bluebird Verified Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 Just thought i would throw it out there and see who you guy's would be fine with to lose for pitching.I will start off with navarro, goins ,dickey,saunders
Zaun of the Dead Verified Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 that would get you a decently mediocre pitcher
ScientificReason Verified Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 Just thought i would throw it out there and see who you guy's would be fine with to lose for pitching.I will start off with navarro, goins ,dickey,saunders We need to give up a lot more then that to get a decent pitcher.
bluebird Verified Member Posted June 14, 2015 Author Posted June 14, 2015 that would get you a decently mediocre pitchergoin's defense and fatty's bat though
GD Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 Goins is a top 5 shortstop you don't trade that
Mikeleelop Verified Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 Just thought i would throw it out there and see who you guy's would be fine with to lose for pitching.I will start off with navarro, goins ,dickey,saunders U can't throw out your s*** and hope to catch anything of value.
MunenoriKawasakiMVP Verified Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 Nobody is going to give a 3rd starter at least for those. I'd be willing to give up one or even two (If the pitcher is controlable for a few year) of Castro, Osuna and Norris. Also, we could give up Pompey if it's really worthwhile because Alford looks like a good option for the future too. I'd do Chapman and Cueto for Castro, Norris and Tepera with the Reds. That would be a trade that would really help us in the bullpen and Cueto would likely keep similar numbers due to the fact that he is already pitching in a sandbox. It could also turn in the advantage of the Reds if Castro and Norris fully pan out
GD Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 lol so much for the trade deadline thread
bluebird Verified Member Posted June 14, 2015 Author Posted June 14, 2015 Nobody is going to give a 3rd starter at least for those. I'd be willing to give up one or even two (If the pitcher is controlable for a few year) of Castro, Osuna and Norris. Also, we could give up Pompey if it's really worthwhile because Alford looks like a good option for the future too. I'd do Chapman and Cueto for Castro, Norris and Tepera with the Reds. That would be a trade that would really help us in the bullpen and Cueto would likely keep similar numbers due to the fact that he is already pitching in a sandbox. It could also turn in the advantage of the Reds if Castro and Norris fully pan outThis offense is so good i wouldn't mind if they guted the farm system for a starter .This might be our only chance to win a title in the next 100 years
jays4life19 Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 lol so much for the trade deadline thread I know eh! I made that thread 6 beers deep at like midnight. So much effort for nothing! lol
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 This offense is so good i wouldn't mind if they guted the farm system for a starter .This might be our only chance to win a title in the next 100 years I knew it was a bad idea for Rogers to ban goats from the Rogers Centre...
RealAccountant Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 that would get you a decently mediocre pitcher In what world?
RealAccountant Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 Nobody is going to give a 3rd starter at least for those. I'd be willing to give up one or even two (If the pitcher is controlable for a few year) of Castro, Osuna and Norris. Also, we could give up Pompey if it's really worthwhile because Alford looks like a good option for the future too. I'd do Chapman and Cueto for Castro, Norris and Tepera with the Reds. That would be a trade that would really help us in the bullpen and Cueto would likely keep similar numbers due to the fact that he is already pitching in a sandbox. It could also turn in the advantage of the Reds if Castro and Norris fully pan out Don't think that convo starts without Hoffman
bluebird Verified Member Posted June 14, 2015 Author Posted June 14, 2015 Don't think that convo starts without Hoffmanworks for me he's no good to the jays 3 years from now when our bats suck
RealAccountant Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 works for me he's no good to the jays 3 years from now when our bats suck hmmm where have i heard that before, 3 years ago....
Abomination Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 Imo we don't add to the starting pitching unless it's a cheaper acquisition cost salary dump by someone. We should be able to get a fairly decent reliever or two without subtracting one of our top arms though. We have our rotation set up for the future with Stroman, Hoffman, Norris, Sanchez, Hutch, and a few other guys who could go to either starting or relieving. I don't want to see us mortgage that for a shot at the post season, then spend another 10 years rebuilding. We know from experience it's nearly impossible to get top starting pitchers to come to Toronto, even if we're willing to overpay them. Build the pitching from within, and buy the bats (especially after they remove the turf).
bluebird Verified Member Posted June 14, 2015 Author Posted June 14, 2015 Imo we don't add to the starting pitching unless it's a cheaper acquisition cost salary dump by someone. We should be able to get a fairly decent reliever or two without subtracting one of our top arms though. We have our rotation set up for the future with Stroman, Hoffman, Norris, Sanchez, Hutch, and a few other guys who could go to either starting or relieving. I don't want to see us mortgage that for a shot at the post season, then spend another 10 years rebuilding. We know from experience it's nearly impossible to get top starting pitchers to come to Toronto, even if we're willing to overpay them. Build the pitching from within, and buy the bats (especially after they remove the turf).That's depressing ,give's me no hope for world title this year
RealAccountant Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 ^ Matt Garza is a guy I'd like to see the Jays go out and get. Theyd be taking on his 2016 and 2017 years as well, but he is only 31. He hasn't pitched that well this year, so the Brewers might be willing to let him go to a team that takes on the contract. Unless he has a no trade clause.
P2F Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 ^ Matt Garza is a guy I'd like to see the Jays go out and get. Theyd be taking on his 2016 and 2017 years as well, but he is only 31. He hasn't pitched that well this year, so the Brewers might be willing to let him go to a team that takes on the contract. Unless he has a no trade clause. Eww.
jays4life19 Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 Imo we don't add to the starting pitching unless it's a cheaper acquisition cost salary dump by someone. We should be able to get a fairly decent reliever or two without subtracting one of our top arms though. We have our rotation set up for the future with Stroman, Hoffman, Norris, Sanchez, Hutch, and a few other guys who could go to either starting or relieving. I don't want to see us mortgage that for a shot at the post season, then spend another 10 years rebuilding. We know from experience it's nearly impossible to get top starting pitchers to come to Toronto, even if we're willing to overpay them. Build the pitching from within, and buy the bats (especially after they remove the turf). I think Ian Kennedy could come pretty cheap if SD falls out of it. I posted my thoughts in the ahem....trade thread. http://www.bluejaysmessageboard.com/threads/4916-2015-Trade-Deadline-Targets-Thread
Ziggyy108 Verified Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 ^ Matt Garza is a guy I'd like to see the Jays go out and get. Theyd be taking on his 2016 and 2017 years as well, but he is only 31. He hasn't pitched that well this year, so the Brewers might be willing to let him go to a team that takes on the contract. Unless he has a no trade clause. The Brewers might be willing to let him go??? Lol they would be so god damn happy to shed his salary If we really only do have limited funds then Garza would be a disaster
burlingtonbandit Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 I think Ian Kennedy could come pretty cheap if SD falls out of it. I posted my thoughts in the ahem....trade thread. http://www.bluejaysmessageboard.com/threads/4916-2015-Trade-Deadline-Targets-Thread Not sure Ian Kennedy is the answer. He gives up a ton of hard contact and coming to the Al East and RC from SafeCo and the NL West likely won't work too well. If its just a salary dump I'll take on the rest of the contract and plug him in as the number 5 but he's pretty similar to Estrada. Jays need a number 2/3 not a back end guy
Abomination Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 ^ Matt Garza is a guy I'd like to see the Jays go out and get. Theyd be taking on his 2016 and 2017 years as well, but he is only 31. He hasn't pitched that well this year, so the Brewers might be willing to let him go to a team that takes on the contract. Unless he has a no trade clause. Yeah, Garza could work. Maybe Colon (who I believe has been rumored to be very available), maybe Harang. Those type of guys are who we should be chasing imo. Maybe Cliff Lee if he manages to get in some rehab games before the trade deadline and looks good, although that option year for next year is kind of painful (as is the buyout).
jays4life19 Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 Not sure Ian Kennedy is the answer. He gives up a ton of hard contact and coming to the Al East and RC from SafeCo and the NL West likely won't work too well. If its just a salary dump I'll take on the rest of the contract and plug him in as the number 5 but he's pretty similar to Estrada. Jays need a number 2/3 not a back end guy 2014: 31.5% Hard% (3.5 fWAR season) 2015 31.2% Hard% ...His 20%+ HR/FB is not going to continue. He should be pretty decent going forward.
ElNik2013 Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 Imo we don't add to the starting pitching unless it's a cheaper acquisition cost salary dump by someone. We should be able to get a fairly decent reliever or two without subtracting one of our top arms though. We have our rotation set up for the future with Stroman, Hoffman, Norris, Sanchez, Hutch, and a few other guys who could go to either starting or relieving. I don't want to see us mortgage that for a shot at the post season, then spend another 10 years rebuilding. We know from experience it's nearly impossible to get top starting pitchers to come to Toronto, even if we're willing to overpay them. Build the pitching from within, and buy the bats (especially after they remove the turf). Jays4Life16 made a similar post and suggested Ian Kennedy and that seems about right. Agreed with both. I'm not into this window thing, let's focus on a sustainable model, which is what AA talked about before he gained so much weight. Your point about how difficult it is for the Jays to attract top FA SP is also a good one and I hope AA doesn't make another Marlins/Dickey trade because of it.
ElNik2013 Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 I think Ian Kennedy could come pretty cheap if SD falls out of it. I posted my thoughts in the ahem....trade thread. http://www.bluejaysmessageboard.com/threads/4916-2015-Trade-Deadline-Targets-Thread That was a good thread and should've made this thread unnecessary. It was probably derailed by the jokes about the mistake on the original title (i.e. "2016" instead of "2015"). Definitely agree on targeting Ian Kennedy types. Sort of like McCarthy last year.
ElNik2013 Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 What about one of the Mets starters? What would it take to get a guy like Niese?
Horses Fart Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 R.A. Dickey and Josh Thole for Noah Syndergaard. s*** disturber. Lol lol.
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 works for me he's no good to the jays 3 years from now when our bats suck We have Donaldson under control for 4 years...
RealAccountant Old-Timey Member Posted June 14, 2015 Posted June 14, 2015 What about one of the Mets starters? What would it take to get a guy like Niese? They are leading their division
JoJo Parker Dunedin Blue Jays - A SS On Tuesday, Parker was just 1-for-5, but the one hit was his first professional home run. Explore JoJo Parker News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now