate change and they will now start taxing HRs Point #2. Weather is not a factor.
Abomination Old-Timey Member Posted May 29, 2019 Posted May 29, 2019 Last year mlb sanctioned a study with some tall foreheads to determine factors leading to the increase in home runs. In a nutshell, they concluded: 1. It's not the ball. It's not juiced. However there is lower drag coefficient on balls which does improve carry. 2. Weather (temp, humidity, wind, etc) was/is not a factor. 3. Launch angle is overrated. The two bolded parts do not appear to agree with each other
Omar Old-Timey Member Posted May 30, 2019 Posted May 30, 2019 (edited) Last year mlb sanctioned a study with some tall foreheads to determine factors leading to the increase in home runs. In a nutshell, they concluded: 1. It's not the ball. It's not juiced. However there is lower drag coefficient on balls which does improve carry. 2. Weather (temp, humidity, wind, etc) was/is not a factor. 3. Launch angle is overrated. If you want to review the document it is here: http://www.mlb.com/documents/7/9/4/278128794/Full_Report_of_the_Committee_Studying_Home_Run_Rates_in_Major_League_Baseball_052418.pdf The two bolded parts do not appear to agree with each other On the surface yes; however when they say it is not the ball, they are referring to the specific properties of the ball within the manufacturing process and measured by what they call COR (coefficient of restitution) which is how the ball rebounds off a solid object (bat). In the 330 balls they tested there was little variance in COR between balls from various years. They say carry cannot be attributed solely based on the ball characteristics but affected by other factors. Hope that makes sense.... Edited May 30, 2019 by Omar
tbad Verified Member Posted May 30, 2019 Posted May 30, 2019 Ahh Mark and Jose... just dumb enough to dump shitloads of PEDs in their bodies and still be really good at hitting baseballs
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted June 1, 2019 Author Posted June 1, 2019 Most home runs in calendar month, MLB history 1) May 2019: 1,135 2) August 2017: 1,119 3) June 2017: 1,101 4) May 2000: 1,069 5) May 2017: 1,060
Jimcanuck Old-Timey Member Posted June 1, 2019 Posted June 1, 2019 Seems to be a higher rate of pitcher injuries so far this year, which would lower the quality of pitching.
Arjun Nimmala Vancouver Canadians - A+ SS It's been slow going at the start of the season for Nimmala, but on Sunday, he was 3-for-5 with his 3rd home run and 3 RBI. Explore Arjun Nimmala News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now