fatcowxlive Old-Timey Member Posted April 5, 2014 Author Posted April 5, 2014 Putting words in his mouth makes you look dumn. Ok I'm dumn: Ok lets have a few more balls get over his head before you change his mind. Hes an average CF would be really good in LF. Fans need to get over this illusion hes an outstanding defensive player. Very, very dumn
Atothe Old-Timey Member Posted April 5, 2014 Posted April 5, 2014 Blujay is going full troll now, so I suggest you guys ignore. His hyperboles knows no bound
fatcowxlive Old-Timey Member Posted April 5, 2014 Author Posted April 5, 2014 The IQ these posts would suggest is probably around Goins' projected wRC+ I'm out lol I think Goins's projections might be higher lol
theblujay Verified Member Posted April 5, 2014 Posted April 5, 2014 So do you guys think they should've won yesterday after all dat bad luck? Today too? They should be undefeated!
theblujay Verified Member Posted April 5, 2014 Posted April 5, 2014 Ok I'm dumn: Very, very dumn Where did he same Gibbons needs to play him in LF every day
Angrioter Old-Timey Member Posted April 5, 2014 Posted April 5, 2014 Navarro looking like JP Wanna see Kratz
8D Verified Member Posted April 5, 2014 Posted April 5, 2014 roflmao!!!! who else saw taht phantom ass grab?!?! hahahahha
fatcowxlive Old-Timey Member Posted April 5, 2014 Author Posted April 5, 2014 Where did he same Gibbons needs to play him in LF every day "You can take a horse to the lake, but you can't make him drink"
Orgfiller Old-Timey Member Posted April 5, 2014 Posted April 5, 2014 So do you guys think they should've won yesterday after all dat bad luck? Today too? They should be undefeated! Find a quote where anyone implies that we should be winning today or should have won yesterday, DO IT.
o2cui2i Community Moderator Posted April 5, 2014 Posted April 5, 2014 anyone know what happened to the forum tonight? might be a good thing it didn't work. saved reading hundreds of flame outs.
theblujay Verified Member Posted April 5, 2014 Posted April 5, 2014 I don't like the term positional value first off. That implies good offence at a defensive first position. Which I think Colby is average. While I feel Colby is a good defensive outfielder is because he takes strong routes and can make plays when he gets there. I think other CF's can make more plays. He doesn't have great closing speed or a strong throwing arm which I consider extremely important to the position where you cover the most ground. People will disagree thats fine. But LF is a more natural fit for Colby and he has more then enough offence to warrant playing LF. I agree, but these guys never will as long as their stats say otherwise
theblujay Verified Member Posted April 5, 2014 Posted April 5, 2014 Find a quote where anyone implies that we should be winning today or should have won tomorrow, DO IT. I'm asking you
fatcowxlive Old-Timey Member Posted April 5, 2014 Author Posted April 5, 2014 Find a quote where anyone implies that we should be winning today or should have won tomorrow, DO IT. Don't waste your time arguing with people who think Colby should be playing LF on this team. They're acting like Gose or Diaz at CF (Inferring from their posts) and Colby in left is much better lmao
Orgfiller Old-Timey Member Posted April 5, 2014 Posted April 5, 2014 I don't like the term positional value first off. That implies good offence at a defensive first position. Which I think Colby is average. While I feel Colby is a good defensive outfielder is because he takes strong routes and can make plays when he gets there. I think other CF's can make more plays. He doesn't have great closing speed or a strong throwing arm which I consider extremely important to the position where you cover the most ground. People will disagree thats fine. But LF is a more natural fit for Colby and he has more then enough offence to warrant playing LF. We might agree to disagree here, but Rasmus most definitely covers a lot of ground, of course other CF's make more plays, he's not Bourjous. And re: the positional value thing, it's basically providing the same offense at LF, a less valuable position, or at CF, a more valuable one, not that hard to comprehend.
theblujay Verified Member Posted April 5, 2014 Posted April 5, 2014 Don't waste your time arguing with people who think Colby should be playing LF on this team. They're acting like Gose or Diaz at CF (Inferring from their posts) and Colby in left is much better lmao First of all, all i said was that the outfield D was bad today. Second, Gose in center and Rasmus in LF is much better defense than what we have now
fatcowxlive Old-Timey Member Posted April 5, 2014 Author Posted April 5, 2014 Dammit he hit it right to third
GD Old-Timey Member Posted April 5, 2014 Posted April 5, 2014 Doesn't make it the bible because its the best we got. I don't trust in what is inconsistent. Doesn't mean I don't look at it. I just don't value it as highly as you do or even close maybe. But then why trust anything? You surely trust something if you're so adamant about Colby being in LF, but if you're not going to accept that no stat or viewpoint is absolutely 100% perfect, then why even bother? No stat is perfect. No eye test is perfect. We go with the best we've got and DRS/UZR >>> eye test.
Orgfiller Old-Timey Member Posted April 5, 2014 Posted April 5, 2014 I'm asking you Ok, here's a quote that clearly demonstrates John's thoughts on Rasmus' position: "When will they realize Rasmus isn't a CF hes a LF." "Hes an average CF would be really good in LF" oh look another.
theblujay Verified Member Posted April 5, 2014 Posted April 5, 2014 Some SABR-bro answer this for me: all I've heard for days is how unlucky our pitchers have been. So do you think our record has be ravaged by bad luck even though we've been badly out scored and overmatched in our losses
o2cui2i Community Moderator Posted April 5, 2014 Posted April 5, 2014 We might agree to disagree here, but Rasmus most definitely covers a lot of ground, of course other CF's make more plays, he's not Bourjous. And re: the positional value thing, it's basically providing the same offense at LF, a less valuable position, or at CF, a more valuable one, not that hard to comprehend. my problem is that Colby is not reading the ball off the bat so far this year. he's not making the plays coming in or going back. he's been better... at the plate he is back to leaking out really early. he's selling out and letting his front shoulder pull out. only hit he has was on a mistake up and in. he'll hit that fastball all day long but cant touch a breaking ball which is what he is going to see until he changes.
Orgfiller Old-Timey Member Posted April 5, 2014 Posted April 5, 2014 First of all, all i said was that the outfield D was bad today. Second, Gose in center and Rasmus in LF is much better defense than what we have now Except that what Gose makes up in defense he loses badly on offense.
theblujay Verified Member Posted April 5, 2014 Posted April 5, 2014 Ok, here's a quote that clearly demonstrates John's thoughts on Rasmus' position: "When will they realize Rasmus isn't a CF hes a LF." "Hes an average CF would be really good in LF" oh look another. I'm asking you if you think the Jays should've won these games
theblujay Verified Member Posted April 5, 2014 Posted April 5, 2014 This right here shows just how naive you and a lot of SABER believers are. The ball was down and on the outside corner of the plate. Impossible to hit. It has nothing to do with luck or BABIP. Uh oh, you're gonna wake up bug, bad JFAS, king of the trolls. "It doesn't matter where the pitch is if its hit, it's all the same"
vic city Verified Member Posted April 5, 2014 Posted April 5, 2014 Get ready for Goins/Diaz/Thole lineup tomorrow! LOL. All because Dickhead needs his personal catcher! That's an insult to Diaz!
JFD Old-Timey Member Posted April 5, 2014 Posted April 5, 2014 We sure as hell do a lot of losing. Incredibly mediocre over the last 21 years and counting. yeah but it's mostly bad luck. 21 years of bloop singles and biased umps.
Arjun Nimmala Vancouver Canadians - A+ SS It's been slow going at the start of the season for Nimmala, but on Sunday, he was 3-for-5 with his 3rd home run and 3 RBI. Explore Arjun Nimmala News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now