Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
That xFIP and FIP are fundamentally flawed. These 2 stats both incorporate fly ball rates and use this to calculate an expected runs given up per 9. However, all flyballs are not the same, yet these stats treats this the same. Is a fly ball from EE and Josh Thole the same thing? That is the $64,000 question, brothers.
Posted
That xFIP and FIP are fundamentally flawed. These 2 stats both incorporate fly ball rates and use this to calculate an expected runs given up per 9. However, all flyballs are not the same, yet these stats treats this the same. Is a fly ball from EE and Josh Thole the same thing? That is the $64,000 question, brothers.

 

You tell them nerds!!!!

Posted
That xFIP and FIP are fundamentally flawed. These 2 stats both incorporate fly ball rates and use this to calculate an expected runs given up per 9. However, all flyballs are not the same, yet these stats treats this the same. Is a fly ball from EE and Josh Thole the same thing? That is the $64,000 question, brothers.

 

JFaS is already in his lab formulating a post. Give him a minute.

Posted
That xFIP and FIP are fundamentally flawed. These 2 stats both incorporate fly ball rates and use this to calculate an expected runs given up per 9. However, all flyballs are not the same, yet these stats treats this the same. Is a fly ball from EE and Josh Thole the same thing? That is the $64,000 question, brothers.

 

lol

 

FIP = Walks, K's, HR and Outs (Outs = Outs)

Posted

No, of course not all hitters hit the same fly balls. Power hitters hit more fly balls and generate higher HR/FB rates than average. That's what makes them power hitters.

 

If a pitcher only faced lineups filled with Edwin Encarnacions he wouldn't regress to his xFIP (FIP does NOT incorporate fly balls btw, that's the only difference between the two stats). However, in a large sample the opposition will even out. In a large sample the representative hitter a pitcher faces will have a ~10% HR/FB. That's a fact.

 

It's the same with ERA and every non-opposition adjusted stat in existence. xFIP is not opposition-adjusted and nobody claims that it is. It's not. I don't know why advanced stats are always held to a much higher standard in this regard.

Community Moderator
Posted
Confirmed FIP is flawed by this logic, and that xFIP corrects it.

 

I really wish FG would use xFIP in their WAR calculations rather than FIP. There's really no good reason for incorporating HR/FB luck and ignoring GB rate.

Posted
While we're on the subject, EE has also disproved the usefulness of BABIP. Does a ball put in play by Ryan Goins have the same chance of being a hit as a ball put in play by EE? That is the $125,000 question, dudes.
Community Moderator
Posted
I know what you mean, but it's a non issue. Those runs that are luck are then lost and not attributed to some part of the team (BABIP goes to defense theoretically). WAR is just a descriptor stat with limitations. Its true value is when it's used to describe projections.

 

I mean more for conversation/discussion purposes than actually using the numbers for anything substantive. It's annoying when you're talking about a 3 WAR guy who had a 4% HR/FB. Minor pet peeve.

Verified Member
Posted
Hitters have control of their BABIP. Some guys really are .380 BABIP hitters and others really are .260 ones. It depends mostly on the hitter's speed and his batted ball distribution. Pitchers do not have control of BABIP. Over a large sample the average true talent of the hitters a pitcher faces will be ~.300 (can differ depending on park) and thus his BABIP against will regress to that.

 

Also, bad example: Goins' career MLB BABIP is only seven points lower than EE's and his minor league track record suggest he's probably actually even or better than EE at BABIP.

 

Your second statement is actually not true by the argumentation of your first, and by the arguments laid out in the OP (with your own 10% threshold agreeing). Although, it is *usually* true, it is definitely not guaranteed in any way, not even over large samples. However, these differences can still be discounted when evaluating a player, which is what this stat matters for anyway.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Also, bad example: Goins' career MLB BABIP is only seven points lower than EE's and his minor league track record suggest he's probably actually even or better than EE at BABIP.

 

IIRC, there's very little correlation between MiLB BABIP and MLB BABIP.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
That xFIP and FIP are fundamentally flawed. These 2 stats both incorporate fly ball rates and use this to calculate an expected runs given up per 9. However, all flyballs are not the same, yet these stats treats this the same. Is a fly ball from EE and Josh Thole the same thing? That is the $64,000 question, brothers.

 

You listened to me! My hero.

Posted
While we're on the subject, EE has also disproved the usefulness of BABIP. Does a ball put in play by Ryan Goins have the same chance of being a hit as a ball put in play by EE? That is the $125,000 question, dudes.

 

Why not do this with your regular account, why create a troll account for this? Have some balls at least, man.

Posted
who is it?

 

Not certain. There's about 3 or 4 obsessive types on here who dedicate their lives to needling the SABR nerdlingers every chance they get, one of them for sure.

 

Creating a troll account to say what you don't have the balls to say with your regular account? Highly homosexualist.

Posted
False. They have control over it. It just has a tighter distribution vis-a-vis individual hitter's BABIP variances. Same with HR/FB% (pitcher's have control).

 

RTTM is for dumnies. It's a sign of giving up.

They may a little, okay, but it's virtually impossible to tell if a pitcher's low BABIP one season is talent or luck. It takes 8 full seasons for pitcher BABIP to stabilize and 9.4 seasons for HR/FB to stabilize -- an entire career for lots of pitchers.

 

It's irresponsible to take a couple seasons of a distorted HR/FB from a pitcher and say "this pitcher is especially homer-prone/homer-resistant." Fly ball rates stabilize much quicker so you really should just take that and assign a ~10% HR/FB.

Posted
Not certain. There's about 3 or 4 obsessive types on here who dedicate their lives to needling the SABR nerdlingers every chance they get, one of them for sure.

 

Creating a troll account to say what you don't have the balls to say with your regular account? Highly homosexualist.

 

I am a new poster. I don't want to offend anybody. However, EE has provided tangible evidence discrediting xFIP and BABIP, this can not be ignored.

Posted
I am a new poster. I don't want to offend anybody. However, EE has provided tangible evidence discrediting xFIP and BABIP, this can not be ignored.

 

Oh please. Your introductory post in last night's GT was something like "hi all I'm here to educate you all on baseball". Give me a break, obvious troll account is obvious.

 

Why be a little manlet about it? Just blast people with your default account, it's not like this is Fagbook and people will know your real ID. Stop being such a sackless pussy about this.

Posted
I am a new poster. I don't want to offend anybody. However, EE has provided tangible evidence discrediting xFIP and BABIP, this can not be ignored.

No he hasn't, it's very easy to ignore what you're saying. xFIP and BABIP are not adjusted for the opponent. Nobody is saying that a lineup full of EEs will produce a 10% HR/FB. However, a pitcher who plays an American League schedule will, on average, face a lineup representative of the American League. The reality of that lineup is a 10% HR/FB. This isn't hard to understand.

 

Do you really think you've discredited two decades of sabermetric research by pointing out that EE is not an average player?

Posted
Not certain. There's about 3 or 4 obsessive types on here who dedicate their lives to needling the SABR nerdlingers every chance they get, one of them for sure.

 

Creating a troll account to say what you don't have the balls to say with your regular account? Highly homosexualist.

 

haha fair enough

Verified Member
Posted

 

Do you really think you've discredited two decades of sabermetric research by pointing out that EE is not an average player?

 

So you're saying I shouldn't have just torn my copy of The Book in two?

 

This is awkward.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...