Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
This isn't true. The Blue Jays had a solid above average draft record with AA (I think).

 

Maybe they have had good systems but they haven't produced much.

 

In 6 years haven't they only produced 6 major league arms with above average or better talent? Stroman, Sanchez, Osuna, Norris, Hoffman and Syndergaard. And in terms of hitters there hasn't been any, Alford is probably the closest thing they have right now and he's only in Dunedin right now?

Community Moderator
Posted
Maybe they have had good systems but they haven't produced much.

 

In 6 years haven't they only produced 6 major league arms with above average or better talent? Stroman, Sanchez, Osuna, Norris, Hoffman and Syndergaard. And in terms of hitters there hasn't been any, Alford is probably the closest thing they have right now and he's only in Dunedin right now?

 

That's a bad way to look at it. The vast majority of players taken haven't even had enough time to have even a remote chance of developing into major leaguers. Even if you look at the 2010 draft, some of those guys are JUST competing for major league spots now (Nicolono, Wojchiechowski, Nolin, Pompey). It takes so long for baseball prospects to develop. The Blue Jays also loved high school arms under AA, which take a long time to develop.

 

But still...

 

You're missing a ton of guys that have made it or are legitimate MLB prospects. Most notably Pillar, Sam Dyson, and DeSclafani if you just want significant MLB players.

Community Moderator
Posted
They also drafted kris Bryant in 2010

 

2010 - Kris Bryant

2011 - Luke Weaver and Aaron Nola. Also Beede.

2012 - Jon Harris

2013 - Bickford, Eric Lauer (2016 draft potential day 1 guy), Sam Tewes (2016 draft potential day 1 guy)

2014 - Tanner Houck (2017 potential 1-1 pick) Jake Latz (2017 potential day 1 guy)

2015 - Brady Singer

Posted
All those would have been awesome draft picks, if they had actually been signed.
Posted
All those would have been awesome draft picks, if they had actually been signed.

 

Still have to give credit for identifying the talent.

Posted
Still have to give credit for identifying the talent.

 

no you don't. Most of these picks were made as hail marys because they were borderline impossible signs. Its not like other teams didn't see the talent, they just didn't want to bother with these tough signs. You don't get credit for those, besides almost every high college pick at some point was also a HS pick that failed to sign with an MLB team. I would guess the Jays under AA were not really special in terms of their HS picks that failed to sign turning into special college players.

Posted
Clearly weren't looking at 2010-2012.

 

Well he made it up with some ugly drafts since then. I think its hard to make the case that under AA, the Jays were anything but average.

Posted
Remember when everyone was ripping me for wanting Turner over Pentecost? Good times.

 

Any player can become an injury problem.

Community Moderator
Posted
no you don't. Most of these picks were made as hail marys because they were borderline impossible signs. Its not like other teams didn't see the talent, they just didn't want to bother with these tough signs. You don't get credit for those, besides almost every high college pick at some point was also a HS pick that failed to sign with an MLB team. I would guess the Jays under AA were not really special in terms of their HS picks that failed to sign turning into special college players.

 

Pretty much this.

 

IIRC the only kind of hail mary picks the Blue Jays actually landed were Tellez and Reggie Pruitt.

 

I guess you could say that it worked out in general? Between 2010 and 2015 they probably took something like 10-15 "hail mary picks" and they ended up landing two of them (unless I'm missing someone). They also altered their draft strategy every single year in order to make the chances of landing one or two tough sign guys higher (taking cheap as s*** college dudes in rounds 5-9 every draft).

 

I wonder if they would have been better off just going with a conventional draft. Take ~5 standard picks based on talent in rounds 5-9 and skip some of the tough sign high school players.

Posted
Pretty much this.

 

IIRC the only kind of hail mary picks the Blue Jays actually landed were Tellez and Reggie Pruitt.

 

I guess you could say that it worked out in general? Between 2010 and 2015 they probably took something like 10-15 "hail mary picks" and they ended up landing two of them (unless I'm missing someone). They also altered their draft strategy every single year in order to make the chances of landing one or two tough sign guys higher (taking cheap as s*** college dudes in rounds 5-9 every draft).

 

I wonder if they would have been better off just going with a conventional draft. Take ~5 standard picks based on talent in rounds 5-9 and skip some of the tough sign high school players.

 

 

 

Wasn't Brentz a Hail Mary pick as well?

Community Moderator
Posted
Wasn't Brentz a Hail Mary pick as well?

 

Yeah I suppose. Although I wasn't really considering any of the guys taken in the 11th/12th rounds because the team generally punted several prior picks with the express intent of signing the players that they picked there. But yeah.

Posted
Yeah I suppose. Although I wasn't really considering any of the guys taken in the 11th/12th rounds because the team generally punted several prior picks with the express intent of signing the players that they picked there. But yeah.

 

I guess Kevin Comer and Daniel Norris were drafted too early to count.

Posted
Pretty much this.

 

IIRC the only kind of hail mary picks the Blue Jays actually landed were Tellez and Reggie Pruitt.

 

I guess you could say that it worked out in general? Between 2010 and 2015 they probably took something like 10-15 "hail mary picks" and they ended up landing two of them (unless I'm missing someone). They also altered their draft strategy every single year in order to make the chances of landing one or two tough sign guys higher (taking cheap as s*** college dudes in rounds 5-9 every draft).

 

I wonder if they would have been better off just going with a conventional draft. Take ~5 standard picks based on talent in rounds 5-9 and skip some of the tough sign high school players.

 

Some of those Round 5-9 cheap signs have turned into good prospects though so its not like they were complete junk. Matt Boyd, Graveman, Girado even Greene were all underslot guys taken in 2013 who have turned out to be great picks.

Posted
Maybe they have had good systems but they haven't produced much.

 

In 6 years haven't they only produced 6 major league arms with above average or better talent? Stroman, Sanchez, Osuna, Norris, Hoffman and Syndergaard. And in terms of hitters there hasn't been any, Alford is probably the closest thing they have right now and he's only in Dunedin right now?

 

Anthony Desclafini as well. So that's 7 arms in 6 years. When you take into account how long it takes the majority of pitchers to get established, it's not that bad

Posted
Pretty much this.

 

IIRC the only kind of hail mary picks the Blue Jays actually landed were Tellez and Reggie Pruitt.

 

I guess you could say that it worked out in general? Between 2010 and 2015 they probably took something like 10-15 "hail mary picks" and they ended up landing two of them (unless I'm missing someone). They also altered their draft strategy every single year in order to make the chances of landing one or two tough sign guys higher (taking cheap as s*** college dudes in rounds 5-9 every draft).

 

I wonder if they would have been better off just going with a conventional draft. Take ~5 standard picks based on talent in rounds 5-9 and skip some of the tough sign high school players.

 

Alford was a long shot to sign, according to the media, so that's a bit of a hail mary, even if he was picked third round.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Anthony Desclafini as well. So that's 7 arms in 6 years. When you take into account how long it takes the majority of pitchers to get established, it's not that bad

 

That still seems pretty bad to be honest 7 arms and maybe two position players (Alford, Pillar).

Posted
That still seems pretty bad to be honest 7 arms and maybe two position players (Alford, Pillar).

 

I get your point on position players, their record has been garbage. But under AA the team went with a lot of projectional prep arms in the early in drafts. I'm not saying it's excellent but it's not terrible either.

 

I think with positional players you could include Hech and Baretto as well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...